한국어 영형 대용의 해결과 최적성 이론
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
영형은 음성적 또는 형태적으로 실현되지 않는 대상이므로 그 지시 대상의 확인과 관련해서 문제를 야기할 수 있다. 특히, 통제 영역 내에서 통제받지 않는 영형으로 분류되는 대용적 기능의 영형은 그 지시 대상의 확인이 중요하다. 지시 대상의 확인을 위한 방법으로 여러 가지 이론이 있을 수 있으나 본 연구에서는 통합적 방법인 최적성 이론을 기반으로 확인을 시도하였다. 이를 위해 일곱 가지 보편 제약을 제안하였다.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to resolve the Korean zero anaphora by the method based on the Optimality Theory. Korean zero forms are divided into three types according to syntactic distribution and uses-deictic, general and anaphoric. Anaphoric zero forms are unidentifiable syntactically. Therefore, this causes the problems concerned with identification of their referents. An approach based on the pragmatic inference isn't also method enough to resolve anaphora. But, the Optimality theoretic approach which is unified method can resolve Korean zero anaphora successfully. In order to identify the referent of zero anaphora, the following seven universal constraints are established and used; a. Be Relevant (BR) b. Theta-role Match (TM) c. Morphological Match (MM) d. Disjoint Interpretation (DI) e. Recency Preference Construal (RPC) f.FunctionalParallelism (FP) g. Center-Continue (CC). These seven constraints are ranked as following: BR > TM > MM > DI > RPC > FP > CC
참고문헌 (26)
- "한국어 담화의 중심화" (1994)
- "한국어 영형 대용의 지시 해석에 관한 최적성 연구" (2003)
- "지시와 조응", 186, pp.115~149 (1984)
- "화용론 연구" (1986), 탑출판사
- "통합문법론-담화와 화용" (1994), 서울대학교 출판부
- "Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory", 17, pp.673~711 (1999)
- "The Optimalization of Discourse Anaphora" (2002), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
- "Recency Effect in English Inversion. Centering Theory in Discourse", pp.309~326 (1998), Oxford: Clarendon Press
- "Information Unpackaging: A Constraint-based Unified Grammar Approach to Topic-Focus Articulation", 10, pp.459~460 (2002)
- "Optimal Subjects and Subject Universals,Is the Best Good Enough Optimality and Competition in Syntax", pp.193~219 (1998), Mass.: MIT Press and MIT Working papers in Linguistics
- "Providing a Unified Account on Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse Proceeding of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics", pp.44~50 (1983)
- "Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse", 21(2), pp.203~225 (1995)
- "Lost Intuitions and Forgotten Intentions,Centering Theory in Discourse,Walker", pp.39~54 (1998), Oxford: Clarendon Press
- "Centering, Global Focus, and Right-Dislocation,Centering Theory in Discourse,Walker", pp.293~308 (1998), Oxford: Clarendon Press
- "Optimality Theoretic Semantics", 24, pp.1~32 (2001)
- "Centering Theory and Argument Deletion in Spoken Korean", 11(1), pp.9~24 (2000)
- "Optimality and Anaphora Resolution", 6(2), pp.1~22 (2002)
- "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- "The Case of Japanese" (1985), Stanford University
- "Intrasentential Centering : A Case Study,Centering Theory in Discourse,Walker", pp.115~138 (1998), Oxford: Clarendon Press
- "An Optimality Approach to Long Distance Anaphors" (1995), University of Washington
- "Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar New Brunswick and University of Colorado" (1993), Prince Rutgers University
- "Optimality: From Neural Networks to Universal Grammar", 275, pp.1604~1610 (1997)
- "Form, Function in Typology of Grammatical voice Systems,Optimality- Theoretic Syntax,Geraldine Legendre", pp.355~392 (2000), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
- "Optimality Theory and Syntax: Movement and Pronunciation,Optimality Theory,Archangeli, D", pp.171~199 (1997), Blackwell publishers
- "Constraints on Null Pronouns,Optimality-Theoretic Syntax,Geraldine Legendre", pp.393~426 (2001), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press