‘-어서’ 절 과 ‘-니까’ 절의 의미 차이에 대한 연구: 양상 의미를 중심으로
On the Semantic Differences between nikka and ese Clauses in Korean: Focused on Their Modal Meaning
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to investigate the semantic differences between two causal clauses in Korean (i.e. nikka-clause and ese-clause) based on their modal meaning. In this paper, we claim that the causal clauses create a certain type of modal environment, namely reason context. We suggest that Anand & Hacquard’s (2009) distinction between subjective epistemic and objective epistemic can be extended to Korean causal clauses. In this way, we propose that nikka-clauses and ese-clauses correspond to subjective and objective epistemic respectively. Considering the nature of the reason context, we also discuss how the speaker’s epistemic certainty can be involved with uttering a sentence with a causal relation felicitously. Taken together with Mari’s (2016) idea that the criteria for the mood choice can be parameterized, we suggest that the properties of the reason context which distinguish it from the attitude context lead to the mood distinction between nikka and ese-clauses.
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the semantic differences between two causal clauses in Korean (i.e. nikka-clause and ese-clause) based on their modal meaning. In this paper, we claim that the causal clauses create a certain type of modal environment, namely reason context. We suggest that Anand & Hacquard’s (2009) distinction between subjective epistemic and objective epistemic can be extended to Korean causal clauses. In this way, we propose that nikka-clauses and ese-clauses correspond to subjective and objective epistemic respectively. Considering the nature of the reason context, we also discuss how the speaker’s epistemic certainty can be involved with uttering a sentence with a causal relation felicitously. Taken together with Mari’s (2016) idea that the criteria for the mood choice can be parameterized, we suggest that the properties of the reason context which distinguish it from the attitude context lead to the mood distinction between nikka and ese-clauses.
참고문헌 (72)
- 2012, , ~
- 개념을 통한 해석―, "제28차 한국어의미학회 전국학술대회", 2011, ~, pp.상명대학교
- 남기심, "국어의통사⋅의미론", pp.2~26 (1983), 탑출판사
- 목정수, "한국어 정보화와 구문 분석" (2004), 월인
- 박재연, "‘주어 지향적 양태’와 관련한 몇 문제", 한국어학, 44, pp.1~25 (2009), 한국어학회
- 성기철, "｢주시경 학보｣ 11", pp.50~72 (1993), 탑출판사
- 성낙수, "이유, 원인을 나타내는 접속문 연구(2)", 한글, 162 (1978), 한글학회
- 안주호, "‘-어야 하-’류 구성의 문법적 특성과 의미", 국어교육, (118), pp.363~394 (2005), 한국어교육학회
- 안희영, "현대 한국어 접속어미의 계층에 관한 연구 : '-어서'와 '-니까'를 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.2007
- 윤평현, "현대 국어 접속어미 연구" (2005), 도서출판 박이정
- 이동혁, "‘-어야 하다’의 양태 의미에 대하여", 國語學, (76), pp.95~122 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이은경, "-어서'절과 '-니까'절의 서술어 유형", 한국어학, 36, pp.221~248 (2007), 한국어학회
- 장경희, "{-니까}의 의미와 그 해석 : {-어서}와 대비하여", 선청어문, 21, pp.337~367 (1993), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 정인아, "한국어의 시점(視點)에 관한 연구 ‘-아서", 어서’와 ‘-(으)니까’의 시야(視野)를 중심으로, 2012, pp.48(3), 463~485[DOI]
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 허세문, "원인절의 의미와 시점 - 연결어미 ‘-어서’와 ‘-니까’를 중심으로 -", 한글, (308), pp.193~231 (2015), 한글학회
- 황화상, "연결어미 '-어서', '-니까'의 의미 기능과 후행절 유형", 國語學, (51), pp.57~88 (2008), 국어학회[DOI]
- "Epistemics with Attitudes, in Proceedings of SALT 18" (2009)[URL]
- Anand, Pranav, "Epistemics and attitudes", Semantics and Pragmatics, 6, pp.1~59 (2013)
- Austin, John Langshaw, "How to do things with words" (1962), Harvard University Press
- Bylinina, Lisa, "Pronouns in Embedded Contexts at the Syntax-Semantics Interface", The landscape of perspective shifting, talk given at the Workshop (2014), Universität Tübingen
- Condoravdi, Cleo, "Performative verbs and performative acts", Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung, 15, pp.149~164 (2011)
- Condoravdi, Cleo, "Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force", Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 9, pp.37~58 (2012)
- Crnič, Luka, "Pragmatics of epistemics in attitudes: A reply to Anand & Hacquard (2013)", ms, pp.2013
- Davidson, Donald, "Actions, reasons, and causes", Journal of Philosophy, 60, pp.685~700 (1963)
- Davidson, Donald, "Causal relations", Journal of Philosophy, 64, pp.691~703 (1967)
- Farkas, Donka, "Intensional Descriptions and the Romance Subjunctive" (1985), Garland
- von Fintel, Kai, "What is presupposition accommodation, again?", Philosophical perspectives, 22, pp.137~170 (2008)
- von Fintel, Kai, "CIA Leaks", Philosophical Review, 117, pp.77~98 (2007)
- von Fintel, Kai, "Must... stay... strong!", Natural Language Semantics, 18, pp.351~383 (2010)
