한국어판 DSM-IV 인격장애 구조화된 면담도구 개발：신뢰도 연구
Development of the Korean Version of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality(K-SIDP-IV)：Interrater Reliability
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Objectives: The diagnosis and assessment of personality disorders are crucial for research, as well as for clinical practice. The Structured Interview for the DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV) is a structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (PD). This study aimed to develop the Korean version of the SIDP-IV and to test its inter-rater reliability. Methods: A panel consisting of 7 psychiatrists translated the SIDP-IV into Korean. Six psychiatrists and 1 psychiatric nurse, all trained to apply the SIPD-IV, interviewed 70 inpatients (male, 30；female, 40) using this translation, two joint-examiners per patient interview. We used kappa coefficients to test diagnosis agreement, the Pearson correlation coefficient to test K-SIDP-IV total score agreement, and percent agreement to test the agreement on the number of DSM-IV criteria met. Results: The kappa coefficients for most of the PDs, such as paranoid, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic, avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive, were excellent (≥0.80). Moreover, the kappa coefficients for schizoid and antisocial PD were acceptable (k=0.66). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the K-SIDP-IV total scores were high for all personality disorders (r=0.91-0.97). Percent agreement regarding the number of DSM-IV criteria met varied from 92.9% to 100%. Conclusion: The Korean version of the SIDP-IV is a reliable instrument for the assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders.
Abstract
Objectives: The diagnosis and assessment of personality disorders are crucial for research, as well as for clinical practice. The Structured Interview for the DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV) is a structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (PD). This study aimed to develop the Korean version of the SIDP-IV and to test its inter-rater reliability. Methods: A panel consisting of 7 psychiatrists translated the SIDP-IV into Korean. Six psychiatrists and 1 psychiatric nurse, all trained to apply the SIPD-IV, interviewed 70 inpatients (male, 30；female, 40) using this translation, two joint-examiners per patient interview. We used kappa coefficients to test diagnosis agreement, the Pearson correlation coefficient to test K-SIDP-IV total score agreement, and percent agreement to test the agreement on the number of DSM-IV criteria met. Results: The kappa coefficients for most of the PDs, such as paranoid, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic, avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive, were excellent (≥0.80). Moreover, the kappa coefficients for schizoid and antisocial PD were acceptable (k=0.66). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the K-SIDP-IV total scores were high for all personality disorders (r=0.91-0.97). Percent agreement regarding the number of DSM-IV criteria met varied from 92.9% to 100%. Conclusion: The Korean version of the SIDP-IV is a reliable instrument for the assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders.
참고문헌 (29)
- Goldberg D, "A classification of psychological distress for use in primary care settings", Soc Sci Med, 35, pp.189~193 (1992)
- Mellsop G, "The reliability of axis II of DSM-III", Am J Psychiatry, 139, pp.1360~1361 (1982)
- Regier DA, "Epidemiology in Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry", pp.377~397 (1995), Williams & Wilkins
- Zanarini MC, "The diagnostic Interview for Personality Disorders: interrater and testretest reliability", Compr Psychiatry, 28, pp.467~480 (1987)
- First MB, "User’s guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders" (1997), American Psychiatric Press
- Pfohl B, "Structured interview for DSM-IV personality (SIDP-IV)" (1997), American Psychiatric Press
- Loranger AW, "International Personality Disorder Examination Manual: DSM-IV Module" (1999), World Health Organization
- Loranger AW, "International Personality Disorder Examination Manual: ICD-10 Module" (1995), American Psychiatric Press
- Widiger TA, "Personality Disorder Interview-IV: A semistructured interview for the assessment of personality disorders" (1995), Psychological Assessment Resources
- 김중술, "다면적 인성검사: MMPI의 임상적 해석" (1996), 서울대학교 출판부
- Yang EJ, "Biogenetic temperament, phenotypic, and defense style profile of borderline personality disorder and their relationship to borderline psychopathology", Kor J Psychopath, 9, pp.3~15 (2000)
- 안창규, "NEO 인성검사의 해석과 활용" (1996), 한국가이던스
- Chae YR, "The development of the Korean version of Personality Disorder Questionnaire-Revised: Evaluation of the Test Retest Reliability and Validity", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 34, pp.267~279 (1995)
- Hahn OS, "Development of Korean Version of Structured Clinical Interview Schedule for DSM-IV Axis I Disorder: Interrater Reliability", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 39, pp.362~372 (2000)
- Brent DA, "Reliability and validity of the structured interview for personality disorders in adolescents", J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 29, pp.349~354 (1990)
- Jackson HJ, "Diagnosing personality disorders in psychiatric inpatients", Acta Psychiatr Scand, 83, pp.206~213 (1991)
- Stangl D, "A Structured interview for the DSM-III personality disorders: a preliminary report", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 42, pp.591~596 (1985)
- Zimmerman M, "The reliability of personality disorder diagnoses in a nonpatient sample", J Pers Disord, 3, pp.53~57 (1989)
- AxisII comorbidity findings: implications for validity in AxisII: New Perspectives on Validity, "AxisI", pp.1990, Pfohl B
- Clark LA, "Dimensional approaches to personality disorder assessment and diagnosis in Personality and psychopathology", pp.219~244 (1999), American Psychiatric Press
- Heumann KA, "Reliability of categorical and dimensional judgements of personality disorder", Am J Psychiatry, 147, pp.498~500 (1990)
- Widiger T, "Categorical versus dimensional classification: Implications from and for research", J Pers Disord, 6, pp.287~300 (1992)
- Cloninger CR, "A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: a proposal", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 44, pp.573~588 (1987)
- Spitzer RL, "DSM-III field trials: I. Initial interrater diagnostic reliability", Am J Psychiatry, 136, pp.815~817 (1979)
- Pilkonis PA, "The reliability and validity of two structured diagnostic interviews for personality disorders", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 52, pp.1025~1033 (1995)
- Fountoulakis KN, "Reliability and cultural applicability of the Greek version of the International Personality Disorders Examination", BMC Psychiatry, 2, pp.6~ (2002)
- Del-Ben CM, "Reliability of the Portuguese version of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric outpatients", Braz J Med Biol Res, 29, pp.1675~1682 (1996)
- Chang SM, "Cross-national difference in the prevalence of depression caused by the diagnostic threshold", J Affect Disord, 106, pp.159~167 (2008)
- Cho MJ, "Cross-national differences in the lifetime prevalence of mental disorders and screening mental symptoms between Korea and United States. (submitted)", ~