A Review of Ecosystem Service Studies: Concept, Approach and Future Work in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In South Korea, the conflict between development and conservation policy still exist among government ministries, and conventional development plan often has priority over conservation policy. Establishment of sustainable development and comprehensive management policy employing the results of ecosystem service studies are highly warranted, but researchers in South Korea are still limited and often misuse the concept of ecosystem services. Thus, we aimed to introduce the concept of Ecosystem Service (ES) and related terminologies such as Social-Ecological Systems (SESs), ecosystem function, trade-off, and human well-being in this paper. Additionally, this article reviewed and arranged key approaches in ES studies as follows: 1) field works, 2) mapping ecosystem services, 3) valuing ES, 4) quantifying trade-offs between ES and 5) understanding SESs. Based on those results, we suggest that field works for basic information have the first priority to be conducted among ES studies. Once basic information is sufficiently accumulated, researchers can perform applied ES research with accuracy. Finally, results of ES studies conducted by five approaches allow decision makers to consider both natural system and society simultaneously, and hence the results can be utilized for sustainable development and conservation policy based on ecosystem-based management.
Abstract
In South Korea, the conflict between development and conservation policy still exist among government ministries, and conventional development plan often has priority over conservation policy. Establishment of sustainable development and comprehensive management policy employing the results of ecosystem service studies are highly warranted, but researchers in South Korea are still limited and often misuse the concept of ecosystem services. Thus, we aimed to introduce the concept of Ecosystem Service (ES) and related terminologies such as Social-Ecological Systems (SESs), ecosystem function, trade-off, and human well-being in this paper. Additionally, this article reviewed and arranged key approaches in ES studies as follows: 1) field works, 2) mapping ecosystem services, 3) valuing ES, 4) quantifying trade-offs between ES and 5) understanding SESs. Based on those results, we suggest that field works for basic information have the first priority to be conducted among ES studies. Once basic information is sufficiently accumulated, researchers can perform applied ES research with accuracy. Finally, results of ES studies conducted by five approaches allow decision makers to consider both natural system and society simultaneously, and hence the results can be utilized for sustainable development and conservation policy based on ecosystem-based management.
참고문헌 (60)
- Ahn HY, "Ecosystem service value assessment by change of land cover area in South korea", 202~208 (2010)
- Construction of an environmental valuation database and analysis of valuation studies of Korea 3, "Ahn SS", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2011)
- Alessa L, "Social-ecological hotspots mapping : A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space", Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, pp.27~39 (2008)
- Barbier EB, "Progress and Challenges in Valuing Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Services", Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6, pp.1~19 (2012)
- Barbier EB, "The value of estuarine and coastal eco system services", Ecological Monographs, 81, pp.169~193 (2011)
- Carpenter SR, "Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, pp.1305~1312 (2009)
- Champ PA, "A primer on nonmarket valuation" (2003), Springer
- Chan KM, "Characterizing changes in marine ecosystem services", F1000 biology reports, 2, pp.54~ (2010)
- Chung MG, "Mapping ecosystem services and statistical analysis for Ecosystem-Based Management of coastal areas, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering", 석사, pp.2012
- Costanza R, "The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital", Nature, 387, pp.253~260 (1997)
- Costanza R, "Valuing ecological systems and services", Valuing ecological systems and services, 3, pp.14~ (2011)
- Dahl R, "Marine Spatial Planning, A Step-by-Step Approach toward Ecosystem-based Management", IOC Manuals and Guides 53, ~ (2009)
- Davies ZG, "Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale", Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, pp.1125~1134 (2011)
- Daw T, "Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being", Environmental Conservation, 38, pp.370~379 (2011)
- De Groot RS, "Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making" (1992), Wolters-Noordhoff Groningen
- De Groot RS, "A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services", Ecological Economics, 41, pp.393~408 (2002)
