인지언어학으로 보는 학교 문법의 품사
Parts of Speech in School Grammar from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is concerning the way Cognitive Linguistics attempts to handle parts of speech in school grammar. Radical Construction Grammar discards the assumption that syntactic categories are the primitive elements of syntactic representation. Instead, constructions are the primitive elements of syntactic representation, and categories are defined by constructions. Cognitive Linguists also argue for the notion that certain words are more prototypical members of a word class than others. It turns out that Noun has the Prototype Effects, and the dependant noun is a member of the periphery. It is also suggested that some elements can belong to more than one word class at a time by the mechanism of metonymy. The rules in school grammar assume that items of a certain category all behave identically with respect to the relevant rules. But, the ways in which a word is used are often specific to the word itself. This paper examined that the ways in which ‘issta’ and ‘epta’ is used are specific to the word itself. This data strongly suggests that knowledge of a word and its behavior can only be attained through exposure to meaning and actual usage events, whose particularities are noted and laid down in memory.
Abstract
This paper is concerning the way Cognitive Linguistics attempts to handle parts of speech in school grammar. Radical Construction Grammar discards the assumption that syntactic categories are the primitive elements of syntactic representation. Instead, constructions are the primitive elements of syntactic representation, and categories are defined by constructions. Cognitive Linguists also argue for the notion that certain words are more prototypical members of a word class than others. It turns out that Noun has the Prototype Effects, and the dependant noun is a member of the periphery. It is also suggested that some elements can belong to more than one word class at a time by the mechanism of metonymy. The rules in school grammar assume that items of a certain category all behave identically with respect to the relevant rules. But, the ways in which a word is used are often specific to the word itself. This paper examined that the ways in which ‘issta’ and ‘epta’ is used are specific to the word itself. This data strongly suggests that knowledge of a word and its behavior can only be attained through exposure to meaning and actual usage events, whose particularities are noted and laid down in memory.
참고문헌 (44)
- 정희창, "고등학교 문법" (2002), 교육인적자원부
- 구본관, "남북의 품사 분류와 한국어 교육", Korean 연구와 교육, (창간), pp.149~169 (2005)
- 김민수, "국어문법론" (1974), 일조각
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2011), 탑출판사
- 남길임, "현대국어 ‘이다’ 구문 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
- 박부자, "‘대로’의 형성", 구결연구, (24), pp.201~236 (2010), 구결학회
- 박승빈, "조선어학" (1935), 조선어학연구회
- 배주채, "‘물론’의 품사와 구문", 國語學, 42, pp.53~81 (2003), 국어학회
- 배진영, "관형사 범주 설정에 대한 논의 - 체언 수식 용언 활용형을 중심으로 -", 국어교육연구, (47), pp.165~188 (2010), 국어교육학회(since1969)
- 송창선, "현대국어 ‘이다’의 문법적 처리-‘아니다’와의 관련성을 중심으로-", 어문학, (98), pp.121~157 (2007), 한국어문학회
- 시정곤, "이다' 구문과 통사적 접사설을 다시 논의함", 한국어학, 28, pp.55~80 (2005), 한국어학회
- 신지연, "간투사의 화용론적 특성", 주시경학보, 3, pp.165~169 (1989)
- 이관규, "학교문법론" (2002), 월인
- 이상태, "품사 개념의 지도를 위한 한 방식 - ‘품사 그림’ 만들기", 국어교육연구, (44), pp.87~102 (2009), 국어교육학회(since1969)
- 이숭녕, "고등국어문법" (1951), 을유문화사
- 이익섭, "국어학개설" (2011), 학연사
- 이정택, "관형사의 품사 설정 문제", 한말연구, 13, pp.167~187 (2003), 한말연구학회
- 이현희, "범주로서의 품사와 품사 전형성 - 명사와 그 중복 범주를 대상으로 -", 한국학연구, (39), pp.359~384 (2011), 한국학연구소
- 이희승, "초급국어문법" (1949), 박문출판사
- 이희승, "국어학개설" (1955), 민중서관
- 정인승, "표준문법" (1956), 계몽사
- 주시경, "국어문법" (1910), 박문서관
- 최웅환, "품사 분류에 대한 검토-학교 문법의 품사를 대상으로-", 문학과 언어, 31, pp.55~78 (2009)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음문화사
- 허웅, "국어학" (1983), 샘문화사
- Aarts, Bas, "The handbook of English linguistics. Blackwell handbooks in linguistics", pp.117~145 (2006), Blackwell
- Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Croft, William, "Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Croft, William, "Cognitive Linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Dirven, Réne, "Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. Metonymy in language and thought", pp.275~287 (1999), John Benjamins
- Haspelmath, Martin, "The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. The new psychology of language, vol. 2, ed", pp.211~242 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Hopper, Paul, "The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar", Language, 60(4), pp.703~752 (1984)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Lakoff, George, "Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I, theoretical prerequisites" (1987), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Grammar and conceptualization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Cognitive Grammar, In The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.421~462 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Rosch, Eleanor H, "Natural categories", Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp.328~350 (1973)
- Rosch, Eleanor H., "Cognitive representations of semantic categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, pp.193~233 (1975)
- Ross, John Robert., "Nominal decay" (1981), Department of Linguistics, MIT
- Zero-Derivation, "Zero-derivation -functional change- metonymy, In Approaches to Conversion", pp.2005, Schönefeld, Doris.
- Taylor, John R, "Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Taylor, John R, "The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind" (2012), Oxford University Press