‘이/가’ 주제설에 대하여
On 'i/ka' as a Topic Marker
2
조회
0
다운로드
56
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines whether 'i/ka' functions as a topic marker in Korean or not. First of all, I choose the definition of topic and focus in terms of relational givenness, and treat topic and focus as relationally old and new information respectively. Then, I discuss the status of 'i/ka' as a topic marker critically by examining the examples in the literature on 'i/ka' as a topic marker from the three aspects: misuse of topic or focus, confusion of linguistic levels, and confusion between relational givenness and referential givenness. Through such an examination, it is found that the examples cannot make sure the topichood of 'X-i/ka' at all. Finally, I expose two kinds of examples which have not been considered seriously in the literature on 'i/ka' as a topic marker, but seem to show the usage of 'X-i/ka' as topic. The information structure of those examples concerns with the individual/stage-level properties of the predicates employed. But some thorough examination shows that they cannot guarantee the status of 'i/ka' as a topic marker, either. Therefore, it is concluded that 'i/ka' is not a topic marker.
Abstract
This paper examines whether 'i/ka' functions as a topic marker in Korean or not. First of all, I choose the definition of topic and focus in terms of relational givenness, and treat topic and focus as relationally old and new information respectively. Then, I discuss the status of 'i/ka' as a topic marker critically by examining the examples in the literature on 'i/ka' as a topic marker from the three aspects: misuse of topic or focus, confusion of linguistic levels, and confusion between relational givenness and referential givenness. Through such an examination, it is found that the examples cannot make sure the topichood of 'X-i/ka' at all. Finally, I expose two kinds of examples which have not been considered seriously in the literature on 'i/ka' as a topic marker, but seem to show the usage of 'X-i/ka' as topic. The information structure of those examples concerns with the individual/stage-level properties of the predicates employed. But some thorough examination shows that they cannot guarantee the status of 'i/ka' as a topic marker, either. Therefore, it is concluded that 'i/ka' is not a topic marker.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김귀화, "국어의 격연구" (1994), 한국문화사
- 김영희, "겹주어론", 한글, 162, pp.39~75 (1978)
- 박철우, "한국어 정보구조에서의 화제와 초점", 박사, pp.1998
- 서정수, "국어의 이중 주어 문제: 변형 생성 문법적 분석", 국어국문학, 52, pp.1~28 (1971)
- 성기철, "국어의 주제 문제", 한글, 188, pp.65~89 (1985)
- 신창순, "국어의 주어문제 연구", 문법연구, 2, pp.131~170 (1975)
- 이인영, "주제와 화제: 기존 화제 개념에 대한 재고", 어학연구, 32, pp.61~99 (1996)
- 임홍빈, "국어의 주제화 연구", 국어연구, 28 (1972), 국어연구회
- 임홍빈, "한국어의 주제와 통사 분석: 주제 개념의 새로운 전개" (2007), 서울대학교 출판부
- 전영철, "한국어 총칭표현들의 의미론적 분석", 언어학, 37, pp.267~296 (2003), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
- 채완, "조사 ‘-는’의 의미. 국어의 통사·의미론", pp.83~101 (1982), 탑출판사
- 최규수, "한국어 주제어와 임자말 연구" (1999), 부산대학교 출판부
- 최윤지, "한국어 분열문의 유형에 따른 의미와 정보구조" (2009), 서울대학교
- 홍용철, "특수조사 “는”에 대한 통합적 분석", 생성문법연구, 15(3), pp.397~413 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- Gundel, Jeanette K., "Topic and Focus. The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.175~196 (2004)
- Heycock, Caroline, "Japanese -Wa, -Ga and Information Structure. The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics", pp.54~83 (2008)
- Jacobs, Joachim, "The Dimensions of Topic-Comment", Linguis, 39, pp.641~681 (2001)
- Kuroda, S.-Y., "Focusing on the Matter of Topic: A Study of Wa and Ga in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 14(1), pp.1~58 (2005)
- Paul, Hermann, "Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte" (1880), Leipzig
- Vallduví, Enric, "The Information Component", 박사, pp.1990