본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

스마트시티 프로젝트 이해관계자 간의 목표 우선순위에 대한 연구: AHP 방법론의 적용을 중심으로

A Study on Priority Goals of Stakeholders for Smart City Projects: An Application of AHP Methodology

이아연|박소현|김승철|이태원
한국산업경영시스템학회 (KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING)|2022.09|한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)|제45권 제3호|pp. 173-185

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Analytic Hierarchy ProcessSmart CityProject StakeholdersStrategic Priority
주제분류산업공학

초록

For the smooth implementation and success of smart city projects, it is necessary to recognize that there is a difference in the perception of value judgments or strategic goals among major stakeholders in the planning process. And it is necessary to aim the values and goals of smart cities through reconciliation of these differences. The two major stakeholders in the smart city development project are citizens group and government officials group. Government officials are in charge of establishing and implementing policies for smart city projects, and their value judgments and perceptions influence the policy direction. In these respects, government officials can be an important stakeholder group. Citizens are a group that includes ordinary residents and business owners who live in smart cities and are the ultimate users of infrastructure and facilities. This study investigated the importance perceptions of citizens and government officials, who are the major stakeholders, about the core values and strategic goals that the smart city project aims. Responses were collected using a structured questionnaire to which the AHP methodology was applied. And the priority of perceptions for constituent items was compared for each stakeholder group. Through the comparative analysis results, it was empirically confirmed that there is a difference in the values and goals pursued by the smart city project between stakeholder groups. As an empirical study on the stakeholders of the smart city project, this study is meaningful in contributing to the theoretical development in that it suggests that the conceptual structural model of the smart city strategy system presented in previous studies can be applied in practice.

Abstract

For the smooth implementation and success of smart city projects, it is necessary to recognize that there is a difference in the perception of value judgments or strategic goals among major stakeholders in the planning process. And it is necessary to aim the values and goals of smart cities through reconciliation of these differences. The two major stakeholders in the smart city development project are citizens group and government officials group. Government officials are in charge of establishing and implementing policies for smart city projects, and their value judgments and perceptions influence the policy direction. In these respects, government officials can be an important stakeholder group. Citizens are a group that includes ordinary residents and business owners who live in smart cities and are the ultimate users of infrastructure and facilities. This study investigated the importance perceptions of citizens and government officials, who are the major stakeholders, about the core values and strategic goals that the smart city project aims. Responses were collected using a structured questionnaire to which the AHP methodology was applied. And the priority of perceptions for constituent items was compared for each stakeholder group. Through the comparative analysis results, it was empirically confirmed that there is a difference in the values and goals pursued by the smart city project between stakeholder groups. As an empirical study on the stakeholders of the smart city project, this study is meaningful in contributing to the theoretical development in that it suggests that the conceptual structural model of the smart city strategy system presented in previous studies can be applied in practice.

참고문헌 (83)

