본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

손상 없이 영구 접착 보철물을 제거할 수 있는 cementation type 임플랜트 지대주 개발에 관한 연구

A STUDY ON THE COMPLETE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM OF THE CEMENTATION TYPE IMPLANT ABUTMENT

이재봉|최진호
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy Of Prosthodontics)|2004.10|대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)|제42권 제5호|pp. 597-607

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류치의학

초록

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the retrievability of the cemented crown from the cementation type implant abutment. Material and method: The cementation type implant abutments (NEOBIOTECH implant abutment regular, 3 degree taper, 10mm length, 4mm diameter, Ti grade III, machined surface, Hwasung, Kyunggi-do) and cemented crowns were divided into 3 groups, depending on their hole angles formed in the crowns for their retrievability. The abutments and crowns were luted with 4 kinds of cements and separation test using metal wedge was executed with Instron 4465 Universal Testing Machine and the maximum impact force of the modified crown ejector was measured. Results and conclusion: 1. All of the cementation type implant abutments and cemented crowns were separated with relatively small force by metal wedge. 2. The retrieving force was minimum when the metal wedge was applied perpendicular to the axis of abutment. 3. The force for retrieving crowns from abutments was maximum in resin cement group, and reduced in orders of zinc phosphate cement, glass ionomer cement and zinc oxide eugenol cement. 4. The maximum force obtained by the crown ejector was higher than the retrieval force in ZOE and GI cement and lower than that in ZPC and resin cement. 5. If it has similar conditions clinically, the cemented crowns luted with 2 types of cements (ZOE, GI cement) can be safely retrieved from the cementation type implant abutments by the modified crown ejector.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. "Otherprosthodontic applications", pp.283~292
  2. "Modified single and short spanrestorations supported by osseointegratedfixtures in the partially edentulous jaws", 55, pp.243~246 (1986)
  3. "The effect of lutingagents on the retention and marginaladaptation of the ceraone implant system", 12, pp.660~665 (1997)
  4. "A 15-yearstudy of osseointegrated implants in thetreatment of the edentulous jaw", 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
  5. "The longitudinalclinical effectiveness of osseointegrateddental implants", pp.53~61
  6. "The longitudinalclinical effectiveness of osseointegrateddental implants"
  7. "Failures and complications in391 consecutively inserted fixed prosthesissupported by Bra ¨nemark implants inedentulous jaws:a study of treatment fromthe time of prosthesis placement and to thefirst annual check up", 6, pp.270~6 (1991)
  8. "Telescopic prosthesisfor implants", 13, pp.352~7 (1998)
  9. "Cement-retained versusscrew-retained implant prosthesis :which is better?", 14(1), pp.137~141 (1999)
  10. "Cement-retained versus screw-retainedimplant restorations:Achieving optimalocclusion and esthetics in implant dentistry", 77(1), pp.28~35 (1997)
  11. "Passivity of fit andmarginal opening in screw-or cement-retainedimplant fixed partial denture designs", 15, pp.239~246 (2000)
  12. "Screw-retained versus cementretainedimplant-supported prosthesis", 7(9), pp.15~8 (1995)
  13. "Principles for cement-retainedfixed implant prosthodontics", pp.651~668
  14. "The role of screws inimplant system", 9, pp.48~63 (1994)
  15. "Insurance", 20 (1997)
  16. "The cost of dental implantsas compared to that of conventionalstrategies", 13, pp.546~553 (1998)
  17. "Alternative method for retentionand removal of cement-retained implantprosthesis", 86, pp.2~ (2001)
  18. "Technique for removing a cementedsuperstructure from an implantabutment", 87, pp.2~ (2002)
  19. "Simplified technique for retrievingcemented implant restoration", 88, pp.3~ (2002)
  20. "Retentiveness of dental cementsused with metallic implant components", 15, pp.793~798 (2001)
  21. "The retrievability of cementationtype implant abutment by surface treatmentsand types of cements", 37, pp.545~551 (1999)
  22. "The effect of the surfaceroughness of prepared dentin on the retentionof castings", 23, pp.187~98 (1970)
  23. "The taper of inlay andcrown preparations", pp.436~8
  24. "Effects of abutment size and lutingcement type on the uniaxial retentionforce of implant-supported crowns", 83, pp.344~8 (2000)
  25. "Retention in the preparation ofteeth for cast restorations", 35, pp.526~ (1976)
  26. "Factorsinfluencing the retention of cemented goldcasting", 11, pp.487~502 (1961)
  27. "Retentionof cemented implant supported restorations", 6(3), pp.193~6 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

임플란트 고정체와 지대주 연결 형태의 차이에 따른 유지 나사 안정성에 대한 연구방몽숙, 양재식, 조규종대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2004 · 제42권 제1호회전 방지용 Post Screw 시스템의 임플랜트 지대나사풀림 방지효과에 관한 연구김종희, 이준석, 임주환, 조인호대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2005 · 제43권 제5호임플란트-지대주-나사의 적합에 관한 연구김낙형, 백대화, 손미경, 정재헌대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2003 · 제41권 제4호내측연결 임플란트 시스템에서 고정체와 지대주 연결부의 적합에 관한 연구이흥태, 정재헌대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2004 · 제42권 제2호수종 임플랜트 지대주나사의 반복하중 후나사풀림에 관한 연구김영수, 김진만, 양재호, 이선형, 이재봉, 한중석대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2003 · 제41권 제4호시멘트 유지형 임플란트 보철물의 유지력에 시멘트의 종류와 열순환이 미치는 영향에 관한 연구전영찬, 정창모, 조재호대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2003 · 제41권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

CAD/CAM system으로 제작한 zirconia core의 적합도성지윤, 임장섭, 정창모, 전영찬pp. 489-500불산 처리 시간이 강화형 전부도재관과 레진 시멘트의 전단 결합강도에 미치는 영향박찬운, 안승근, 최근배, 김경일pp. 501-513수종의 Post와 IPS-Empress Ingot 두께가 전부 도재 수복물 최종색조에 미치는 영향복원미, 최근배, 안승근, 박찬운pp. 514-523한국 미인의 치아안면구도에 대한 기하학적 분석오상천, 신영호pp. 524-534섬유강화 포스트와 금속주조 포스트의 파절강도 및 파절양상의 비교김석규, 김미경pp. 535-543
원문 보기