지역 환경분야 이해당사자 인식을 반영한생태계서비스 우수지역 분석- 안산시를 대상으로 -
Analysis on Ecosystem Service Hotspots Based on Regional Environmental Stakeholders’ Perception – A case study of Ansan –
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
생태계서비스의 개념을 적용한 공간계획을 수립하기 위해서는 생태계서비스 우수지역 파악하고, 이를 관리하는 것이 필요하다. 생태계서비스가 주변보다 높은 지역을 의미하는 생태계서비스 우수지역 평가와 지도화는 생태계서비스를 효과적으로 관리하는데 필요한 정보를 제공한다. 지역 환경분야 이해당사자들의 인식을 반영한 우수지역 평가는 지역에서 관리가 필요한 우선지역을 파악하는데 용이하다. 본 연구는 안산시를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하여 조절서비스별 가중치를 산정하고, 이를 반영하여 조절서비스 우수지역을 파악하였다. 환경분야 이해당사자 분석결과, 조절서비스의 중요도는 수질조절, 대기조절, 침식조절, 기후조절의 순서로 나타났다. 생태계서비스 우수지역은 주로 안산 북동부에 위치한 산림지역에서 나타났다. 이해당사자 가중치를 반영한 경우에도 우수지역의 공간분포는 유사하게 나타났다. 환경분야 이해당사자 인식을 반영한 생태계서비스 우수지역 평가는 지역에서 생태계서비스 관리정책 수립 시의사결정지원도구로서 활용될 수 있다.
Abstract
Identification and mangement of ecosystem service hotspots are necessary to set environmental policies that include concepts of ecosystem service. Assessment and mapping of ecosystem service hotspot referring areas with high amount of ecosystem services provide essential information to manage ecosystem services effectively. Assessment of hotspots based on regional environmental stakeholders’ perception is an useful approach to identify priority areas where management practices are required. This study estimated weights on regulating ecosystem services from regional environmental stakeholders’ surveys in Ansan, and then, identified regulating service hotspots with weights. The result indicated that regulating services are, in order of importance, water quality, air quality, erosion, and climate control. The north-eastern forest of Ansan was mainly revealed as an ecosystem service hotspot. Ecosystem service hotspots were spatially distributed similarly regardless of environmental stakeholders’ weights. Identification of ecosystem service hotspot with environmental stakeholders’ perception can be applied in decision-support tools for ecosystem service management.
참고문헌 (43)
- Alessa L, "Socialecological hotspots mapping : a spatial approach for identifying couple-social ecological space", Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1), pp.27~39 (2008)
- Beverly JL, "Assessing spatial attributes of forest"landscape values : an internet based participatory mapping approach", Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38(2), pp.289~303 (2008)
- Burkhard B, "Ecosystem services-bridging ecology, economy and social sciences", Ecological Complexity, 7, pp.257~259 (2010)
- Cai W, "Identifying hotspots and management of critical ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region, China", Journal of Environmental Management, 191, pp.258~267 (2017)
- Chan KMA, "Conservation planning for ecosystem services", PLos Biology, 4(11), pp.e379~ (2006)
- Cimon-Morin J, "Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning : a review", Biological Conservation, 166, pp.144~154 (2013)
- 조홍래, "복합형 유역모델 STREAM의 개발(I): 모델 구조 및 이론", 한국물환경학회지, 31(5), pp.491~506 (2015), 한국물환경학회
- 최여진, "산업단지 및 주거지역에 대한 환경대기 중 주요 악취물질의 농도특성에 관한 연구 -안산시 반월공단을 중심으로-", 한국지구과학회지, 27(2), pp.209~220 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- Eigenbrod F, "The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services", Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(2), pp.377~385 (2010)
- Fisher B, "Ecosystem services : classification for valuation", Biological Conservation, 141, pp.1167~1169 (2008)
- Früh-Müller A, "Regional patterns of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes", Land, 5(2), pp.17~ (2016)
- Gimona A, "Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions : a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland", Landscape Ecology, 22(8), pp.1255~1264 (2007)
- 허종원, "안산지역 대기 중 다이옥신 및 dl-PCBs의 오염특성 조사", 한국대기환경학회지, 26(5), pp.517~532 (2010), 한국대기환경학회
- 정강호, "수치 정밀토양에 기초한 전국 토양유실량의 평가를 위한 USLE", RUSLE 인자의 산정, 2004, pp.37(4), 199~206[DOI]