  1. Abella, A, "A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities’ ecosystems", Cities, 64, pp.47~53 (2017)
  2. Albino, V, "Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives", Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), pp.3~21 (2015)
  3. "Amsterdam Smart City Website"[URL]
  4. Aurigi, A, "Competing urban visions and the shaping of the digital city", Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 18(1), pp.12~26 (2005)
  5. Angelidou, M, "Smart city policies: A spatial approach", Cities, 41, pp.S3~S11 (2014)
  6. Bakici, T, "A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona", Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), pp.135~148 (2013)
  7. Bhatta, B, "Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Kolkata, India", International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(18), pp.4733~4746 (2009)
  8. Bakici, T, "A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona", Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), pp.135~148 (2013)
  9. Bell, S, "Smart cities and M3:rapid research, meaningful metrics and co-design", Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31(1), pp.27~53 (2018)
  10. Busan Metropolitan City, "Vision and Strategy of Busan Smart City" (2018)
  11. Capra, C.F, "The Smart City and its citizens: Governance and citizen participation in Amsterdam Smart City", International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 5(1), pp.20~38 (2016)
  12. 최민주, "시민참여 기반의 스마트시티 리빙랩 모델 설정", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 20(4), pp.284~294 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  13. Cohen, B, "Municipal demand-side policy tools and the strategic management of technology life cycles", Technovation, 34(12), pp.797~806 (2014)
  14. Daegu Metropolitan City, "Daegu Metropolitan City Smart City Plan" (2021)
  15. Daejeon Sejong Research Institute, "Establishment of smart city model based on citizen participation" (2018)
  16. Dirks, S, "A vision of smarter cities:How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future,", IBM Institute for Business Value, 8 (2009)
  17. G-SSC, I.T.U.T, "ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities", Workshop Report, 10, pp.2014~ (2014)
  18. "Global U-City Trends and Prospects", ~ (2014)
  19. Graham, L.J, "To educate you to be smart’: Disaffected students and the purpose of school in the (not so clever) lucky country", Journal of Education Policy, 30(2), pp.237~257 (2015)
  20. Giffinger, R, "Smart cities:Ranking of European medium-sized cities" (2007), Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology
  21. Gyonggi Research Institute, "A Study of Smart city Strategy in the Era of 4th Industrial Revolution", pp.1~235 (2018)
  22. Hamblen, M, "Just what IS a smart city" (2015), Computerworld
  23. 한선희, "국내 스마트시티 인증 지표 및 시범 인증에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 19(1), pp.688~698 (2018), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  24. Harrison, C, "A theory of smart cities", Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011 (2011)
  25. Heaton, J, "A conceptual framework for the alignment of infrastructure assets to citizen requirements within a Smart Cities framework", Cities, 90, pp.32~41 (2019)
  26. 황서이, "국내 언론에 나타난‘스마트시티’이슈의 의미연결망분석", 디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 21(5), pp.941~950 (2020), 한국디지털콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  27. Iannone, R, "Smart Society", A Sociological Perspective on Smart Living (2019)
  28. 장환영, "융․복합형 스마트시티 서비스 활성화를 위한 우선순위 분석에 관한 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(8), pp.152~161 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  29. 장환영, "스마트시티 리빙랩의 사업적 쟁점과 대응 방안", 한국도시지리학회지, 23(1), pp.45~57 (2020), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
  30. 장환영, "스마트시티 거버넌스와 부처 간 협력방향에 관한 연구: 국토교통부와 미래창조과학부를 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(5), pp.430~439 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  31. 주윤창, "스마트시티 연구동향 분석", 한국지역정보화학회지, 23(2), pp.149~172 (2020), 한국지역정보화학회[DOI]
  32. JeffFrazier, "Transforming the City of New York", Cisco IBSG, ~ (2012)
  33. Jesep-Ramon Ferrer, "Barcelona’s Smart City vision: an opportunity for transformation" (2017), Institut Veolia
  34. 강훈, "AHP를 활용한 지방자치단체 평생교육기관 평가요인의 중요도 분석", 열린교육연구, 26(3), pp.27~47 (2018), 한국열린교육학회[DOI]
  35. 강하은, "AHP를 활용한 스마트시티 사업의 전략적 우선순위 분석: 잠재적 주민을 대상으로", 디지털융복합연구, 19(12), pp.243~253 (2021), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  36. Kang, M.G, "Smart City-Concept and Meaning", World and Cities, 9, pp.20~27 (2015)
  37. Kim, C.G, "A Priority Analysis on Corporate Resource Allocation through Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)", Journal of Regional Studies and Development, 8(1), pp.109~125 (2008)
  38. 김동현, "AHP를 활용한 온라인 화장품 몰에서 제품구매 시 선택속성에 관한 연구", 경영교육연구, 33(3), pp.387~406 (2018), 한국경영교육학회[DOI]
  39. 김동환, "AHP기법을 이용한 농식품 유통법인 경영진단지표 개발", 유통과학연구, 15(12), pp.95~102 (2017), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  40. 곽진조, "한국의 u-City서비스 품질이 고객만족에 미치는 영향 : 공공서비스를 중심으로", 한국전자통신학회 논문지, 8(9), pp.1351~1358 (2013), 한국전자통신학회
