본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

게임이론에 의한 양면시장에서의 망중립성 분석

Analysis of Network Neutrality in Two-sided Markets Using Game Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

Net neutrality, which has not been a problem, has recently become a problem for ISPs (Internet Service Providers), and their complaints have been paid by domestic platform companies, but overseas global IT companies such as Google and YouTube, generate huge revenues from domestic markets. In this situation, domestic IT companies claim that it is natural to impose more expensive charges or restrict speed on users who generate huge traffic. On the other side, however, the telecommunication network has become an essential public good that is essential to our everyday life, and because it has been given a monopoly position by a private company to efficiently respond to the explosive demand for telecommunication services, It is necessary to provide equal and universal service and fulfill public duty. In this paper, we deal with the network neutrality problem, focusing on the price elasticity between the CP (Contents Provider) and the ISP, rather than the user who is one side of the two-sided market for the already saturated satellites communication market. We present a game model that determines the optimal price for each platform by Nash equilibrium and analyze how the net neutrality affects CP according to the change of exogenous variables through the proposed game model.

Abstract

Net neutrality, which has not been a problem, has recently become a problem for ISPs (Internet Service Providers), and their complaints have been paid by domestic platform companies, but overseas global IT companies such as Google and YouTube, generate huge revenues from domestic markets. In this situation, domestic IT companies claim that it is natural to impose more expensive charges or restrict speed on users who generate huge traffic. On the other side, however, the telecommunication network has become an essential public good that is essential to our everyday life, and because it has been given a monopoly position by a private company to efficiently respond to the explosive demand for telecommunication services, It is necessary to provide equal and universal service and fulfill public duty. In this paper, we deal with the network neutrality problem, focusing on the price elasticity between the CP (Contents Provider) and the ISP, rather than the user who is one side of the two-sided market for the already saturated satellites communication market. We present a game model that determines the optimal price for each platform by Nash equilibrium and analyze how the net neutrality affects CP according to the change of exogenous variables through the proposed game model.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Armstrong, M., "Competition in Two-Sided Markets" (2004), Mimeo
  2. Caillaud, B., "Chicken and Egg : Competition among Intermediation Service Providers", The Rand Journal of Economics, 34(2), pp.309~328 (2003)[DOI]
  3. Net Neutrality on the Internet : A Two-Sided Market Analysis, Working Paper #07-40, "Economies, N.", NYU Center for Law and Economics, ~ (2007)
  4. Eisenmannn, T., "Strategies for Two-Sided Markets", Harvard Business Review, 84(10), pp.2~11 (2006)
  5. Evans, D.S., "The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets", Yale Journal on Regulation, 20(2), pp.325~382 (2003)
  6. Proprietary vs. Open Two-Sided Platforms and Social Efficiency, Working Paper 06-12, "Hagiu, A.", AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulation Studies, ~ (2006)
  7. Hahn, R., "The Economics of Net Neutrality", The Economists' Voice, 3(6), pp.1~7 (2006)
  8. 장대철, "양면시장에서의 진입가능성 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 31(4), pp.105~123 (2006), 한국경영과학회
  9. 정충영, "트래픽 혼잡과 양면시장하에 있는 경쟁적 인터넷망 사업자의 접속료 규제효과", 한국통신학회논문지, 42(7), pp.1380~1391 (2017), 한국통신학회[DOI]
  10. Kang, Y.R., "IP interconnection disputes between France Telecom and Cogent", ICT Policy Trends, 25(5), pp.71~79 (2013)
  11. Kim, A.R., "IPTV Service under Net Neutrality : A Two-sided Market Analysis", pp.2008
  12. 김도훈, "독점적 망사업자에 대한 망중립성 정책의 타당성 분석: 양면시장 관점에서 본 망중립성 이슈", 정보통신정책연구, 16(2), pp.1~45 (2009), 정보통신정책학회
  13. 김성환, "망중립성의 배경 및 이론의 이해", 정보통신정책연구, 15(1), pp.95~133 (2008), 정보통신정책학회
  14. 김태기, "게임모형을 이용한 두 항만간 가격경쟁에 관한 연구", 한국항만경제학회지, 25(3), pp.251~268 (2009), 한국항만경제학회
  15. Musacchio, J., "A Two-Sided Market Analysis of Provider Investment Incentives with an Application to the Net-Neutrality Issue", Review of Network Economics, 8(1), pp.22~39 (2009)
  16. Rochet, J.C., "Two-Sided Markets : An Overview" (2004), Mimeo
  17. Rosen, R., "Two-Sided Markets : A Tentative Survey", Review of Network Economics, 4(2), pp.142~160 (2005)
  18. van Schewick, B., "Towards an Economic Framework for Network Neutrality Regulation", Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 5(2), pp.329~392 (2007)
  19. Wu, T., "Keeping the Internet Neutral? : Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate", Federal Communications Law Journal, 59(3) (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)