소형펀치시험에 의한 TRIP강의 수소 지연파괴 거동
Hydrogen Delayed Fracture of TRIP Steel by Small Punch Test
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The strain-induced phase transformation from austenite to martensite is responsible for the high strength and ductility of TRIP steels. However high strength steels are susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hydrogen on the behavior of hydrogen delayed fracture in TRIP steel with hydrogen charging conditions. The electrochemical hydrogen charging was conducted at each specimen with varying current density and charging time. The relationship between hydrogen concentration and mechanical properties of TRIP steel was established by SP test and SEM fractography. The maximum loads and displacements of the TRIP steel in SP test decreased with increasing hydrogen charging time. The results of SEM fractography investigation revealed typical brittle mode of failure. Thus it was concluded that hydrogen delayed fracture in TRIP steel result from the diffusion of hydrogen through the α' phase.
Abstract
The strain-induced phase transformation from austenite to martensite is responsible for the high strength and ductility of TRIP steels. However high strength steels are susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hydrogen on the behavior of hydrogen delayed fracture in TRIP steel with hydrogen charging conditions. The electrochemical hydrogen charging was conducted at each specimen with varying current density and charging time. The relationship between hydrogen concentration and mechanical properties of TRIP steel was established by SP test and SEM fractography. The maximum loads and displacements of the TRIP steel in SP test decreased with increasing hydrogen charging time. The results of SEM fractography investigation revealed typical brittle mode of failure. Thus it was concluded that hydrogen delayed fracture in TRIP steel result from the diffusion of hydrogen through the α' phase.
참고문헌 (16)
- S. G. Hong, , Scripta Mater, 48, pp.1201~ (2003)
- J. Rassizadehghani, , J. Mater. Sci. Technol, 23, pp.779~ (2007)
- J. W. Park, , KIGAS, 14, pp.38~ (2010)
- 강계명, "수소주입에 따른 590 MPa급 DP강 표면층의 미소경도와 조직특성", 한국재료학회지, 20(11), pp.581~585 (2010), 한국재료학회
- 박재우, "소형펀치시험을 이용한 자동차용 고강도강 수소취성 평가", 한국재료학회지, 22(1), pp.29~34 (2012), 한국재료학회
- V. F. Zackay, , Trans. ASM, 60, pp.252~ (1967)
- D. P. Dantovich, , Metall. Trans, 4A, pp.2627~ (1973)
- C. E. Price, , Acta Metall, 35, pp.1639~ (1987)
- Thorsten Michler, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 35, pp.9746~ (2010)
- M. Koyama, , Corrosion Sci, 54, pp.1~ (2012)
- I. Moro, , Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 527, pp.7252~ (2010)
- 이철치, "고강도 DP강과 TRIP강의 표면 수소 주입량에 따른 수소취성평가", 한국표면공학회지, 45(3), pp.130~135 (2012), 한국표면공학회[DOI]
- 최종운, "미소경도 측정에 의한 590DP강 Subsurface Zone 내 수소취성 평가", 한국재료학회지, 21(11), pp.581~586 (2011), 한국재료학회
- J. Sojka, , Corrosion Sci, 53, pp.2573~ (2011)
- X. Mao, , J. Nucl. Mater, 150, pp.42~ (1987)
- J. P. Hirth, , Metallurg. Trans., 11A, pp.861~ (1980)