Design Implications for Teachers’ Tools in Differentiated Instruction through Case Studies
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The diversity of students is getting increased in the contemporary classroom. To deal with the diversity, differentiated instruction (DI) should be considered as a way of providing alternative approaches to content, process and product according to the students’ readiness,interest, and learning needs. Teachers have problems and difficulties in supporting different student’s needs. In fact, teachers need proven tools including framework, guidelines or computing systems to help to practice DI in real context. According to the activity theory,tools influence on how people act and think and even their social practice, playing a crucial role in mediating the activities with people. In DI practice, there are also some studies about physical and abstract tools, but they have been not widely utilized by teachers in real schools. It means that more innovative tool to promote DI might be required. Therefore, to design a better tool to mediate the DI activities with teacher, case studies were conducted. In order to elicit the design implications, two physical and two abstract tools for DI practice were analyzed as case studies. Through the analysis of the case studies, eight design implications better to facilitate DI practice were suggested. This study has implications in suggesting design guidelines for teachers’ tools to facilitate their DI practice by analyzing case studies in DI practices for an innovative tool in the educational practice.
Abstract
The diversity of students is getting increased in the contemporary classroom. To deal with the diversity, differentiated instruction (DI) should be considered as a way of providing alternative approaches to content, process and product according to the students’ readiness,interest, and learning needs. Teachers have problems and difficulties in supporting different student’s needs. In fact, teachers need proven tools including framework, guidelines or computing systems to help to practice DI in real context. According to the activity theory,tools influence on how people act and think and even their social practice, playing a crucial role in mediating the activities with people. In DI practice, there are also some studies about physical and abstract tools, but they have been not widely utilized by teachers in real schools. It means that more innovative tool to promote DI might be required. Therefore, to design a better tool to mediate the DI activities with teacher, case studies were conducted. In order to elicit the design implications, two physical and two abstract tools for DI practice were analyzed as case studies. Through the analysis of the case studies, eight design implications better to facilitate DI practice were suggested. This study has implications in suggesting design guidelines for teachers’ tools to facilitate their DI practice by analyzing case studies in DI practices for an innovative tool in the educational practice.
참고문헌 (33)
- Ahn, M. L., "Implimentation of UDL and TPACK for inclusive education: Multicultural education for preservice teachers", International Conference for Korean Society for Multicultural Education (2010)
- Akhras, F. N., "System intelligence in constructivist learning", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, pp.344~376 (2000)
- Bertelsen, O. W., "Activity theory, In HCI models theories, and frameworks: toward a multidisciplinary science", pp.291~324 (2003), Morgan Kaufmann Publisher
- "UDL Toolkits: Planning for All Learners (PAL)"[URL]
- CAST, "Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0" (2011), CAST
- 차현진, "보편적 학습 설계(UDL) 기반 차별화 교수 지원 도구인 PAL 툴의 스마트폰 응용프로그램 설계", 교육정보미디어연구, 17(1), pp.91~108 (2011), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- Driscoll, M. P., "Psychology of learning for instruction" (2005), Pearson Education, Inc
- "Learning by Expanding: An Activity – Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research" (1999)[URL]
- Engeström, Y., "Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization", Journal of Education & Work, 14(1), pp.133~156 (2001)
- Froschl, C., "User Modeling and User Profiling in Adaptive E-learning Systems", 석사, pp.2005
- George, P., "A Rationale for Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom", Theory into Practice, 44(3), pp.185~193 (2005)
- Gibson, V., "Differentiated Instruction: Grouping for Success" (2008), McGraw-Hill Higher Education
- Gibson, V., "Differentiating instruction: Guidelines for implementation: Training manual" (2009), Gibson Hasbrouck & Associates
- Gordon, A. M. F., "Preparing Teachers to Use an Instructional Management System to Differentiate Instruction", 박사, pp.2007
- Gregory, G. H., "Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Doesn’t Fit All" (2007), Corwin Press, Inc
- Gregory, G. H., "Differentiated Instructional Strategies in Practice: Training, Implementation, and Supervision" (2003), Sage Publications
- Lee, Y. H., "Guideline for the design and management of IEP Lesson plan", Korea National Institute for Special Education, ~ (1999)
- Implementation and Diffusion of Blended Learning in K-12, "Lee, K. S.", KERIS, ~, pp.KERIS report CR2007-10 (2007)
- Leont’ev, A. N., "Activity, Consciousness, and Personality" (2000), Prentice-Hall
- Nardi, B. A., "Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human- Computer Interaction" (2001), Messachusetts Institute of Technology
- Park, O., "Adaptive Instructional Systems, In the handbook of research for educational communications and technology", pp.651~684 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Preece, J., "Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction" (2002), John Wiley & Sons
- Preece, J., "Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction" (2007), John Wiley & Sons
- Shute, V. J., "Adaptive educational systems, In Adaptive technologies for training and education" (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Smith, G. E., "Differentiating Instruction with Technology in K-5 Classrooms" (2007), ISTE
- Subban, P., "Differentiated instruction: A research basis", International Education Journal, 7(7), pp.935~947 (2006)
- Tomlinson, C. A., "The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners" (1999), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
- Tomlinson, C. A., "Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades", ERIC, ~ (2000)
- Tomlinson, C. A., "How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms" (2001), ASCD
- Tomlinson, C. A., "Deciding to teach them all", Educational Leadership, 61(2), pp.6~11 (2003)
- "Technology in learning. A response to some questions from the department of business innovation and skills" (2010)[URL]
- "An Examination of Individualized Instruction. Education Resources Information Center" (1985)[URL]