본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

절단 동사 ‘끊다’, ‘자르다’, ‘베다’의 의미와 용법에 대한 코퍼스언어학적 분석

A Corpus-based Analysis of the Uses and Meanings of the Verbs of Cutting kkunhta, caluta, and peyta ‘cut’ in a Written Korean Corpus

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This research attempts to characterize the verbs of cutting kkunhta, caluta, and peyta, all of which can be translated as ‘cut,’ through an examination of a Korean written corpus. It first points out problems and weaknesses of traditional approaches to synonymy carried out in terms of register variation and componential analysis. Second, this study examines and compares the frequency of these three verbs in the database, showing that kkunhta is the most frequently used word among the three. Third, this research claims that the three words of cutting can be characterized properly by examining the co-occurrence relations of the verbs and with their accompanying objects and instruments. Fourth, examination of the data shows that kkunhta occurs most frequently with abstract nouns which denote habits, activities, abstract notions. Caluta occurs with nouns of concrete objects with a high frequency rate. It is also used with some abstract nouns, denoting figurative meanings. Peyta, on the other hand, most often takes concrete noun objects. Examination shows that the three words share the meaning of cutting to a certain extent, but they differ in the patterns of co-occurrence relations and in the expression of figurative meanings.

Abstract

This research attempts to characterize the verbs of cutting kkunhta, caluta, and peyta, all of which can be translated as ‘cut,’ through an examination of a Korean written corpus. It first points out problems and weaknesses of traditional approaches to synonymy carried out in terms of register variation and componential analysis. Second, this study examines and compares the frequency of these three verbs in the database, showing that kkunhta is the most frequently used word among the three. Third, this research claims that the three words of cutting can be characterized properly by examining the co-occurrence relations of the verbs and with their accompanying objects and instruments. Fourth, examination of the data shows that kkunhta occurs most frequently with abstract nouns which denote habits, activities, abstract notions. Caluta occurs with nouns of concrete objects with a high frequency rate. It is also used with some abstract nouns, denoting figurative meanings. Peyta, on the other hand, most often takes concrete noun objects. Examination shows that the three words share the meaning of cutting to a certain extent, but they differ in the patterns of co-occurrence relations and in the expression of figurative meanings.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
  2. 권기수, "日·韓両国語の切断動詞類の考察", 일어일문학, 58(58), pp.5~26 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
  3. 김억조, "사전 기술과 말뭉치의 ‘넓다", 좁다’ 의미 대립 연구, 2009, pp.(103), 41~63[DOI]
  4. 金俊基, "현대국어 타동사 유의어 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.1999
  5. 김준기, "분리성 동사의 의미 고찰", 한국어교육학회지, 103, pp.133~164 (2000)
  6. 김준기, "척도 형용사의 다의성 연구", 새국어교육, (67), pp.119~142 (2004), 한국국어교육학회
  7. 김해연, "코퍼스에서의 어휘 ‘가깝다’의 의미와 용법 분석", 담화와 인지, 18(3), pp.65~88 (2011), 담화·인지언어학회
  8. 김해연, "말뭉치 분석을 통한 ‘멀다’의 의미와 용법 연구", 언어학, (61), pp.61~84 (2011), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  9. 김해연, "문어 말뭉치에 나타나는 '예쁘다'와 '아름답다'의 의미와 용법 비교 연구", 담화와 인지, 19(1), pp.29~54 (2012), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  10. 김해연, "절단동사 ‘끊다’와 ‘자르다’의 의미와 용법에 대한 코퍼스언어학적 연구", 한국코퍼스언어학회·한국텍스트언어학회·스토리텔링연구소 2014 봄철 공동학술대회 (2014)
  11. 박영순, "국어의미론" (2004), 고려대학교 출판부
  12. 서순현, "日·韓兩言語における切斷の意味を表す動詞の意味の對照硏究 : 「きる」「たつ」と「자르다」「끊다」", 석사, 일어일문학과, pp.2012
  13. 서태길, "<도구성> 절단 동사의 낱말밭과 의미특성에 대한 연구", 어문논집, (66), pp.193~212 (2012), 민족어문학회
  14. 이익환, "의미론 개론" (1989), 한신문화사
  15. 윤평현, "국어의미론" (2008), 도서출판 역락
  16. 임지룡, "다의어의 인지적 의미 특성", 언어학, (18), pp.229~261 (1996), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  17. 임지룡, "다의어의 비대칭 양상 연구", 언어과학연구, 15, pp.309~331 (1998)
  18. "연세한국어사전" (1998), 두산동아
  19. Altenberg, Beng., "Lexis in contrast: Corpus-based approaches" (2002), John Benjamins
  20. Barcelona, Antonio., "Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  21. Biber, Douglas., "Corpus linguistics" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  22. Bolinger, Dwight., "Meaning and form" (1971), Longman
  23. Cruse, D. A., "Lexical semantics" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  24. Dirven, René., "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  25. Geeraerats, Dirk., "Theories of lexical semantics" (2010), Oxford University Press
  26. Hunston, Susan., "Pattern grammar" (2000), John Benjamins
  27. Hurford, James., "Semantics: A Coursebook" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  28. Kennedy, Graeme., "An introduction to corpus linguistics" (1998), Longman
  29. Kövecses, Zoltan., "Metaphor: A practical introduction" (2002), Oxford University Press
  30. Lakoff, George., "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  31. Lyons, John., "emantics, vols, I & II" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  32. Majid, Asifa., "The semantic categories of CUTTING and BREAKING events : A crosslinguistic perspective", Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), pp.133~152 (2007)
  33. McEnery, Tony., "Lexis in contrast: An advanced resource book" (2006), Routledge
  34. Partington, Alan., "Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching" (1998), John Benjamins
  35. Saeed, John., "Semantics" (2009), Wiley-Blackwell
  36. Teubert, Wolfgang., "Corpus linguistics" (2007), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)