본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제시어와 화제

Presentation Word and Topic

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to clarify the nature of unratified topic of Korean presentation words. What this paper argues can be summarized as follows: first, it is typical that nominal coindexation is not used in the presentation word construction. Presentation words are mainly used to introduce discourse referents. The combination of presentation words and ‘-i/ga’ is related to the focus function of ‘-i/-ga’. Second, presentation words are unratified topics that is not activated and presupposed. Third, coindexical nominals of sentences in the presentation word construction are devices that help hearer access to discourse referents. Lastly, the presentation word construction which has ‘-eun/neun’ constituent is dual topic construction.

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the nature of unratified topic of Korean presentation words. What this paper argues can be summarized as follows: first, it is typical that nominal coindexation is not used in the presentation word construction. Presentation words are mainly used to introduce discourse referents. The combination of presentation words and ‘-i/ga’ is related to the focus function of ‘-i/-ga’. Second, presentation words are unratified topics that is not activated and presupposed. Third, coindexical nominals of sentences in the presentation word construction are devices that help hearer access to discourse referents. Lastly, the presentation word construction which has ‘-eun/neun’ constituent is dual topic construction.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 구본관, "한국어 문법 총론 Ⅰ" (2015), 집문당
  2. 김민국, "한국어의 격조사와 초점 - 주격과 대격을 중심으로 -", 國語學, (78), pp.165~219 (2016), 국어학회[DOI]
  3. 김민선, "한국어의 목적어 전치와 조사에 따른 정보구조", 한국어 의미학, 23, pp.21~56 (2007), 한국어의미학회
  4. 김영희, "한국어 제시어의 문법", 주시경학보, 4, pp.114~138 (1989), 탑출판사
  5. 김영희, "한국어 통사론을 위한 논의" (1998), 한국문화사
  6. 김지은, "국어에서 주어가 조사 없이 나타나는 환경에 대하여", 한글, 212, pp.68~87 (1991), 한글학회
  7. 남윤진, "우리말 연구 서른아홉마당", pp.157~191 (2005), 태학사
  8. 박진호, "보조사의 역사적 연구", 國語學, (73), pp.375~435 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
  9. 박철우, "국어 분리 구성의 형식과 기능", 언어학, (49), pp.211~233 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  10. 박철우, "‘대조’ 의미의 언어학적 성격 —정보구조와 관련하여", 한국어 의미학, 45, pp.129~157 (2014), 한국어의미학회
  11. 박철우, "보조사의 기능과 정보구조", 國語學, (73), pp.269~307 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
  12. 이선웅, "國語의 文章 提示語에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(1), pp.59~84 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
  13. 이정민, "(비)한정성", (불)특정성 대 화제(Topic), 국어학, pp.1992, 22[DOI]
  14. 이정훈, "조사와 어미 그리고 통사구조" (2008), 태학사
  15. 임동훈, "‘은", 는’과 종횡의 의미 관계, 2012, pp.(64), 217~271[DOI]
  16. 임홍빈, "국어 명사구와 조사구의 통사구조에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 24, pp.1~62 (1999), 서울대 국어국문학과
  17. 임홍빈, "한국어 무조사 명사구의 통사와 의미", 國語學, (49), pp.69~106 (2007), 국어학회
  18. 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
  19. 2013, , ~
  20. 채완, "話題의 意味", 冠嶽語文硏究, 4, pp.205~227 (1979), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
  21. 최윤지, "한국어 정보구조 연구", 박사, pp.2016
  22. Chafe, W. L., "Subject and Topic", pp.25~55 (1976), Academic Press
  23. Chafe, W. L., "Coherence and Grounding in Discourse", pp.21~51 (1987), Publishing Company
  24. Dik, Simon C., "Functional Grammar" (1978), North-Holland
  25. Gundel, J., "Studies in Syntactic Typology", pp.209~239 (1988), Benjamins
  26. Gundel, J., "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.175~196 (2004), Blackwell
  27. Hole, D., "The Expression of Information Structure", pp.45~70 (2012), De Gruyter Mouton
  28. Kim, Ilkyu, "Is Korea –(n)un a topic marker?: On the nature of –(n)un and its relation to information structure", Lingua, 154, pp.87~109 (2015)
  29. Krifka, M., "A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions", Linguistische Berichte, (Suppl. 4), pp.17~53 (1991)
  30. Kroeger, P. R., "Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical-functional Approach", pp.137~138 (2004), Cambridge University Press
  31. Lambrecht, K., "Information Structure and Sentence Form" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  32. Lambrecht, K., "Language Typology and Language Universals: an International Handbook vol. 2", pp.1050~1078 (2001), Walter de Gruyter
  33. Lambrecht, K., "Sentence accent in information questions:Default and projection", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, pp.477~544 (1998)
  34. Li, Charles N., "Subject and Topic", pp.457~489 (1976), Academic Press
  35. Luraghi, S., "Key Terms in Syntax and Syntactic Theory" (2008), Bloomsbury Publishing
  36. Molnár, V., "The Architecture of Focus", pp.197~233 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
  37. Oh, Chisung, "Topic and Focus Constructions in Spoken Korean", Ph.D., pp.2007
  38. 오치성, "Ratified and Unratified Topics in Spoken Korean", 언어학, 16(3), pp.25~41 (2008), 대한언어학회
  39. Prince, E. F., "Radical Pragmatics", pp.223~255 (1981), Academic Press
  40. Prince, E. F., "The Limits of Syntax(Syntax and Semantics Vol.29)", pp.281~302 (1998), Academic Press
  41. Reinhart, T., "Pragmatics and linguistics : An analysis of sentence topics", Philosophica, 27, pp.53~94 (1981)
  42. Roberts, C., "Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning vol. 2", pp.1908~1934 (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
  43. Steedman, M., "Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface", Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), pp.649~689 (2000)
  44. Ward, G., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language", pp.1363~1447 (2002), Cambridge University Press
  45. Xu, L., "Topic structure in Chinese", Language, 61, pp.1~27 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)