본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Intensifying Adverbial Particle or Emphatic Prefix? A Study of Intensive Adjectives in Mongolic Languages

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Conjectures are made on the origins of linking consonants in Mongolicintensive adjectives. It is argued that Dagur čim čigaan ‘snow-white’ andKhalkha bas bat ‘very firm,’ previously claimed to possess linking /m/ and /s/,are not really intensive adjectives but adjectives modified by intensifyingadverbials čim and bas, which happen to resemble the emphatic prefixesformed by CV-reduplication and addition of linking /m/ or /s/. Two evidencesin support of this claim are adduced: 1) čim and bas are the only examplesin each language that carry such ‘exotic’ linker among Mongolic languages,which generally use only /b/, e.g. čab čagaan ‘snow-white’; 2) a comparativestudy of Turkic and Mongolic intensifiers suggests that Dagur čim is likely tobe related to Turkmen cım in, e.g. Turkmen cım a:k ‘very white’, while basmay be a doublet of Khalkha maš ‘extremely’. The three-way variation oflinker in Kalmuck bim bitü ~ bis bitü ~ biŋ bitü ‘completely closed’, on theother hand, indicates that: 1) the dissimilative constraint preventing default /b/as a linker in labial-initial bases in Mongolic is being relaxed in Kalmuck; 2)the choice of /m/ and /s/ as an alternative linker to the default /b/ is probablydue to influence from neighboring Turkic languages that have linking /m/ and/s; 3) the use of linking /ŋ/ reflects an effort by the Kalmuck speakers toavoid another labial /m/ in compliance of the dissimilation constraint. It isconcluded that Mongolic generally use only /b/ (or its variant /w/) for itslinking consonant, and other apparent linkers are all alternatively explained. Itis hypothesized on this conclusion that if Mongolic borrowed its intensive formation from Turkic, as is generally agreed, it was during the earlyTurco-Mongolic contact and the rule was transferred from non-Oghuz OldTurkic, which, like Mongolic, had default labial /p/ as the only linkingconsonant.

