지대주 각도와 연결방식이 지르코니아 지대주의 파절강도에 미치는 영향
Effects of abutment angulation and type of connection on the fracture strength of zirconia abutments
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적: 내부 연결형과 외부 연결형의 임플란트에서 직선형과 경사형 지르코니아 지대주의 파절강도를 비교하였다. 재료 및 방법: 내부육각 연결형 임플란트 20개와 외부육각 연결형 임플란트 20개에, 기성 직선형 지르코니아 지대주와, 17경사형 지르코니아 지대주를 10개씩 체결하였다. 시편은 연결 방식과 지대주 각도에 따라 4개의 군으로 나누었다: 내부 연결형/ 직선형 지대주, INS군; 내부 연결형/ 경사형 지대주, INA 군; 외부 연결형/ 직선형 지대주, EXS 군; 외부 연결형/ 경사형 지대주, EXA 군. 모든 시편은 만능시험기에서 1 mm/min의 crosshead speed로 30하중을 가했다. 지대주의 파절강도를 측정하고, 2-way ANOVA와 independent t-test로 통계처리 하였다(α= .05). 결과: 각 군의 평균파절강도는 다음과 같다: INS군, 955.91 N; INA군, 933.65 N; EXS군, 1267.20 N; EXA군, 1405.93 N. 외부 연결형이 내부 연결형에 비해 파절강도가 높았다(P < .001). 내부연결형(P = .747)과 외부 연결형(P = .222)에서 지대주 각도에 따른 파절강도는 차이가 없었다. 또한 내부 연결형 지대주는 육각 부위에서 수평 파절이 일어난 반면, 외부 연결형 지대주는 설측 치경부에서 파절되었다. 결론: 외부 연결형 지르코니아 지대주가 내부 연결형 지대주에 비해 파절 강도가 높았고, 직선형과 경사형 지르코니아 지대주의 파절강도는 차이가 없었다.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of straight and angled zirconia abutments for internal hex and external hex implants. Materials and methods: Twenty internal hex implants and 20 external hex implants were prepared. The prefabricated straight zirconia abutments and 17-degree-angled zirconia abutments were connected to those 40 implants. The specimens were classified into 4 groups depending on the connection type and abutment angulation; internal hex implant/straight abutment, group INS; internal hex implant/angled abutment, group INA; external hex implant/straight abutment, group EXS; external hex implant/angled abutment, group EXA. All specimens were loaded at a 30-degree angle with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min using universal testing machine. The fracture loads were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and independent t-test (α= .05). Results: The mean fracture load for INS was 955.91 N, 933.65 N for INA, 1267.20 N for EXS, and 1405.93 N for EXA. External hex implant showed a significantly higher fracture load, as compared to internal hex implant (P < .001). No significant differences in fracture loads were observed between the straight and angled abutment in internal hex implants (P = .747) and external hex implants (P = .222). Internal hexes of abutments were fractured horizontally in internal connection implants, while lingual cervical neck portions were fractured in external connection implants. Conclusion: The zirconia abutments with external hex implants showed significantly higher fracture strength than those with internal hex implants. However there was no difference in fracture strength between the straight and 17-degree-angled zirconia abutment connected to both implant systems.
참고문헌 (28)
- Albosefi A, "An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I", J Prosthodont, 23, pp.296~301 (2014)
- 문승진, "전치부 지르코니아 지대주의 축벽 두께", 대한치과보철학회지, 53(4), pp.345~351 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Yildirim M, "In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.325~331 (2003)
- Sailer I, "In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.850~858 (2009)
- Truninger TC, "Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.12~18 (2012)
- Cavallaro J Jr, "Angled implant abutments: a practical application of available knowledge", J Am Dent Assoc, 142, pp.150~158 (2011)
- Maeda Y, "In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections:a short communication", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.75~78 (2006)
- Segundo RM, "Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis", Stomatologija, 11, pp.55~59 (2009)
- Kitagawa T, "Influence of implant", abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system, 2005, pp.75, 457~463
- Thulasidas S, "Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.127~135 (2015)
- Sethi A, "The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.801~810 (2000)
- Saab XE, "Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study", J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp.85~92 (2007)
- Papavasiliou G, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.633~640 (1996)
- Tsuge T, "Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants", Dent Mater J, 28, pp.373~381 (2009)
- Canullo L, "Mechanical testing of thinwalled zirconia abutments", J Appl Oral Sci, 21, pp.20~24 (2013)
- Kajiwara N, "Soft tissue biological response to zirconia and metal implant abutments compared with natural tooth: microcirculation monitoring as a novel bioindicator", Implant Dent, 24, pp.37~41 (2015)
- Hjerppe J, "Loadbearing capacity of custom-made versus prefabricated commercially available zirconia abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.132~138 (2011)
- Aboushelib MN, "Zirconia implant abutment fracture:clinical case reports and precautions for use", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.616~619 (2009)
- Yilmaz B, "Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.373~377 (2015)
- Adatia ND, "Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.17~22 (2009)
- De Boever JA, "Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry", J Prosthet Dent, 40, pp.326~333 (1978)
- Waltimo A, "A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults", Scand J Dent Res, 101, pp.171~175 (1993)
- Haraldson T, "Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges", Acta Odontol Scand, 37, pp.195~206 (1979)
- Al-Omari WM, "Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.263~273 (2010)
- Dittmer MP, "Influence of the interface design on the yield force of the implantabutment complex before and after cyclic mechanical loading", J Prosthodont Res, 56, pp.19~24 (2012)
- Ribeiro CG, "Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing", J Appl Oral Sci, 19, pp.413~420 (2011)
- Freitas AC Jr, "Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns", Eur J Oral Sci, 119, pp.323~330 (2011)
- Karl M, "Influence of loading frequency on implant failure under cyclic fatigue conditions", Dent Mater, 25, pp.1426~1432 (2009)