전치부 지르코니아 지대주의 축벽 두께
Axial wall thickness of zirconia abutment in anterior region
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적: 이 실험의 목적은 전치부 임플란트에 적용되는 지르코니아 지대주의 적절한 축벽의 두께를 평가하는 것이었다. 재료 및 방법: 시편들은 4가지의 서로 다른 두께로 제작되었으며, 일정하게 제작하고자 CAD/CAM 시스템을 이용하여 소결전 지르코니아 블록을 가공한 후 소결하였다. 가공된 시편들은 두께에 따라 Group 1 (0.5 mm), Group 2 (0.8 mm), Group 3 (1.0 mm), Group 4 (1.2 mm)의 4가지 그룹으로 분류되었다. 임플란트 시스템은 외부연결형(US, Osstem, Pussan, Korea) 을 이용하였다. 지대주 시편들은 시멘트 유지형 지대주를 복제하여 제작되었다. 크라운은 1.5 mm 의 두께로 CAD/CAM을 이용하여 제작되었다. 제작된 지대주 시편들을 임플란트에 고정시킨 후 레진시멘트(RelyX(TM) UniCem, 3M ESPE AG, Seefeld, Germany)를 이용하여 크라운을 합착하였다. 지르코니아 지대주의 파절을 측정하기 위해 만능시험기로 임플란트 장축에 30도의 각도로 힘을 가하였다. 결과: Group 1, Group 2, Group 3와 Group 4의 파절강도는 각각 236.00 ± 67.55 N, 599.00 ± 15.80 N, 588.20 ± 33.18 N, 97.83 ± 98.13 N이었다. Group 1이 다른 그룹에 비해 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 낮은 강도를 보여주었다(independent Mann-Whitney U-test, P<.05). 나머지 Group 2, Group 3와 Group 4는 서로 통계학적으로 유의성을 보여주지 않았다(independent Mann-Whitney U-test, P>.05). 결론: 지르코니아 지대주는 파절에 저항하기 위해 적절한 두께를 필요로 한다. 이 실험의 결과로 판단할 때, 지르코니아 지대주가 전치부 임플란트에 적용되기 위해서는 0.8 mm 이상의 두께를 가져야 된다고 추천된다.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proper axial thickness of zirconia abutment applied to implant in the anterior region. Materials and methods: Zirconia abutments were prepared at different axial wall thickness by processing pre-sintered zirconia blocks via CAD/CAM to obtain equal specimens. The abutments were each produced with a thickness of 0.5 mm (Group 1), 0.8 mm (Group 2), 1.2 mm (Group 3), or 1.5 mm (Group 4). The implant used in this study was a external connection type one (US, Osstem, Pussan, Korea) product and the zirconia abutment was prepared via replication of a cemented abutment. The crowns were prepared via CAM/CAM with a thickness of 1.5 mm and were cemented to the abutments using RelyXTM UniCem cement. A universal testing machine was used to apply load at 30 degrees and measure fracture strength of the zirconia abutment. Results: Fracture strength of the abutments for Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 were 236.00 ± 67.55 N, 599.00 ± 15.80 N, 588.20 ± 33.18 N, and 97.83 ± 98.13 N, respectively. Group 1 showed a significantly lower value, as compared to the other groups (independent Mann-Whitney U-test. P<.05). No significant differences were detected among Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 (independent Mann-Whitney U-test. P>.05). Conclusion: Zirconia abutment requires optimal thickness for fracture resistance. Within the limitation of this study, > 0.8 mm thickness is recommended for zirconia abutment in anterior implants.
참고문헌 (20)
- Abrahamsson I, "The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 25, pp.721~727 (1998)
- Andersson B, "Ceramic implant abutments used for short-span fixed partial dentures: a prospective 2-year multicenter study", Int J Prosthodont, 12, pp.318~324 (1999)
- Welander M, "The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.635~641 (2008)
- Andersson B, "Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs : a prospective 5-year multicenter study", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.640~646 (2003)
- Aramouni P, "Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments", J Contemp Dent Pract, 9, pp.41~48 (2008)
- Att W, "Fracture resistance of singletooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.111~116 (2006)
- Yildirim M, "Ceramic abutments--a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.81~91 (2000)
- Bressan E1, "Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations : a prospective multicenter study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.631~637 (2011)
- Prestipino V, "Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part I", J Esthet Dent, 5, pp.29~36 (1993)
- Rasperini G, "In vivo early plaque formation on pure titanium and ceramic abutments : a comparative microbiological and SEM analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.357~364 (1998)
- Prestipino V, "Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part II", J Esthet Dent, 5, pp.63~68 (1993)
- Glauser R, "Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.285~290 (2004)
- Reich S1, "The effect of finish line preparation and layer thickness on the failure load and fractography of ZrO2 copings", J Prosthet Dent, 99, pp.369~376 (2008)
- Manicone PF, "An overview of zirconia ceramics : basic properties and clinical applications", J Dent, 35, pp.819~826 (2007)
- Adatia ND, "Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.17~22 (2009)
- Yildirim M, "In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.325~331 (2003)
- Butz F, "Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation", J Oral Rehabil, 32, pp.838~843 (2005)
- Gehrke P, "Zirconium implant abutments : fracture strength and influence of cyclic loading on retaining-screw loosening", Quintessence Int, 37, pp.19~26 (2006)
- Yang B1, "Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding", Dent Mater, 24, pp.508~513 (2008)
- Sakaguchi RL, "The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation", Dent Mater, 2, pp.235~240 (1986)