‘이다’ 구문에 대한 인지적 접근
A Cognitive Approach to the Copula Construction of Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘ida’ (Korean copula) is one of the most frequently used forms in Korean, and ‘ida’ constructions are construed as having various meanings, for example, according to contexts, ‘I am ham sandwich’ (literally Korean) can mean ‘The food which I’d like to eat/make is ham sandwich’ (in some case, ‘I’d like to eat/make ham sandwich’ is also possible), and ‘You are football again' can mean ‘You are playing/watching fooball again’. Most studies on ‘ida’ or ‘ida’ construction have focused on the grammatical category of ‘ida’ or syntactic structure of the construction. This paper aims to explain why ‘ida’ construction can be construed so variously. In this paper I claimed that the various meanings of ‘ida’ constructions are due to metonymy (as for the above examples, ‘PERSON WHO ORDERS/MAKES FOOD’ FOR ‘THE FOOD’ and ‘NAME OF A GAME’ FOR ‘PLAYING/WATCHING THE GAME’). As such, it follows that we don't need any special syntactic explanations in order to show their meaning differences.
Abstract
‘ida’ (Korean copula) is one of the most frequently used forms in Korean, and ‘ida’ constructions are construed as having various meanings, for example, according to contexts, ‘I am ham sandwich’ (literally Korean) can mean ‘The food which I’d like to eat/make is ham sandwich’ (in some case, ‘I’d like to eat/make ham sandwich’ is also possible), and ‘You are football again' can mean ‘You are playing/watching fooball again’. Most studies on ‘ida’ or ‘ida’ construction have focused on the grammatical category of ‘ida’ or syntactic structure of the construction. This paper aims to explain why ‘ida’ construction can be construed so variously. In this paper I claimed that the various meanings of ‘ida’ constructions are due to metonymy (as for the above examples, ‘PERSON WHO ORDERS/MAKES FOOD’ FOR ‘THE FOOD’ and ‘NAME OF A GAME’ FOR ‘PLAYING/WATCHING THE GAME’). As such, it follows that we don't need any special syntactic explanations in order to show their meaning differences.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김동환, "환유의 경계설정에 관한 연구", 영어영문학, 21(3), pp.67~89 (2016), 미래영어영문학회
- 김의수, "형식동사 ‘이다’의 문법", 어학연구, 38(3), pp.879~906 (2002), 언어교육원
- 김진웅, "‘이다’ 구문의 화용적 용법에 관한 소고-‘나는 짜장면이다’류의 해석을 중심으로-", 반교어문연구, (41), pp.263~283 (2015), 반교어문학회
- 남기심, "국어문법의 탐구 Ⅰ- 국어 통사론의 문제", pp.36~51 (1996), 태학사
- 남길임, "현대국어 ‘이다’ 구문 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
- 목정수, "기능동사 ' 이다 ' 구성의 쟁점", 언어학, (22), pp.245~290 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 목정수(睦正洙), "韓國語 문법 체계에서의 ‘이다’의 正體性 - 기능동사 擁護論 -", 어문연구(語文硏究), 34(4), pp.55~82 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
- 박재연, "한국어 환유 표현의 체계적 분류 방법", 한국어 의미학, 45, pp.1~30 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 박진호, "환유 개념의 통사적 적용", (사)한국언어학회 학술대회지, pp.381~396 (2016), (사)한국언어학회
- 양정석, "‘이다’ 구문의 의미 해석", 동방학지, 91, pp.99~134 (1996), 연세대학교 동방학연구소
- 양정석, "‘이다’의 문법범주와 의미", 국어학, 37, pp.337~366 (2001), 국어학회
- 유현경, "‘이다’의 범주와 문법 기술", 문법 교육, 26, pp.253~285 (2016), 한국문법교육학회
- 임근석, "국어 {이다}의 어휘소 분할에 대하여", 한국어학, 57, pp.299~329 (2012), 한국어학회
- 임동훈, "‘이다’ 구문의 제시문적 성격", 國語學, (45), pp.119~144 (2005), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "어문학 연구의 넓이와 깊이", pp.287~376 (2006), 역락
- 홍재성, "프랑스어와 한국어 계사 구문의 유형론적 대조 연구", 학술원논문집, 49, pp.29~89 (2010), 학술원
- Barcelona, A., "Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads – A Cognitive Perspective", pp.1~28 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Barcelona, A., "Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics – Towards a consensus view", pp.7~57 (2011), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Bierwiaczonek, B., "Metonymy in language, thought and brain" (2013), Equinox Publishing Ltd
- Cienki, A., "The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.170~187 (2007), Oxford Univ. Press
- Croft, W., "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast", pp.161~205 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Dancygier, B., "Figurative Language" (2014), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Evans, V., "Cognitive Linguistics - An Introduction" (2006), Edinburgh Univ. Press
- Geeraerts, D., "Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics - Towards a consensus view", pp.89~102 (2011), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Gibbs, R., "The poetics of mind - Figurative thought, language, and understanding" (1994), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Kalisz, R., "Perspectives on Metonymy", pp.31~41 (2007), Peter Lang
- Kövecses, Z., "Metaphor - A Practical Introduction" (2010), Oxford Univ. Press
- Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things - What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), The Univ. of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors We Live by" (2003), The Univ. of Chicago Press
- Nunberg, G., "Transfer of Meaning, Journal of Semantics 12", pp.109~132 (1995), Oxford Univ. Press
- Paradis, C., "Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones", Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), pp.245~264 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Panther, K., "The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.236~263 (2007), Oxford Univ. Press
- Radden, G., "Metonymy in Language and Thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., "Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics - Towards a consensus view", pp.103~123 (2011), John Benjamins Publishing Company