  41. 김기봉, "4차 산업혁명시대의 스마트시티 현황과 전망", 한국융합학회논문지, 9(9), pp.191~197 (2018), 한국융합학회[DOI]
  42. 김승래, "스마트시티 구축에 관한 정책과 법제연구", 법학연구, 19(4), pp.163~202 (2019), 한국법학회
  43. 이충효, "스마트시티에서의 도시물류시스템 기술개발 우선순위 도출에 관한 연구", 기업경영리뷰, 11(2), pp.45~56 (2020), KNU 기업경영연구소
  44. Lee, M.S, "Internet of Things (IoT)-based Smart City Demonstration Service Main Status and Cases", The Proceeding of the KITC, 34(9), pp.3~8 (2017)
  45. 이세규, "유시티 개발에 대한 지역주민 충성도의 영향요인에 관한 연구: 서울시 은평구 진관동을 사례지역으로", 서울도시연구, 12(2), pp.87~104 (2011), 서울연구원[DOI]
  46. 이승욱, "스마트시티 거버넌스에 대한 비판적 고찰: 중국의 스마트시티 정책을 사례로", 공간과 사회, 29(4), pp.271~322 (2019), 한국공간환경학회[DOI]
  47. 이상호, "스마트시티 거버넌스 특성 분석", 한국지리정보학회지, 19(2), pp.86~97 (2016), 한국지리정보학회[DOI]
  48. 이재용, "스마트시티 정책추진 변화와 지자체 대응 분석", 한국도시지리학회지, 22(2), pp.1~11 (2019), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
  49. 이용규, "유시티(u-City) 공공서비스 만족도 분석 -화성시 동탄동의 유서비스를 중심으로 -", GRI연구논총, 11(2), pp.91~111 (2009), 재단법인 경기연구원
  50. Martin, C.J, "Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, pp.269~278 (2018)
  51. Monzon, A, "Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects", 2015 international conference on smart cities and green ICT systems (SMARTGREENS), pp.1~11 (2015), IEEE
  52. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Sejong Smart City National Demonstration City Implementation Plan" (2019)
  53. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "The 3rd Smart City Master Plan: 2019~2023" (2019)
  54. 문승혁, "스마트 시티의 발전을 위한 빅데이터 플랫폼 구축과 적용", 문화기술의 융합, 6(2), pp.529~534 (2020), 국제문화기술진흥원
  55. 남광우, "스마트시티 거버넌스의 조직체계와 역할", 지역연구, 33(1), pp.69~85 (2017), 한국지역학회
  56. Neirotti, P, "Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts", Cities, 38, pp.25~36 (2014)
  57. "New York NYCEDC"[URL]
  58. Offenhuber, D, "Improstructure-an improvisational perspective on smart infrastructure governance", Cities, 72, pp.329~338 (2018)
  59. Paroutis, S, "A strategic view on smart city technology: The case of IBM Smarter Cities during a recession", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, pp.262~272 (2014)
  60. 박철형, "AHP–군집분석을 이용한 주요어종의 자원감소 원인 비교분석에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, 40(3), pp.127~146 (2009), 한국수산경영학회
  61. 박경종, "스마트 시티의 7계층 평가를 통한 합리적인 스마트 시티 선정 연구", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 9(6), pp.691~699 (2019), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  62. Park, J.T, "IoT-based healthcare service and platform trends", Information and Communications Magazine, 31(12), pp.25~30 (2014)
  63. Park, Y.S, "Decision-making theory and practice by AHP" (2009), Kyowoosa
  64. Park, Y.K, "Analysis on Smart City Service Technology with IoT", Korean Institute of Information Technology Magazine, 13(2), pp.31~37 (2015)
  65. Partridge, H.L, "Developing a human perspective to the digital divide in the ‘smart city’", Australian Library and Information Association Biennial Conference (2004)
  66. Picon, A, "Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence" (2015), John Wiley & Sons
  67. Popescu, G.H, "The economic value of smart city technology", Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 10(4), pp.76~82 (2015)
  68. 류인철, "광양만권 친환경농산물 물류센터 입지선정 연구", 한국항만경제학회지, 27(2), pp.1~26 (2011), 한국항만경제학회
  69. 유상엽, "지속가능한 스마트도시를 위한 거버넌스 모델에 관한 개념적 연구", 도시행정학보, 32(3), pp.81~96 (2019), 한국도시행정학회[DOI]
  70. Saaty, T.L, "The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource allocation" (1980), RWS publications
  71. Saaty, T.L, "The analytic hierarchy process", pp.59~67 (1989), Springer
  72. Saaty, T.L, "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process,", European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.9~26
  73. Siheung City, "Sihung Smart City Plan: 2020-2024" (2019)
  74. Smart City Korea, "Busan Eco-Delta Smart City Master Plan" (2018)
  75. Snow, C.C, "A Smart City Is a Collaborative Community: Lessons from Smart Aarhus", California Management Review, 59(1), pp.92~108 (2016)
  76. Song, G, "Smart city in perspective of innovation 2.0", Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 14(4), pp.1~8 (2012)
  77. 송근원, "AHP의 일관성 향상을 위한 척도 재구성", 사회과학연구, 29(2), pp.271~288 (2013), 사회과학연구소
  78. Vargas, L.G, "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications", European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.2~8 (1990)
  79. Vienna Municipal Administration, "Smart City Wien Framework Strategy 2019-2050" (2019)
  80. Wray, A, "Smart prevention: A new approach to primary and secondary cancer prevention in smart and connected communities", Cities, 79, pp.53~69 (2018)
  81. Yigitcanlar, T, "How are smart city concepts and technologies perceived and utilized? A systematic geo-Twitter analysis of smart cities in Australia", Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1-2), pp.135~154 (2021)
  82. Yovanof, G.S, "An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments", Wireless Personal Communications, 49(3), pp.445~463 (2009)
  83. Zhao, F, "Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review", Cities, 119, pp.103406~ (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