- 정건화, "산업지구론의 관점에서 본 산업도시 안산의 형성, 발전과 위기", 지역사회연구, 14(1), pp.49~70 (2006), 한국지역사회학회
- KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute), "The lungs of the City, urban forests", pp.64~ (2017), Korea Forest Research Institute
- 구미현, "택지개발사업 생태계서비스 평가모형 개발 및 적용 : 4개 보금자리주택지구를 사례로", 박사, 협동과정 조경학전공, pp.2014
- Kopperoinen L, "Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology", Landscape Ecology, 29, pp.1361~1375 (2014)
- Koschke L, "A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning", Ecological Indicators, 21, pp.54~66 (2012)
- Lautenbach S, "Mapping water quality-related ecosystem services: concepts and applications for nitrogen retention and pesticide risk reduction", International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services &Management, 8(1-2), pp.35~49 (2012)
- 이혜경, "시화호 간척개발사업과 환경관리정책의 변화", 환경법과 정책, 9, pp.153~173 (2012), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
- Liu J, "Ecosystem services insights into water resources management in China : a case of Xi’an city", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(12), pp.1169~ (2016)
- Locatelli B, "Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica", Environmental Conservation, 41(1), pp.27~36 (2014)
- Luck GW, "Identifying spatial priorities for protecting ecosystem services", F1000Research, 1, pp.17~ (2012)
- MA (Millenium Assessment), "Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis" (2005), Island Press
- Maes J, "Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union", Ecosystem Services, 1(1), pp.31~39 (2012)
- Martin-López B, "Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences", PlosOne, 7(6), pp.e38970~ (2012)
- Meyer MA, "Do ecosystem services provide an added value compared to existing forest planning approaches in Central Europe?", Ecology and Society, 22(3), pp.6~ (2017)
- 남윤섭, "AHP를 이용한 MICE 다목적홀 입지선정에 관한 연구 - 제주지역을 중심으로 -", 국토지리학회지, 45(4), pp.125~136 (2011), 국토지리학회
- NIE (National Institute of Ecology), "Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services", pp.403~ (2017), National Institute of Ecology
- Queiroz C, "Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape", Ambio, 44(1), pp.89~101 (2015)
- Quyen NTK, "Stakeholders’ perceptions of ecosystem services and Pangasius catfish farming development along the Hau River in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam", Ecosystem Service, 25, pp.2~14 (2017)
- Raudsepp-Hearne C, "Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes", Proceedings of National Academic Society, 107(11), pp.5242~5247 (2010)
- Renard KG, "Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agricultural Handbook 703" (1997), US Government Print Office
- 노영희, "제주 생태계 조절서비스의 시계열적 변화: 탄소고정량 추정 및 경제성 평가를 중심으로", 환경정책, 24(2), pp.29~44 (2016), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
- Saaty TL, "Multiple criteria decision analysis", pp.345~407 (2005)
- Schlup CJE, "Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services : demand and supply of pollination in the European Union", Ecological Indicators, 36, pp.131~141 (2014)
- Schröter M, "Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services : comparing hotspots with heuristic optimization", Landscape Ecology, 31(2), pp.431~450 (2016)
- Tidball KG, "Toward an ecology of environmental education and learning", Ecosphere, 2(2), pp.1~17 (2011)
- Willemen L, "Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region", Ecological Indicators, 10(1), pp.62~73 (2010)
- 윤성철, "식생보호를 위한 한계농도 누적 지표로 본 1998-2002년도의 우리나라 대기권 오존 오염", 한국농림기상학회지, 6(1), pp.38~48 (2004), 한국농림기상학회
- Zank B, "Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows : a case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA", Landscape and Urban Planning, 149, pp.31~42 (2016)
- Zhang X, "Multiple criteria evaluation of ecosystem services for the Ruoergai Plateau Marshes in southewest China", Ecological Economics, 69(7), pp.1463~1470 (2010)