Q 방법론을 이용한 예산 황새마을 조성사업의 갈등구조 분석
Conflict Structure Analysis on the Construction of stork Eco-Village in Yesangun Using Q methodology
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ecotourism has the potential to boost the energy of a village as it pays keen attention to the ecosystem and the residents of the village. It is empowered by participation of and cooperation among stakeholders who are closely involved in ecotourism. However, many of them express difficulty in striking a right balance between development and conservation with regard to promoting ecotourism. Against this backdrop, this research paper investigates the structure of conflict that the stakeholders, especially those in Stork Village in Yesan County, South Chungcheong Province of Korea, experience during the process of establishment of government-led ecotourism. In addition, this study examines the problems of government-led ecotourism model and how they can be addressed. To analyze conflict structure, this paper used Q methods and found out that the budget-related stakeholders are largely divided into four groups as who; a) complain about how business profits are distributed; b) secure profits by expanding programs; c) consider human settlement, and; d) broaden people’s participation. The biggest contributor to the conflicts is found that compensation was given discriminately to different jurisdictions. The second finding is that residents became less cooperative when the financial compensation did not live up to their expectation. For instance, they would demand the tourism facility physically expanded, repeatedly complain about the process of the work, and even accuse the government of degrading ecosystem. In other words, unless the compromise is reached with the residents regarding financial compensation, it could be difficult to encourage their participation and develop as a program-oriented tour. Lastly, the tour program needs to induce voluntary participation of the residents and deliver proper information on ecosystem and natural resources so as to last as sustainable ecotourism. The success of ecotourism will be subject to the cooperation of stakeholders in a region, conservation of our fragile ecosystem, and realization of sustainable growth through sharing economic benefits. This study looks into the cause of the conflicts of ecotourism sites and their structure. If this paper can bring about cooperation of stakeholders, the management and operation of ecotourism sites would be more sustainable.
Abstract
Ecotourism has the potential to boost the energy of a village as it pays keen attention to the ecosystem and the residents of the village. It is empowered by participation of and cooperation among stakeholders who are closely involved in ecotourism. However, many of them express difficulty in striking a right balance between development and conservation with regard to promoting ecotourism. Against this backdrop, this research paper investigates the structure of conflict that the stakeholders, especially those in Stork Village in Yesan County, South Chungcheong Province of Korea, experience during the process of establishment of government-led ecotourism. In addition, this study examines the problems of government-led ecotourism model and how they can be addressed. To analyze conflict structure, this paper used Q methods and found out that the budget-related stakeholders are largely divided into four groups as who; a) complain about how business profits are distributed; b) secure profits by expanding programs; c) consider human settlement, and; d) broaden people’s participation. The biggest contributor to the conflicts is found that compensation was given discriminately to different jurisdictions. The second finding is that residents became less cooperative when the financial compensation did not live up to their expectation. For instance, they would demand the tourism facility physically expanded, repeatedly complain about the process of the work, and even accuse the government of degrading ecosystem. In other words, unless the compromise is reached with the residents regarding financial compensation, it could be difficult to encourage their participation and develop as a program-oriented tour. Lastly, the tour program needs to induce voluntary participation of the residents and deliver proper information on ecosystem and natural resources so as to last as sustainable ecotourism. The success of ecotourism will be subject to the cooperation of stakeholders in a region, conservation of our fragile ecosystem, and realization of sustainable growth through sharing economic benefits. This study looks into the cause of the conflicts of ecotourism sites and their structure. If this paper can bring about cooperation of stakeholders, the management and operation of ecotourism sites would be more sustainable.
참고문헌 (25)
- 조중현, "농촌지역개발사업 추진과정에서 표출된 주민 간 갈등의 근거 이론적 해석 : 농촌체험마을 사례를 중심으로", 농촌계획, 14(2), pp.1~12 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
- Chungcheong Today, "Chungnam, Preparing Budget without any Plan", 충청투데이, ~ (2012)
- Coles, T., "Ecotourism, NGOs and Development. A Critical Analysis", Current Issues in Tourism, 12(3), pp.295~296 (2009)
- García-Melón, M., "A Combined ANP-delphi Approach to Evaluate Sustainable Tourism", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 34, pp.41~50 (2012)
- Graci, S., "Collaboration and Partnership Development for Sustainable Tourism", Tourism Geographies, 15(1), pp.25~42 (2013)
- Gurung, D. B, "Community-based Ecotourism in Bhutan: Expert Evaluation of Stakeholder-based Scenarios", The International Journal of Sustainable Development &World Ecology, 15(5), pp.397~411 (2008)
- Hunter, W. C., "Understanding Resident Subjectivities toward Tourism Using Q method:Orchid Island, Taiwan", Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(2), pp.331~354 (2013)
- Jungdo Ilbo, "Yes or No about Yesan Stork Eco-village Development", 중도일보, ~ (2014)
- Kim, H. G, "Q Methodology(Philosophy of Challenges of Planned Eco- tourism: Q Methodology and AHP Analysis for Stakeholders’ Response", Focusing on Maha eco-tourism site in Pyeongchang-gun where 2018 Olympic & Paralympic Winter Games will be held , SPSD conference (2008)
- 김흥규, "Q 방법론 (과학철학, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용)" (2008), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김진, "생태관광활동 참여에 따른 관광환경태도의 변화 - 우포늪 습지 방문객을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 39(1), pp.56~64 (2011), 한국조경학회
- 김정민, "산림기반형 한방치유 관광상품의 선호도에 관한 연구", 한국환경생태학회지, 26(3), pp.463~471 (2012), 한국환경생태학회[DOI]
- Kim, S. E., "Theory and Philosophy of the Q Methodology", Korea Social and Administrative Studies, 20(4), pp.1~25 (2010)
- Kim, S. E., "Q Method & Sociology" (2007), Gold Well Publishing Inc
- Conflict Management in Spatial Development Project ; Exploring People’s Conception and Finding Policy Application, "Korean Research Institute for Humen Settlement", Korean Research Institute for Humen Settlement, ~ (2010)
- Kyunghyang Shinmun, "Stork-village which Attack Storks", ~ (2013)
- 이호영, "생태관광지 유형별 탐방객 특성 및 자연환경 훼손에 대한 인식 비교 연구", 한국환경생태학회지, 26(2), pp.264~272 (2012), 한국환경생태학회[DOI]
- 이재혁, "지속가능한 생태관광을 위한 평가지표 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구", 대한지리학회지, 47(6), pp.853~869 (2012), 대한지리학회
- Lee, J. H., "Current Status and Challenges of Planned Eco- tourism: Q Methodology and AHP Analysis for Stakeholders’ Response, Focusing on Maha eco-tourism site in Pyeongchang-gun where 2018 Olympic & Paralympic Winter Games will be held", SPSD conference (2013)
- 이순자, "Q 방법론을 활용한 갈등행위자 인식유형 및 특성에 관한 연구 : 가로림조력발전소 건설계획을 중심으로", 지방행정연구, 25(2), pp.271~302 (2011), 한국지방행정연구원
- Russell C. Hurd, "The Future of the Q Methodology Movement", Operant Subjectivity, 28(1, pp.2) (2004), 58~96
- White, N. E, "International Handbook on Ecotourism" (2013), Edward Elgar Publishing
- Wunder, S., "Ecotourism and Economic Incentives—an Empirical approach", Ecological Economics, 32(3), pp.465~479 (2000)
- Yesangun, "Regional Plan of Stork Village in Yesan, Chungcheongnamdo", Yesangun, ~ (2012)
- YTN, "Where is stork Restoration Project going", March 31th on 2012, ~ (2012)