스마트시티의 구현을 위한 추진 과제의 우선순위 연구: 담당 공무원의 인식에 대한 분석김유나, 서우종, 오주연, 주윤창한국지역정보화학회 · 한국지역정보화학회지2021 · 제24권 제1호사업구조적 관점에서 바라본 국내 스마트시티 현황과 개선 이슈김지원, 장은미, 장환영, 편무욱한국도시지리학회 · 한국도시지리학회지2022 · 제25권 제1호시민들의 스마트 시티 인식에 관한 연구김민영, 김준형, 염지선, 이사빈한국자치행정학회 · 한국자치행정학보2023 · 제37권 제1호스마트시티 서비스 위험요인의 우선순위에 관한 연구서우종, 오주연한국지역정보화학회 · 한국지역정보화학회지2022 · 제25권 제2호고령자를 위한 스마트 도시재생 서비스 중요도에 관한 연구김나현, 김용진(사) 한국도시재생학회 · 도시재생2023 · 제9권 제2호지속가능한 스마트 시티 운영을 위한 조직관리 방안에 관한 연구김민영, 김준형, 염지선, 이사빈한국조직학회 · 한국조직학회보2021 · 제17권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)

스마트 팩토리로의 전환에 있어서 기술준비도가 통합기술수용요인에 미치는 영향: 중소 제조 기업을 중심으로이용규pp. 1-17잔여 유효 수명 예측 모형과 최소 수리 블록 교체 모형에 기반한 비용 최적 예방 정비 방법주영석, 신승준pp. 18-30전군 공통 서비스 구현을 위한 국방 IoT 적용방향 연구배영민pp. 31-39자동화 물류시스템 내 차량 혼잡도를 고려한 무인운반차량의 동적 경로 결정 알고리즘홍순도, 강봉권, 강병민pp. 40-48국가 역량을 고려한 효율성 기반 한국형 항공모함 규모 최적화 연구김기태, 정병기, 박성제pp. 49-56
원문 보기