본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신제도주의 관점에서의 한국 상향식 농촌지역개발사업 분석

Analysis of the Bottom-up Rural Development Project viewed from the New Institutionalism in Korea

김정태|유병욱
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society Of Rural Planning)|2015.09|농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)|제21권 제3호|pp. 67-84|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp2015.21.3.067

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Bottom-upRural DevelopmentRegional Development Policy
주제분류농학

초록

Although the bottom-up rural area development project was conceived with great expectations, the general evaluation of the project so far reveals that it does not significantly differ from projects carried out in a top-down manner. This paper examines the nature of the bottom-up rural area development project with a focus on its background, including the roles of authority and project participants. Results revealed that the project was designed to be implemented in line with the state affairs ideology of the leader in a negative position of bureaucratic society. Though the form of implementation for the project seemed bottom-up as seen in the process of the roles and authorities in supporting organizations the top-down method of implementation can be seen in the authorities and roles of the central government. It was also noticed that the private sector, designed to elicit participation of various experts, looked to be managed and controlled by public organizations. The abovementioned signifies that the Korea rural area development project has been implemented not in a bottom-up manner but rather in an ever-strong top-down manner, which means that the central government holds more responsibility for the project's results, evaluation, and discussions. Furthermore, as seen in the background of the project, policies have been implemented in a top-down manner without the confidence of the bureaucratic society. Therefore, in order to implement a proper bottom-up rural area development project, there is a need for the bureaucratic society to have confidence in the rural societies.