- von Fintel, Kai, "Epistemic Containment", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.173~198 (2003)
- Giannakidou, Anastasia, "The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity", Lingua, 119, pp.1883~1908 (2009)
- Hacquard, Valentine, "Aspects of modality", Ph.D, pp.2006
- Hara, Yurie, "Evidentiality of Discourse Items and Because-clauses", Journal of Semantics, 25, pp.229~268 (2008)
- Hintikka, Jaakko, "Knowledge and Belief" (1962), Cornell University Press
- Hoe Semoon, "On the de se reading in the de se center shift in Korean, to appear at Boundaries, Phases, and Interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte", John Benjamins Publishing
- Hoe Semoon, "A Syntactic Approach to the 1st Person Restriction of Causal Clauses in Korean", Proceedings of The 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (2016)
- Hooper, Joan B, "On the applicability of root transformations", Linguistic Inquiry, 4, pp.465~497 (1973)
- Homer, Vincent, "Intervention effects : The case of presuppositions", MA, pp.2007
- Kaplan, David, "Themes from Kaplan", pp.481~564 (1989), Oxford University Press
- Kaufmann, Magdalena, "Interpreting Imperatives" (2012), Springer
- Kratzer, Angelka, "Events and Grammar", pp.163~196 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Modals and conditionals" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Kuno, Susumu, "Empathy and syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.625~672 (1977)
- Lasersohn, Peter, "Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste", Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, pp.643~686 (2005)
- Lee, Chungmin, "Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics", pp.381~420 (2006), Elsevier
- Lee, Chungmin, "The Cloud of Knowing: Non-factive al-ta ‘know’ (as a Neg-raiser) in Korean", Proceedings of The 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (2016)
- Lee, Kum Young, "Finite Controls in Korean", Doctor, pp.2009
- Lim, Dongsik, "Evidentials and Interrogatives: A case study from Korean", Ph.D, pp.2010
- "Epistemic attitudes, consensus and truth. Workshop Modality and subjectivity" (2015)[URL]
- Mari, Alda, "Assertability conditions of epistemic (and fictional) attitudes and mood variation", Proceedings of SALT, 26, pp.61~81 (2016)
- Oh, Sang-suk, "A three-level semantic approach to Korean causal conjunctive suffixes -(e)se and -(u)nikka: A corpus-based analysis", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10, pp.469~488 (2005)
- Park, Yugyeong, "A grammar of mood and clausal adjunction in Korean", Doctor, pp.2015
- Park, Yugyeong, "What is the reason to give a reason?", Proceedings of LENLS, 2015, pp.201~214 (2015)
- Portner, Paul, "Imperatives and modals", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.351~383 (2007)
- Portner, Paul, "Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Portner, Paul, "Mood and contextual commitment", Proceedings of SALT, 22, pp.461~487 (2012)
- Quer, Joseph, "Moods at the interfaces", Ph.D, pp.1998
- Rooth, Matts, "Association with Focus", Ph.D, pp.1985
- Schlenker, Philippe, "Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003", pp.269~310 (2003), John Benjamins
- Schlenker, Philippe, "Maximize Presupposition and Gricean reasoning", Natural Language and Semantics, 20, pp.391~429 (2012)
- Speaker-oriented and Event-oriented Causals: A comparative analysis of -nikka and –ese, Korean Linguistics VI, "Sohn, Sung-Ock S", 83~93 (1992)
- Sohn, Sung-Ock S, "Cognition, Affect, and Topicality of the Causal Particle -nikka in Korean", Japanese, 1993, pp.2, 82~97
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University Press
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Common ground", Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, pp.701~721 (2002)
- Stephenson, Tamina, "Towards a subjective theory of meaning", Ph.D, pp.2007
- Tancredi, Christopher, "A Multi-Modal Theory of I-Semantics", ms, pp.2007
- Villalta, Elisabeth, "Mood and gradability : an investigation of the subjunctivemood in Spanish", Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, pp.467~522 (2008)
- Weatherson, Brian, "Epistemic Modality", pp.1~18 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Yanovich, Igor, "Standard Contextualism Strikes Back", Journal of Semantics, 31, pp.67~114 (2014)
- Yoon, Suwon, "Parametric variation in subordinate evaluative negation:Korean", Japanese versus others, 2013, pp.22, 133~166
- Zanuttini, Raffaella, "A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subject", Natural Language and Linguist Theory, 30, pp.1231~1274 (2012)