- Assessment of Ecological Services Derived from US Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley : Regional Estimates and Functional Condition Indicator Models. Interim Report. Washington, DC : USDA NRCS, "Faulkner S", USDA NRCS, ~ (2008)
- Finlayson M, "Ecosystems and human well-being : wetlands and water synthesis." (2005), Island Press
- Freeman AM., "The measurement of environmental and resource values : theory and methods" (2003), Resources for the Future
- Freeman Iii AM., "The measurements of environmental and resource values : theory and methods" (2003), RFF press
- Goldstein JH, "Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, pp.7565~7570 (2012)
- Hope D, "Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, pp.8788~8792 (2003)
- Horwitz P, "Wetlands as settings for human health : Incorporating ecosystem services and health impact assessment into water resource management", BioScience, 61, pp.678~688 (2011)
- Jenkins WA, "Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley", Ecological Economics, 69, pp.1051~1061 (2010)
- Kareiva P, "Domesticated nature : Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare", Science, 316, pp.1866~1869 (2007)
- Koch EW, "Non-linearity in ecosystem services : temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection", Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, pp.29~37 (2009)
- "Environmental Valuation Information System" (2012)[URL]
- "Korean Statistical Information Service" (2012)[URL]
- "Statistical Geographic Information Service" (2012)[URL]
- Lenton TM, "Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, pp.1786~ (2008)
- Lester SE, "Science in support of ecosystem-based management for the US West Coast and beyond", Biological Conservation, 143, pp.576~587 (2010)
- Li J, "Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, pp.7721~ (2011)
- Liu JG, "Complexity of coupled human and natural systems", Science, 317, pp.1513~1516 (2007)
- Liu JG, "Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.9477~9482 (2008)
- Luisetti T, "Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England", Ocean & Coastal Management, 54, pp.212~224 (2011)
- McLeod K, "Ecosystem-Based Management for the oceans" (2009), Island Press Washington DC
- McSweeney K, "Climate-related disaster opens a window of opportunity for rural poor in northeastern Honduras", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, pp.5203~5208 (2011)
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, "Ecosystems and human well-being , In Ecosystems and human well-being" (2005), Island Press
- A basic operational plan of the National Ecological Institute, "Ministry of Environment", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2012)
- "Environment Geographic Information System" (2012)[URL]
- "Coastal Management Information System" (2012)[URL]
- "Korean Tidalflat Information System" (2012)[URL]
- "National Spatial Information Clearinghouse" (2012)[URL]
- Montzka SA, "Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change", Nature, 476, pp.43~50 (2011)
- Ostrom E, "A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems", Science, 325, pp.419~422 (2009)
- Perrings C, "Ecosystem Services for 2020", Science, 330, pp.323~324 (2010)
- Polasky S, "impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the state of Minnesota", Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, pp.219~242 (2011)
- Raymond CM, "Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services", Ecological Economics, 68, pp.1301~1315 (2009)
- Redman CL, "Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change", Ecosystems, 7, pp.161~171 (2004)
- Rockstrom J, "A safe operating space for humanity", Nature, 461, pp.472~475 (2009)
- Rodríguez JP, "Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services", Ecology and Society, 11, pp.28~ (2006)
- Scheffer M, "Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems", Nature, 413, pp.591~596 (2001)
- Seppelt R, "A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies : approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead", Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, pp.630~636 (2011)
- Sherrouse BC, "A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services", Applied Geography, 31, pp.748~760 (2011)
- Smith RI, "The role of statistics in the analysis of ecosystem services", Environmetrics, 22, pp.608~617 (2011)
- The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity : mainstreaming the economics of nature : a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB, "Sukhdev P", TEEB, ~ (2010)
- Tallis HT, "Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs", The Natural Capital Project, Stanford, ~ (2011)
- Wackernagel M, "Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: Comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach", Land Use Policy, 21, pp.261~269 (2004)
- Yackulic CB, "Biophysical and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Forest Transitions at Multiple Spatial and Temporal Scales", Ecology and Society, 16, pp.15~ (2011)
- Ziv G, "Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, pp.5609~5614 (2012)