한국어 “교착” 현상에 대한 연구 ―러시아어 굴절과 비교하여―
“Agglutination” in Korean: Contrasting Inflection in Russian
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates characteristic features of the Korean “inflection” in comparison of the Indo-European (particularly, Russian) inflection. The utmost important fact that Korean inflection reveals, as the current study claims, is “non-obligatoriness” of inflectional categories in their actualization in the sentence. They are not something that grammatical rules obligate to be expressed, which is the case for Russian, but something that the speaker chooses for semantic or pragmatic needs. This fact helps to understand some interesting features of Korean “agglutinative” inflection. First, zero expressions cannot be established for Korean morphology. Second, Korean agglutinative morphemes are not part of the phrasal head, but a feature of the whole phrase, which is realized at the end of each (extended) phrase. Third, the semantic/syntactic relation between the preceding phrase and the morpheme, on the one hand, and between the morphemes, on the other, is hierarchical. Fourth, the number and the kind of inflectional categories that should be present in a sentence is fixed in Russian, which is not the case for Korean categories. Fifth, the actualization and realization of morphemes is simultaneous in Russian, but sequential in Korean. Their non-obligatoriness casts serious doubts on “functional category” approach to Korean sentential structure. Finally, the term “agglutination”, which has recently been suggested in the literature on Korean morpho-syntax, should be accorded due conceptual interpretation in line with what is suggested in this study.
Abstract
This study investigates characteristic features of the Korean “inflection” in comparison of the Indo-European (particularly, Russian) inflection. The utmost important fact that Korean inflection reveals, as the current study claims, is “non-obligatoriness” of inflectional categories in their actualization in the sentence. They are not something that grammatical rules obligate to be expressed, which is the case for Russian, but something that the speaker chooses for semantic or pragmatic needs. This fact helps to understand some interesting features of Korean “agglutinative” inflection. First, zero expressions cannot be established for Korean morphology. Second, Korean agglutinative morphemes are not part of the phrasal head, but a feature of the whole phrase, which is realized at the end of each (extended) phrase. Third, the semantic/syntactic relation between the preceding phrase and the morpheme, on the one hand, and between the morphemes, on the other, is hierarchical. Fourth, the number and the kind of inflectional categories that should be present in a sentence is fixed in Russian, which is not the case for Korean categories. Fifth, the actualization and realization of morphemes is simultaneous in Russian, but sequential in Korean. Their non-obligatoriness casts serious doubts on “functional category” approach to Korean sentential structure. Finally, the term “agglutination”, which has recently been suggested in the literature on Korean morpho-syntax, should be accorded due conceptual interpretation in line with what is suggested in this study.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김차균, "국어 시제형태소의 의미", 한글, (169) (1980)
- 목정수, "한국어 문법론" (2003), 도서출판 월인
- 시정곤, "선어말어미의 형태-통사론", 한국어학, 8, pp.5~38 (1998)
- 우순조, "국어 어미의 통사적 지위", 국어학, 30, pp.225~256 (1997)
- 임홍빈, "국어 굴절의 원리적 성격과 재구조화: ‘교착소’와 ‘교착법’의 설정을 제안하며", 관악어문, 22, pp.93~163 (1997)
- 최기용, "한국어 격과 조사의 생성통사론" (2009), 한국문화사
- 최동주, "국어 시상체계의 통시적 변화에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1995
- 한학성, "한국어의 AgrP NegP", 언어, 18(2) (1993), 한국언어학회
- Anderson, Stephen, "A-Morphous Morphology" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Aronoff, Mark, "Morphology by Itself" (1994), The MIT Press
- Beard, Robert, "Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology" (1995), SUNY Press
- Boas, Franz, "Language in : General Anthropology" (1938)
- Bybee, Joan L., "Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form" (1985), Benjamins
- Corbett, Greville, "The Morphology-Syntax Interface", Language, 63, pp.299~345 (1987)
- Crystal, David, "A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics" (1990), Basil Blackwell
- Jakobson, Roman, "Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb in : his Selected Writings II", pp.130~147 (1971)
- Jakobson, Roman, "Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances in : his Selected Writings II", pp.239~259 (1971)
- Jakobson, Roman, "Boas' View of Grammatical Meaning in : his Selected Writings II", pp.489~496 (1971), Mouton
- Perlmutter, David, "The Split Morphology Hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish in : Theoretical Morphology", pp.79~100 (1988), Academic Press
- Sadock, Jerrold M., "Autolexical Syntax" (1991), Chicago University Press
- Sapir, Edward, "Language" (1921), Harcourt, Brace, and World
- Sells, Peter, "Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories" (1992), CSLI
- Stump, Gregory T., "Inflection in : The Handbook of Morphology", pp.13~43 (1998), Blackwell Publishers
- Stump, Gregory T., "Inflectional Morphology" (2001), Cambridge University Press