Kano 모델 기반의 잠재적 고객 요구 개선 지수의 개발 : 교육서비스 분야를 중심으로
Development of Potential Customer Demand Improvement Index Based on Kano Model : Focused on Educational Service
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, service quality must reflect several demands of customers who show rapid and various changes so as to be compared with the past. So, objective and rapid measuring methods for service quality are necessary. For them, first of all, service company must calculate their standard of service quality accurately by measuring service quality exactly. Kano classified the degree of influence that is the degree of correspondence of the quality attributes of products and services to the subjective satisfaction of customers. As a result, the types of qualities are classified as attractive, must be, one dimensional, and indifference attributes. They have been widely used quality attributes in various industrial fields up to now. However, Kano model has a limit that it ignores the characters of the next frequent numbers even though there are not much gap comparing to the most frequent number in the questionnaire answers. The limit is attributed to the character of Kano model that the most frequent number is accepted as the only quality character. Timko calculated the customer satisfaction coefficient by using Kano’s method and studied the differences in quality character by classifying the quality characteristics in a graphical way through the relationship between the satisfaction and the dissatisfaction coefficient. In this study, we used the quality level determination method of the 7-point Likert scale, which takes the weight into account, to complement the deficiencies of the existing Kano model. We also developed and applied a Potential Satisfaction Level (P) and Potential Customer Demand Improvement (PCDI) Index to present a new approach to the determination of service quality attributes. To measure the level of potential service satisfaction and to understand the degree of improvement, we collected specimens of 51 participants who has been trained in the National Strategy Business Training Program, which has been managed by government agent, and analyzed the results.1)
Abstract
Recently, service quality must reflect several demands of customers who show rapid and various changes so as to be compared with the past. So, objective and rapid measuring methods for service quality are necessary. For them, first of all, service company must calculate their standard of service quality accurately by measuring service quality exactly. Kano classified the degree of influence that is the degree of correspondence of the quality attributes of products and services to the subjective satisfaction of customers. As a result, the types of qualities are classified as attractive, must be, one dimensional, and indifference attributes. They have been widely used quality attributes in various industrial fields up to now. However, Kano model has a limit that it ignores the characters of the next frequent numbers even though there are not much gap comparing to the most frequent number in the questionnaire answers. The limit is attributed to the character of Kano model that the most frequent number is accepted as the only quality character. Timko calculated the customer satisfaction coefficient by using Kano’s method and studied the differences in quality character by classifying the quality characteristics in a graphical way through the relationship between the satisfaction and the dissatisfaction coefficient. In this study, we used the quality level determination method of the 7-point Likert scale, which takes the weight into account, to complement the deficiencies of the existing Kano model. We also developed and applied a Potential Satisfaction Level (P) and Potential Customer Demand Improvement (PCDI) Index to present a new approach to the determination of service quality attributes. To measure the level of potential service satisfaction and to understand the degree of improvement, we collected specimens of 51 participants who has been trained in the National Strategy Business Training Program, which has been managed by government agent, and analyzed the results.1)
참고문헌 (22)
- 배대석, "잠수함 승조원의 이직의도 요인 분석을 통한 정책방안제시 - Kano모델을 이용하여 -", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(8), pp.4950~4960 (2014), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Berger, C., "Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality", The Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), pp.1~37 (1993)
- Franceschini, F., "An application of quality function deployment to industrial training courses", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(7), pp.753~768 (1998)[DOI]
- Garibay, C., "Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment (QFD) and the Kano model", The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2), pp.125~132 (2010)[DOI]
- Hejaili, F.F., "Culture-Related Service Expectations : A Comparative Study Using the Kano Model", Q Manage Health Care, 18(1), pp.48~58 (2009)[DOI]
- Hostro, C., "How to create attractive and unique customer experiences : An application of Kano's theory of attractive quality to recreational tourism", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(4), pp.385~402 (2010)[DOI]
- Hsu, C.H., "Integrating Kano model into quality function deploymentto facilitate decision analysis for service quality", International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Business and Economics (2007)
- 장흥엽, "ASC를 이용한 품질특성의 중요도 결정", 품질경영학회지, 40(4), pp.589~598 (2012), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality", Hinshitsu, 14(2), pp.147~156 (1984)
- 김태운, "수정된 Kano 모델을 이용한 스마트 폰의 품질특성 평가", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 35(1), pp.57~65 (2012), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- Leam, S.U., "Development and Application of a Potential Customer Satisfaction Improvement Index Based on Kano Model", pp.2005
- Lee, M.C., "Applying the Kano methodology to meet customer requirements : NASA' microgravity science program", Quality Management Journal, 4(5), pp.95~106 (1997)[DOI]
- Lee, Y.C., "Quality function deployment implementation based on fuzzy Kano model : An application in PLM system", Computer & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), pp.48~63 (2008)[DOI]
- Lofgren, M., "Two decades of using Kano's theory of attractive quality : a literature review", Quality Management Journal, 15(1), pp.59~75 (2008)
- Matzler, K., "How to delight your customers", Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), pp.6~18 (1996)
- 문경원, "Kano-QFD 통합모형에서의 고객 요구속성 중요도 산정", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 37(1), pp.68~78 (2014), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- Oh, S.I., "An Empirical Study on the Improvement of Education Service Quality using Potential Customer Demand Improvement(PCDI) Index", pp.2016
- Sauerwein, E., "Experiences with the reliability and validity of the Kano-method : comparison to alternate forms of classification of product requirements", The Eleventh Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, pp.416~429 (1999)
- Shahin, A., "Kano model : A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines", Total Quality Management, 20(9), pp.1003~1028 (2009)[DOI]
- Song, H.G., "Developing and utilizing the B-W model for managing quality attributes", pp.2013
- Tam, K.C., "Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment", Total Quality Management, 11(8), pp.1141~1151 (2000)
- Timko, M., "An experimentin continuous analysis, In D.Walden(Ed.), Kano's methods for understanding customer- defined quality", The Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), pp.17~20 (1993)