본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신활력사업 추진체계와 성과 간의 관계에 관한 연구

The study on the relationship between implementation system and performance of the Korean Rural New Vitalization Project

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Korean Rural New Vitalization Project(KRNVP) has been successfully carried out from 2005 to 2010. This government project has been the first one to employ bottom-up approach in Korea that the central government concedes local government to propose proper projects of their use. Local leaders and people from most of counties and cities of Korea have participated in deciding which projects were most proper to their areas. They had been educated for innovating their mind, group working skills, and marketing of their local products. The results of the project were very successful in creating jobs, exporting agricultural products, and working together with local government officials. One part of success came from the organization system in local government. Local government officials’ work time period for the project, the cooperation between civilian experts and project officials were important factors of success in this project. The more educating the local people, the more successful the project, which was another important finding of the research.

Abstract

The Korean Rural New Vitalization Project(KRNVP) has been successfully carried out from 2005 to 2010. This government project has been the first one to employ bottom-up approach in Korea that the central government concedes local government to propose proper projects of their use. Local leaders and people from most of counties and cities of Korea have participated in deciding which projects were most proper to their areas. They had been educated for innovating their mind, group working skills, and marketing of their local products. The results of the project were very successful in creating jobs, exporting agricultural products, and working together with local government officials. One part of success came from the organization system in local government. Local government officials’ work time period for the project, the cooperation between civilian experts and project officials were important factors of success in this project. The more educating the local people, the more successful the project, which was another important finding of the research.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 국가균형발전위원회, "신활력사업" (2007), 국가균형발전위원회
  2. 국토연구원, "낙후지역개발 성공모델과 시사점 : 미국 애팔래치아 지역개발 사례를 중 심으로", 국토정책브리프, (129), pp.1~8 (2007)
  3. 권오상, "낙후지역개발기금 설치를 통한 낙후지역 개발방안: EU 구조기금 사례를", 지역사회연구, 15(3), pp.71~89 (2007), 한국지역사회학회
  4. 권오상, "지역혁신협의회의 성과와 지속화방안", 지역사회연구, 16(1), pp.159~175 (2008), 한국지역사회학회
  5. 권오상, "지역역량강화사업 추이와 역량강화사업모델의 개발", 지역사회연구, 16(4), pp.133~156 (2008), 한국지역사회학회
  6. 김선기, "신활력사업의 추진실태분석 및 개선방안" (2006), 한국지방행정연구원
  7. W중심 농촌산업정책의 성과관리방안 연구-신활력사업을 중심으로-, "S", pp.2009, 농림수산식품부
  8. 신활력사업의 성과분석과 발전방향 : 제2기 신활력사업을 중심으로, "농림수산식품부", ~ (2011)
  9. 농촌활력증진사업 2008년 추진실적 종합보고서, "농림수산식품부", ~ (2009)
  10. 박주영 Park, Ju-Young, "<논문>신활력사업 추진의 쟁점과 과제", 농촌경제, 30(1), pp.83~108 (2007), 재단법인 한국농촌경제연구원
  11. 신활력사업의 효율적인 추진방안과 평가·성과측정을 위한 지표개발 연구, "박준식", 국가균형발전위원회, ~ (2006)
  12. 산업기술평가원, "지역혁신협의회 백서" (2007)
  13. 우윤석, "기존 낙후지역정책의 반성과 신활력사업의 추진방향", 도시문제, 39(431), pp.42~51 (2004)
  14. 유호룡, "신활력사업과 지역혁신", 복지행정연구, 23, pp.189~205 (2007), 안양대학교 복지행정연구소
  15. 지역균형발전정책의 회고와 향후 과제, "이기원", 한국농촌경제연구원, ~ (2008)
  16. 이기원, "농촌활력증진사업 성과분석 및 포괄보조사업 평가지표 적합성 연구" (2010), 농림수산식품부
  17. 이성근, "농촌활력증진사업의 실효성 평가 및 발전방안 연구", 한국지역혁신논집, 4(2), pp.129~152 (2009)
  18. 조영재, "지방정부의 농촌개발사업 추진체계의 문제점과 개선과제- 충청남도를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(1), pp.35~47 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
  19. 신활력지역 지원사업 평가·성과측정을 위한 지표개발 및 향토산업 육성을 위한 체계적 지원 방안·평가지표 개발, "한국농촌경제연구원", 농림부, ~ (2007)
  20. 농촌활력증진사업 역량강화부문 성과분석과 표준모델개발, "한림대학교 산학협력단", ~ (2008)
  21. 지역혁신협의회 발전방안연구, 내부보고서, "행정안전부", ~ (2008)
  22. Mapping Progress: key findings from the updates of the mid-term evaluations, European Cohesion Policy 2000-2006, "European Commission", EC, ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)