50, 60년대 신문의 언론 자유 논증에 대한 담화 연구: 언론 자유의 주장과 제약 논증을 중심으로
A discourse study for argumentation on freedom of speech in the South Korean newspapers in 1950-1960s
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the meaning and argumentation of the freedom of speech appearing in the editorials and columns of the Kyeonghyang Newspaper and the Dong-A Daily Newspaper from 1948 to 1962. In the South Korean society, the discussions on this era, in which the democratic republic was commenced, conceptualized the meaning of the freedom of speech, and had a large effect on today’s perception on the freedom of speech. This paper analyzed the discussions by using practical argumentation, which is one of methods used recently for critical discourse studies. At the time, the freedom of speech was not sufficiently guaranteed, and the system and laws that can guarantee it were not in place yet. The discourses of the freedom of speech showed complex aspects whereby amidst argumentations claiming the guarantee of the freedom of speech, arguments for restricting it were intersecting. Furthermore, other arguments such as fairness of journalism, journalist ethics, or national security were met. Through this analysis, we can understand how today’s perception on the freedom of speech was formed. For a long time, the freedom of speech was perceived narrowly in the media’s freedom and norms. The disappearance of arguments since 1960s left large tracks by taking opportunities away from the society for discussion and reasoning on the freedom of speech, rather than the freedom of speech itself. Hence, the freedom of speech will not be recovered in the state of disappeared oppression only. A greater freedom of everyone will be completely obtained through debates on the arguments that restricted the freedom, and more fierce reasoning for the fairness.
Abstract
This study analyzed the meaning and argumentation of the freedom of speech appearing in the editorials and columns of the Kyeonghyang Newspaper and the Dong-A Daily Newspaper from 1948 to 1962. In the South Korean society, the discussions on this era, in which the democratic republic was commenced, conceptualized the meaning of the freedom of speech, and had a large effect on today’s perception on the freedom of speech. This paper analyzed the discussions by using practical argumentation, which is one of methods used recently for critical discourse studies. At the time, the freedom of speech was not sufficiently guaranteed, and the system and laws that can guarantee it were not in place yet. The discourses of the freedom of speech showed complex aspects whereby amidst argumentations claiming the guarantee of the freedom of speech, arguments for restricting it were intersecting. Furthermore, other arguments such as fairness of journalism, journalist ethics, or national security were met. Through this analysis, we can understand how today’s perception on the freedom of speech was formed. For a long time, the freedom of speech was perceived narrowly in the media’s freedom and norms. The disappearance of arguments since 1960s left large tracks by taking opportunities away from the society for discussion and reasoning on the freedom of speech, rather than the freedom of speech itself. Hence, the freedom of speech will not be recovered in the state of disappeared oppression only. A greater freedom of everyone will be completely obtained through debates on the arguments that restricted the freedom, and more fierce reasoning for the fairness.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김현강, "언론의 공정성 개념 - 신문 사설에 대한 담론적 접근", 담화와 인지, 23(1), pp.57~87 (2016), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 문종대, "소유권적 언론 자유에 대한 일고찰-로크의 사회계약론을 중심으로", 한국언론정보학보, 17, pp.7~36 (2001)
- 성선제, "언론의 자유의 사상적 기초", 헌법학연구, 7(1), pp.181~206 (2001)
- 이명구, "언론의 자유와 언론의 공적 임무", 법학연구, 14, pp.189~201 (1997)
- 이민웅, "숙의민주주의 4차원과 언론 역할", 한국언론학보, 49(6), pp.342~372 (2005), 한국언론학회
- 최영재, "언론 자유와 공정성", 한국언론학보, 48(6), pp.326~342 (2004), 한국언론학회
- Fairclough, Isabela, "Political discourse analysis" (2012), Routledge
- Habermas, Jürgen, "The theory of communicative action. vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society" (1984), Heinemann
- 김현강, "A discursive approach to the concept of “freedom of speech” - With a focus on the 1946–1959 editorials and columns of the Kyunghyang Shinmum and the Dong-A Ilbo", 언어사실과 관점, 40, pp.117~146 (2017), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- Rawls, John, "A theory of justice" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Sayer, Andrew, "Who’s afraid of critical social science?", Current Sociology, 57, pp.767~786 (2009)[DOI]
- Walton, Douglas, "Media Argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Wodak, Ruth, "Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis" (2016), Sage