Abstract

Although the bottom-up rural area development project was conceived with great expectations, the general evaluation of the project so far reveals that it does not significantly differ from projects carried out in a top-down manner. This paper examines the nature of the bottom-up rural area development project with a focus on its background, including the roles of authority and project participants. Results revealed that the project was designed to be implemented in line with the state affairs ideology of the leader in a negative position of bureaucratic society. Though the form of implementation for the project seemed bottom-up as seen in the process of the roles and authorities in supporting organizations the top-down method of implementation can be seen in the authorities and roles of the central government. It was also noticed that the private sector, designed to elicit participation of various experts, looked to be managed and controlled by public organizations. The abovementioned signifies that the Korea rural area development project has been implemented not in a bottom-up manner but rather in an ever-strong top-down manner, which means that the central government holds more responsibility for the project's results, evaluation, and discussions. Furthermore, as seen in the background of the project, policies have been implemented in a top-down manner without the confidence of the bureaucratic society. Therefore, in order to implement a proper bottom-up rural area development project, there is a need for the bureaucratic society to have confidence in the rural societies.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. 조진상, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 성과 및 문제점 분석-구례 방광권역 주민소득사업을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 15(4), pp.109~124 (2009), 한국농촌계획학회
  2. 채종훈, "전남지역 농촌마을종합개발사업의 경제적 성과 요인 분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 23(3), pp.107~126 (2011), 한국지역개발학회
  3. 조영재, "지방정부의 농촌개발사업 추진체계의 문제점과 개선과제- 충청남도를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(1), pp.35~47 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
  4. 최승원, "공기업 민영화의 법적 기초", 행정법연구, 21(21), pp.189~197 (2008), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
  6. Foucault M, "Ethics-subjectivity and Truth" (1994), The MIT Press
  7. Agency report with the citizens in 2007, "Government Information Agency", Government Information Agency, ~ (2007)
  8. Habermas J, "Postmetaphysical Thinking" (1994), The MIT Press
  9. 하승우, "한국의 지역사회와 새로운 변화전략의 필요성", 경제와 사회, 75(75), pp.76~105 (2007), 비판사회학회
  10. Hong M, "Activation plan for Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project : Policy materials of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Committee of National Assembly" (2004), Secretariat of the National Assembly
  11. 황한철, "미국의 농촌개발사업 고찰과 시사점- 메인 스트리트 프로그램을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 15(4), pp.147~160 (2009), 한국농촌계획학회
  12. 장용석, "한국사회 투명성 패러다임의 전환 1993년～2006년 신문기사 내용분석", 한국사회학, 42(7), pp.146~177 (2008), 한국사회학회
  13. Jeong, H, "The Roles of Local Government and Green Tourism for Rural Development", Journal of Local Government Studies, 14(4), pp.123~141 (2002)
  14. John, Dt, "Where is Rural Policy Headed?", American Academy of Political and Social Science, 529, pp.22~33 (1993)
  15. Joo K, "Progress direction of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project", Rural and Environment, 14(1), pp.3~10 (2004)
  16. 강구철, "공기업민영화의 법적 규율에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.629~657 (2011), 법학연구소
  17. Kang J, "Local Government 15, Achievement and Challenges in Agricultural rural sector : Focusing on the New Rural Construction Movement", Kangwon Square, 91, pp.40~47 (2009)
  18. Kang J, "A study of Reform for Rural Policy and Rural Development in Korea : A Case of new Rural Village Cinstruction Drive", 박사, pp.2004
  20. 김봉태, "어촌종합개발사업의 정량적 효과 분석", 해양정책연구, 26(2), pp.75~104 (2011), 한국해양수산개발원
  21. 김수욱, "농촌주민의 삶의질 변화 양상과 농촌개발 방향설정에 관한 연구", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 34(3), pp.71~90 (2002), 한국농·산업교육학회
  22. 김선명, "신제도주의 이론과 행정에의 적응성", 한독사회과학논총, 17(1), pp.211~240 (2007), 한독사회과학회
  23. 김정태, "농촌지역개발 민간컨설팅회사의 실태와 개선방안", 농촌지도와 개발, 21(2), pp.1~28 (2014), 한국농촌지도학회[DOI]
  24. 김정태, "농촌지역개발 민간컨설팅회사 경영성과 결정요인", 농촌계획, 19(1), pp.221~231 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  25. 김정태, "농어촌 지역개발사업의 어촌지역주민 협력실태 : 어촌계원과 비어촌계원의 참여실태와 만족수준을 중심으로", 한국거버넌스학회보, 19(3), pp.1~22 (2012), 한국거버넌스학회
  26. 김정섭, "농촌개발사업 참여 주체의 역량 강화 방안", 농촌지도와 개발, 17(3), pp.385~418 (2010), 한국농촌지도학회
  27. 김정섭, "농촌개발사업 실행 과정에 관한 사례연구 : 역량강화의 관점에서", 한국지역개발학회지, 21(3), pp.103~122 (2009), 한국지역개발학회
  28. 김정태, "농촌성과 도시성의 인식론적 이해", 농촌계획, 15(3), pp.47~60 (2009), 한국농촌계획학회
  29. 김주원, "인센티브형 상향식 농촌개발전략사업의 문제와 개선방안", 국토계획, 38(4), pp.103~121 (2003), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  30. Kim Y, "Institutional Change of New Historical Institutionalism", Conference Paper of the Korea Association for Policy Studies, pp.225~257 (2004)
  31. Kim Y, "Theory and Practice of Regional Development Policy" (1998), KRIHS
  32. Korea Farmers Newspaper, ‘119 Trillion, "The Analysis of Agriculture Rural Comprehensive Measures’", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2005)
  33. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Rural Village Comprehensive Development Project Debate", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2004)
  34. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Rural Development? For Whom?", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2004)
  35. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Regional Foundation, 1st Regional Leaders Contest", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2004)
  36. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Set Principals and Idealism of Rural Development", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2004)
  37. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Residents, Local Government-led Rural Development", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2004)
  38. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Agricultural Policy Roaddmap, What are the Details?", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2004)
  39. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Participation Agricultural Policy, We Will Open like This", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (2003)
  40. Korea Farmers Newspaper, "Amendment of Agriculture, Forestry and Business conducted Guidelines in 2000", Newspaper Article by Korea Farmers Newspaper, ~ (1999)
  41. Combined report of master plan on the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project, "Korea Rural Community Corporation", Korea Rural Community Corporation, ~ (2010)
  42. Korea Rural Community Corporation, "Announcement guide to register the consulting DATA base", Korea Rural Community Corporation, ~ (2007)
  43. Korea Rural Community Corporation, "Announcement guide to register the Status of Consulting Company for Farming and Fishing Village Development 2013", Korea Rural Community Corporation, ~ (2012)
  44. Korea Rural Community Corporation Iksan Branch, "Requested proposal for 2nd Reinforcement business on the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project of Yongmeori Region", Korea Rural Community Corporation Iksan Branch, ~ (2014)
  45. 이병기, "참여정부 농촌개발정책의 회고", 농촌지도와 개발, 15(1), pp.145~175 (2008), 한국농촌지도학회
  46. Lee B, "A Study on the Changes Features and Counter Measures of Rural Development Policy System in Korea", Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 14(2), pp.437~469 (2007)
  47. Lee D, "Political subjects for effective rural development", Land, 305, pp.102~111 (2007)
  48. Lee S, "Recent Trends of France-EU’s Rural Development", Land, 384, pp.118~131 (2013)
  49. 이순배, "기초생활권 지역경제 활성화사업의 효과분석 -소득발생과 고용창출의 관점에서-", 재정정책논집, 13(1), pp.81~112 (2011), 한국재정정책학회
  50. 이소영, "농촌지역개발사업의 장소 마케팅 전략 특성 분석 및 개선방안", 한국지역개발학회지, 21(3), pp.71~102 (2009), 한국지역개발학회
  51. 이상호, "지방 일간지의 지방자치 인식에 관한 경향성과 역할의 모색 : <매일신문>의 내용분석을 토대로", 한국언론정보학보, 31, pp.225~260 (2005), 한국언론정보학회
  52. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, "Result of strengthening ability for Regional development 2012", inistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, ~ (2013)
  53. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, "Guide of implementations for Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 2013", Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, ~ (2012)
  54. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, "Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project", Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, ~ (2005)
  55. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, "Guide of agricultural and forestry industries 2005 : related regulations and major changing policies explanation", Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, ~ (2004)
  56. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, "Guide of implementations for Agricultural and forestry industries 1997", Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, ~ (1996)
  57. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, "The Status of Consulting Company for Farming and Fishing Village Development 2011", Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, ~ (2011)
  58. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, "The Status of Consulting Company for Farming and Fishing Village Development 2010", Korea Rural Community Corporation, ~ (2010)
  59. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, "A study on the development of evaluation index for effective Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project", Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation, ~ (2009)
  60. 오단이, "자원의존이론과 신제도주의 관점에서 바라본 한국 사회적기업의 형성 및 성장에 관한 사례연구:초기 인증사회적기업을 중심으로", 사회복지정책, 40(3), pp.269~297 (2013), 한국사회복지정책학회
  61. 박덕병, "EU 국가의 농촌개발정책: 스페인 엑스트라마두라, Jerta Valley 사례", 농촌지도와 개발, 15(4), pp.551~576 (2008), 한국농촌지도학회
  62. 박덕병, "EU의 농촌개발정책의 동향과 시사점", 한국지역개발학회지, 21(3), pp.123~162 (2009), 한국지역개발학회
  63. Park J, "A study of Reform for good village selection system of new Rural Village Construction Drive", 석사, pp.2007
  64. Park K, "Integrated Rural Development Policy and LEADER Program", the Journal of Community Development, 11(1), pp.111~136 (2003)
  65. 양원식, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 공동소득사업 성과분석", 농촌계획, 19(1), pp.55~70 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

