VC구문에 대한 인지문법적 해석
A Cognitive Grammatical Approach to VC Constructions
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper will look at the relationship and categorization of different VCs, from which we propose that looking at these issues through the lens of Cognitive Grammar, specifically that of Prototype categorization theory and Construction Grammar, can provide more adequate explanations. Previous studies have solely used ‘meaning’ as the criteria for categorizing VCs into: resultative, degree(state), evaluation, etc. However, it will be shown that this approach, which is based on classical categorization theory, can neither categorize all the different VCs clearly, nor can it provide precise standards for categorization of VCs. Based on Prototype categorization theory, we suggest that the prototype VC has the following three features: V is a transitive verb; V and C have high intentional inevitability; C indicates objective result. VCs that have these three features, such as ‘砸破, 敲碎’, are prototypes of VCs and they denote resultative meaning. As these are central members, all VCs are structured radically including degree(state), evaluation, etc. As for the VCs that denote aspectual meaning, such as ‘到, 住’, they become members of a new eco system made by prototypes of VCs based on Lakeoff(1987). Additionally, according to Construction Grammar, we assume that VC is a construction, and explain that different VC constructions form a ‘meaning chain’, and this can give an appropriate account for the polysemy of VC constructions.
Abstract
This paper will look at the relationship and categorization of different VCs, from which we propose that looking at these issues through the lens of Cognitive Grammar, specifically that of Prototype categorization theory and Construction Grammar, can provide more adequate explanations. Previous studies have solely used ‘meaning’ as the criteria for categorizing VCs into: resultative, degree(state), evaluation, etc. However, it will be shown that this approach, which is based on classical categorization theory, can neither categorize all the different VCs clearly, nor can it provide precise standards for categorization of VCs. Based on Prototype categorization theory, we suggest that the prototype VC has the following three features: V is a transitive verb; V and C have high intentional inevitability; C indicates objective result. VCs that have these three features, such as ‘砸破, 敲碎’, are prototypes of VCs and they denote resultative meaning. As these are central members, all VCs are structured radically including degree(state), evaluation, etc. As for the VCs that denote aspectual meaning, such as ‘到, 住’, they become members of a new eco system made by prototypes of VCs based on Lakeoff(1987). Additionally, according to Construction Grammar, we assume that VC is a construction, and explain that different VC constructions form a ‘meaning chain’, and this can give an appropriate account for the polysemy of VC constructions.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김동환, "인지언어학과 개념적 혼성이론" (2013), 박이정
- 김보영, "구문문법의 관점으로 본 중국어 이중타동구문 연구", 석사, 중어중문학과 어학전공, pp.2012
- 남양우, "동태존재구문에 대한 인지적 접근", 중국어문논총, (73), pp.55~80 (2016), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 박정구, "동보형식의 이원적 체계에 대한 고찰", 중국학보, 47, pp.91~110 (2003), 한국중국학회
- 시정곤, "논항구조란 무엇인가" (2000), 월인
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 范晓, "语法研究和探索(3)" (1985), 北京大学出版社
- 陆俭明, "“VA了”述补结构语义分析", 汉语学习, 1 (1990)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1980), 商务印书馆
- 马真, "形容词作结果补语情况考察(二)", 汉语学习, 4 (1997)
- 施春宏, "汉语动结式的句法语义研究" (2008), 北京语言大学出版社
- 王红旗, "动结式述补结构的语义是什么", 汉语学习, 1 (1996)
- 王力, "中国现代语法" (1985), 商务印书馆
- 吴有晶, "致使", 非致使交替以及反致使化研究----以现代汉语动结式为例, 复旦大学, 2017
- Lakoff, G., "인지 의미론" (1995), 한국문화사
- Levin, B, "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Goldberg, A, "Constructions at Work" (2006), Oxford University Press
