The syntax of ‘sluicing’/‘fragmenting’ in Korean: Evidence from the copula -i- ‘be’
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Building on Park (2001), this paper takes a unified Pseudocleft analysis of the constructions in Korean that apparently correspond to Sluicing and Fragmenting constructions in English. We first bring forth matrix ‘Sluicing’ and ‘Fragmenting’ that require the presence of the copula -i- ‘be’, unlike the instances examined by the previous works. These cases point to the fact that the Pseudocleft analysis of the constructions applies by default. Second, the adnominal adjective (projection) apparently as a survivingexpression is argued not to derive from a clausal source, but base-generated in itsplace like a usual predicate; this is why the adnominal adjective (projection) to beinvestigated here cannot appear together with the copula. Third, the behaviors ofpostposition pied-piping (retention) and postposition stranding (omission) in theconstructions concerned, which have been taken to render compelling evidencesupporting the analysis of the surviving expression as deriving from a clausal source,more effectively follow from the Pseudocleft analysis of them.
Abstract
Building on Park (2001), this paper takes a unified Pseudocleft analysis of the constructions in Korean that apparently correspond to Sluicing and Fragmenting constructions in English. We first bring forth matrix ‘Sluicing’ and ‘Fragmenting’ that require the presence of the copula -i- ‘be’, unlike the instances examined by the previous works. These cases point to the fact that the Pseudocleft analysis of the constructions applies by default. Second, the adnominal adjective (projection) apparently as a survivingexpression is argued not to derive from a clausal source, but base-generated in itsplace like a usual predicate; this is why the adnominal adjective (projection) to beinvestigated here cannot appear together with the copula. Third, the behaviors ofpostposition pied-piping (retention) and postposition stranding (omission) in theconstructions concerned, which have been taken to render compelling evidencesupporting the analysis of the surviving expression as deriving from a clausal source,more effectively follow from the Pseudocleft analysis of them.
참고문헌 (26)
- 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.661~678 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- Chomsky, Noam., "Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Delahunty, Gerald P., "The inferential construction", Pragmatics, 5, pp.341~364 (1995)
- Heggie, Lorie., "The Syntax of Copular Sentences", 박사, pp.1988
- 조정민, "Sluicing? It's Just One of Copular Constructions", 언어학, 13(2), pp.143~167 (2005), 대한언어학회
- Jung-Min Jo, "Word Order Variations in Korean Copular Constructions", 언어학, 15(3), pp.209~238 (2007), 대한언어학회
- Kim, Jeong-Seok., "Sluicing in Japanese and Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), pp.271~290 (2000)
- 김종복, "On the Korean Inferential Cleft Construction", 현대문법연구, 64(64), pp.45~72 (2011), 현대문법학회
- 김종복, "The Korean Sluicing: As a Family of Constructions", 생성문법연구, 23(1), pp.103~130 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- Kennedy, Christopher., "Attributive comparative deletion", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, pp.89~146 (2000)
- Kuwabara, Kazuki., "Report (1) Researching and Verifying an Advanced Theory of Human Language", pp.61~84 (1997), Kanda University of International Studies
- Merchant, Jason., "ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 10", pp.88~112 (1998), Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
- Merchant, Jason., "The Syntax of Silence : Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, Jason., "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Moro, Andrea., "The Raising of Predicates : Predicate Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Nevins, Andrew., "Preposition stranding under sluicing", In Proceedings of Going Romance (2007)
- Korean Linguistics 5, "Japanese", pp.1996, Nishiyama, Kunio.
- Park, Bum-Shik., "Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.317~325 (2005)
- Park, Myung-Kwan., "Subject-less clefts in Korean : Towards a deletion analysis", Language Research, 37(4), pp.715~739 (2001)
- 박명관, "The Syntax of Clausal and Verbal Pro-form", Ellipsis in Korean: Focusing on mit- 'believe' and sayngkakha- 'think' Verbs, 2013, pp.23(2), 221~242[DOI]
- Sohn, Keun-Won., "A non-sluicing, non-cleft approach to copular constructions(written in Korean)", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.267~295 (2000)
- Takahashi, Daiko., "Sluicing in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.241~265 (1994)
- Vicente, Luis., "Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Unpublished manuscript" (2008), UCSC
- 유은정, "A Base-generated Fragment Approach to Sluicing Constructions", 언어학, 21(4), pp.27~56 (2013), 대한언어학회
- Yoon, James., "What the Japanese", Korean copula reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax, Korean Linguistics Conference, pp.2001[DOI]
- Yoon, Junghyoe., "Case drop from Fragment answers in Korean", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 19, pp.277~286 (2013)