지방분권 확대에 대응한 지방자치단체의 농촌정책 추진 여건 분석- 일반농산어촌개발사업 추진 시‧군을 중심으로 -성주인, 송미령한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2019 · 제25권 제1호신활력사업 추진체계와 성과 간의 관계에 관한 연구권오상, 노인만한국지역사회학회 · 지역사회연구2013 · 제20권 제4호농촌지역개발정책을 위한 새마을사업의 현대적 함의양원식, 정남수한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2016 · 제22권 제2호농촌개발정책의 패러다임은 변화하고 있는가: 신내생적 발전론 관점의 적용김태연한국사회과학연구회 · 동향과 전망2015 · 제93호농촌마을 발전 격차의 원인에 대한 연구: 신내생적 발전론의 적용김태연한국유기농업학회 · 한국유기농업학회지2020 · 제28권 제1호농촌정책 패러다임의 변화와 농촌지역개발사업-‘농촌마을종합개발사업’을 사례로-이해진한국농촌사회학회 · 농촌사회2009 · 제19권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

충청남도 논습지의 생태계서비스 가치 평가여형범, 정옥식, 사공정희pp. 1-1824절기를 활용한 마을축제 연계 방안송이, 황성기, 리신호, 김숙종pp. 19-31농식품 수출 확대를 위한 크라우드소싱 기반의 정보 시스템 설계배승종, 은상규, 배연정, 김수진, 배원길pp. 33-45농촌 중심지 활성화사업의 주민참여 촉진 방안에 관한 연구 - 나가노현 오부세정을 사례로 -오형은pp. 47-58농촌 여성노인의 근린시설 이용 및 보행환경 인식 연구 - 충남지역을 중심으로 -이형숙, 박은영pp. 59-66
원문 보기