Abstract

Conjectures are made on the origins of linking consonants in Mongolicintensive adjectives. It is argued that Dagur čim čigaan ‘snow-white’ andKhalkha bas bat ‘very firm,’ previously claimed to possess linking /m/ and /s/,are not really intensive adjectives but adjectives modified by intensifyingadverbials čim and bas, which happen to resemble the emphatic prefixesformed by CV-reduplication and addition of linking /m/ or /s/. Two evidencesin support of this claim are adduced: 1) čim and bas are the only examplesin each language that carry such ‘exotic’ linker among Mongolic languages,which generally use only /b/, e.g. čab čagaan ‘snow-white’; 2) a comparativestudy of Turkic and Mongolic intensifiers suggests that Dagur čim is likely tobe related to Turkmen cım in, e.g. Turkmen cım a:k ‘very white’, while basmay be a doublet of Khalkha maš ‘extremely’. The three-way variation oflinker in Kalmuck bim bitü ~ bis bitü ~ biŋ bitü ‘completely closed’, on theother hand, indicates that: 1) the dissimilative constraint preventing default /b/as a linker in labial-initial bases in Mongolic is being relaxed in Kalmuck; 2)the choice of /m/ and /s/ as an alternative linker to the default /b/ is probablydue to influence from neighboring Turkic languages that have linking /m/ and/s; 3) the use of linking /ŋ/ reflects an effort by the Kalmuck speakers toavoid another labial /m/ in compliance of the dissimilation constraint. It isconcluded that Mongolic generally use only /b/ (or its variant /w/) for itslinking consonant, and other apparent linkers are all alternatively explained. Itis hypothesized on this conclusion that if Mongolic borrowed its intensive formation from Turkic, as is generally agreed, it was during the earlyTurco-Mongolic contact and the rule was transferred from non-Oghuz OldTurkic, which, like Mongolic, had default labial /p/ as the only linkingconsonant.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Bosson, James E, "Buriat Reader" (1962), Indiana University Publications
  2. Clark, Larry V, "Turkic Loanwords in Mongol, I: The Treatment of Non-initials s, z, š, č", Central Asiatic Journal, 24(1-2), pp.36~59 (1980)
  3. Clark, Larry, "Turkmen Reference Grammar" (1998), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag
  4. Clauson, Gerard, "An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirtheenth-Century Turkish" (1972), Oxford at the Clarendon Press
  5. Clauson, Gerard, "Studies in Turkic and Mongolic Linguistics" (2002), RoutledgeCurzon
  6. Diffloth, G, "Sound Symbolism", pp.107~114 (1994), Cambridge University Press
  7. Doerfer, Gerhard, "Türkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen: unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung Ǡlterer Neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor Allem der Mongolen-und Timuridenzeit, Vol. 2" (1963), Franz Steiner Verlag
  8. Engkebatu, (1984), Inner Mongolian People’s Press
  9. Field, K. L, "A Grammatical Overview of Santa Mongolian", 박사, pp.1997
  10. Hangin, Gombojab, "A Modern Mongolian-English Dictionary, Bloomington: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies" (1986), Indiana University
  11. Hopper, Paul J, "Grammaticalization" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  12. Hugjiltu, Wu, "One Shared Method to Express Reinforced Meaning of Adjectives in the Altaic Languages", Altai Hakpo, 8, pp.211~225 (1998), The Altaic Society of Korea
  13. Janhunen, Juha, "The Mongolic Languages", pp.1~29 (2003), Routledge
  14. Janhunen, Juha, "Mongolian" (2012), John Benjamins
  15. Jeong, Je Mun, , pp.31~148 (1986), Minumsa
  16. Kara, György, "Dictionary of Sonom Gara’s Erdeni-yin Sang: A Middle Mongol Version of the Tibetan Sa-skya Legs Bshad" (2009), Brill
  17. Kim, Hyung-Soo, "Universal Phonological Processes: A Theoretical analysis of Dissimilation, Cluster Simplification, and their Synergy for Consonant Cluster Reduction in Romance and Indo-European Languages, Vancouver", 박사, pp.1990
  18. Kim, Hyung-Soo, "Dissimilation of Liquids in the So-called rɨ- and rə-Irregular Predicates in Korean", Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 3, pp.381~396 (1994), Hanshin
  19. 김형수, "The Full-to-Partial Reduction in Korean and Turkish Reduplication", 언어연구, 26(2), pp.121~148 (2009), 언어정보연구소
  20. 김형수, "Origins of the so-called irregular intensive adjectives in Turkish", 알타이학보, (23), pp.149~178 (2013), 한국알타이학회
  21. Kim, Hyung-Soo, "Emphatic Reduplication in Turkish: the Multiple Origins of Linking Consonant", Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics (2013), University of Oslo
  22. Kim, Hyung-Soo, "The Shared and Distinct Developments of Emphatic Adjectives in Mongolic: a Comparison with Other Altaic Subgroups", Paper presented at the 11th Seoul International Altaistic Conference (2013)
  23. Kim, Stephen S, "The Mongolic Languages", pp.346~363 (2003), Routledge
  24. Krueger, John R, "Chuvash Manual: Introduction, Grammar, Reader, and Vocabulary" (1961), Indiana University
  25. Lessing, Ferdinand D, "Mongolian-English Dictionary" (1960), Univ. of California Press
  26. Martin, Samuel E, "Dagur Mongolian: Grammar, Texts, and Lexicon" (1961), Indiana University Publications
  27. Nugteren, Hans, "Mongolian Phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu Languages", 박사, pp.2011
  28. O’Sullivan, Patrick A, "Azerbaijani-English Dictionary" (1994), Dunwoody Press
  29. Poppe, Nicholas N, "Grammar of Written Mongolian" (1954), Otto Harrassowitz
  30. Poppe, Nicholas N, "Introduction to Mongolian Comparative Studies" (1955), Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura
  31. Poppe, Nicholas N, "Buriat Grammar" (1960), Indiana University Publications
  32. Ramstedt G. J, "Kalmükische Wörterbuch" (1935), Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura
  33. Ramstedt G. J, "Einführung in die Altaische Sprachwissenschaft II" (1985), Minumsa
  34. Schönig, Claus, "The Mongolic Languages", pp.403~420 (2003), Routledge
  35. 송재목, "한국어와 몽골어의 형용사 어두중첩", 언어학, 59(59), pp.113~128 (2011), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  36. Stachowski, Kamil, "Standard Turkic C-type Reduplications" (2014), Jagiellonian University Press
  37. Starostin, Sergei, "Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages" (2003), Brill
  38. Street, John C, "Dagur Mongolian: Grammar, Texts, and Lexicon, Bloomington: Indiana University Publications", Indiana University Publications, Language, 39(2), pp.336~341 (1963)
  39. Svantesson, "The Phonology of Mongolian" (2005), Oxford University Press
  40. Tolskaya, Maria, "Recent Advances in Tungusic Linguistics", pp.89~122 (2012), Harrassowitz
  41. Tsumagari, Toshiro, "The Mongolic Languages", pp.129~153 (2003), Routledge
  42. Tumurtogoo, D, "Mongolian Monuments in Uighur-Mongolian Script (XIII-XVI Centuries): Introduction, Transcription and Bibliography" (2006), Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica
  43. Wu, Chaolu, "Daur" (1996), LINCOM Europa

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)