사회-생태계 이론을 활용한 경기도 지역 생태계서비스 공급-수요관계 분석
Identifying Supply-demand Relationships on Ecosystem Services Using Socio-ecological Approach in Gyeong-gi Province
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ecosystem services play a role in promoting sustainable development by contributing to human welfare. For sustainable development, a balance between supply and demand for ecosystem services must be made. In this regard, in this study, factor analysis was performed using the results of measuring ecosystem services for the supply of ecosystem services and national statistical data representing socio-economic factors for demand for ecosystem services The results of analysis for Gyeong-gi Province are as follows. The service supply based on the result of ecosystem services was divided into the mixed service provisioning as factor1, the food provisioning as factor2, and the P retention service provisioning area as factor3. As for the demand for services based on socio-economic factors, factor1 is divided into urbanized areas, factor2 is forest development area, and factor3 is agricultural activity development area. Local governments that maintain balance were evaluated as Pocheon, Yangpyeong, Icheon, Pyeongtaek, Goyang, Suwon, Gwangmyeong, and Osan, and imbalanced local governments appeared in Gimpo, Uiwang, Anseong, and Yeoju. A management plan to maintain the balance between supply and demand of ecosystem services was suggested. The analysis method and results of this study are expected to be applicable to various local governments through regional expansion
Abstract
Ecosystem services play a role in promoting sustainable development by contributing to human welfare. For sustainable development, a balance between supply and demand for ecosystem services must be made. In this regard, in this study, factor analysis was performed using the results of measuring ecosystem services for the supply of ecosystem services and national statistical data representing socio-economic factors for demand for ecosystem services The results of analysis for Gyeong-gi Province are as follows. The service supply based on the result of ecosystem services was divided into the mixed service provisioning as factor1, the food provisioning as factor2, and the P retention service provisioning area as factor3. As for the demand for services based on socio-economic factors, factor1 is divided into urbanized areas, factor2 is forest development area, and factor3 is agricultural activity development area. Local governments that maintain balance were evaluated as Pocheon, Yangpyeong, Icheon, Pyeongtaek, Goyang, Suwon, Gwangmyeong, and Osan, and imbalanced local governments appeared in Gimpo, Uiwang, Anseong, and Yeoju. A management plan to maintain the balance between supply and demand of ecosystem services was suggested. The analysis method and results of this study are expected to be applicable to various local governments through regional expansion
참고문헌 (27)
- Baró, F., "Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning : A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region", Land use policy, 57, pp.405~417 (2016)
- Bennett, E. M., "Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being : three challenges for designing research for sustainability", Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 14, pp.76~85 (2015)
- Berkes, F., "Linking Social and Ecological Systems, Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Burkhard, B., "Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets", Ecological indicators, 21, pp.17~29 (2012)
- Castro, A. J., "Social demand for ecosystem services and implications for watershed management", JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 52(1), pp.209~221 (2016)
- Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Pilot Mapping ProjectⅢ, "Choong-Ki Kim", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2020)
- Colding, J., "Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management", AMBIO : A Journal of the Human Environment, 35(5), pp.237~244 (2006)
- Ellis, E. C., "Putting people in the map : anthropogenic biomes of the world", Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), pp.439~447 (2008)
- García-Llorente, M., "Biophysical and sociocultural factors underlying spatial trade-offs of ecosystem services in semiarid watersheds", Ecology and Society, 20(3) (2015)
- Grêt-Regamey, A., "Mountain ecosystem services: who cares?", Mountain Research and Development, 32(S1) (2012)
- "Gyeonggi Province Statistics" (2020)[URL]
- Hamann, M., "Mapping social–ecological systems : Identifying ‘green-loop’and ‘red-loop’dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use", Global Environmental Change, 34, pp.218~226 (2015)
- Hamann, M, "An exploration of human well-being bundles as identifiers of ecosystem service use patterns", PLoS One, 11(10), pp.e0163476~ (2016)
- 김일권, "생태계서비스 번들을 이용한 경기도 도시의 유형화", 환경영향평가, 28(3), pp.201~214 (2019), 한국환경영향평가학회
- A Study on the Evaluation and Improvements of New Town Policies in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, "Kim S", KRIHS, ~ (2020)
- Kaiser, H. F, "The Varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis", Psychometrika, 23, pp.187~200 (1958)
- Lähtinen, K., "Biodiversity and ecosystem services in supply chain management in the global forest industry", Ecosystem Services, 21, pp.130~140 (2016)
- Millenium ecosystem assessment synthesis report, "Millenium Ecosystem Assessment", Island press, ~ (2005)
- Meacham, M., "Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services : what variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrström drainage basin?", Ecology and Society, 21(1) (2016)
- The landscape policy plan(2020-2024), "Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport", ~ (2019)
- Ostrom, E, "A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems", Science, 325(5939), pp.419~422 (2009)
- Quintas-Soriano, C., "Integrating supply and demand in ecosystem service bundles characterization across Mediterranean transformed landscapes", Landscape Ecology, 34(7), pp.1619~1633 (2019)
- Scholes, R. J., "Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social–ecological systems and their ecosystem services", Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), pp.16~25 (2013)
- InVEST User’s Guide, "Sharp, R", Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund, ~ (2020)
- Spake, R., "Unpacking ecosystem service bundles : Towards predictive mapping of syner gies and trade-offs betweene cosystem services", Global Environmental Change, 47, pp.37~50 (2017)
- Wei, H., "Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment : A review", Ecosystem Services, 25, pp.15~27 (2017)
- Wolff, S., "Mapping ecosystem services demand : A review of current research and future perspectives", Ecological Indicators, 55, pp.159~171 (2015)