본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

스마트 지원 수업 설계에서 초등 예비교사들이 보이는 스마트 도구에 대한 인식과 활용의 차이

Differences between Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions and Designs on Smart Tools in Developing Smart-based Lesson Materials

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to explore how pre-service elementary teachers perceive and use smart learning environments. For this purpose, 23 pre-service elementary teachers who took theory and practice in a science education course were asked to develop lesson materials using smart tools and make a self-report questionnaire. These data were categorized in an instructional, exploratory, and interactive approach, depending on how they guided students to access knowledge and information. As a result of the study, pre-service teachers perceived the smart tools as the exploratory and interactive learning tools to be used for students to actively search for and interact with data and knowledge. But in developing lesson materials, they usually used the smart tools for resource sharing and communication in the instructional manner. In conclusion, the gap between their perception of smart tools and lesson materials, and the educational implications will be discussed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore how pre-service elementary teachers perceive and use smart learning environments. For this purpose, 23 pre-service elementary teachers who took theory and practice in a science education course were asked to develop lesson materials using smart tools and make a self-report questionnaire. These data were categorized in an instructional, exploratory, and interactive approach, depending on how they guided students to access knowledge and information. As a result of the study, pre-service teachers perceived the smart tools as the exploratory and interactive learning tools to be used for students to actively search for and interact with data and knowledge. But in developing lesson materials, they usually used the smart tools for resource sharing and communication in the instructional manner. In conclusion, the gap between their perception of smart tools and lesson materials, and the educational implications will be discussed.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Arias, A. M., "Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices", International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), pp.1504~1526 (2016)
  2. Brown, M. W., "Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction", pp.17~36 (2009), Routledge
  3. Chu, H. C., "A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for national science courses", Computers & Educations, 55(4), pp.1816~1627 (2010)
  4. Hogan, K., "Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions", Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), pp.379~432 (1999)
  5. 장은진, "과학적 모형의 사회적 구성에서 스마트기기의 역할 모색", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(5), pp.813~824 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  6. 강은희, "심장 혈액 흐름의 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 소집단 상호작용과 소집단 규범", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.372~387 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  7. 강은희, "‘애완동물 안내문 만들기’ 수업에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 역할 인식과 인식적 권위", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(4), pp.587~597 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  8. 강은희, "소집단 활동과 전체 논의 과정에서 나타나는 중학생들의 배설에 관한 사전 모형 탐색", 생물교육, 45(4), pp.491~502 (2017), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  9. Keehner, M., "Spatial reasoning with external visualizations : What matters is what you see, not whether you interact", Cognitive Science, 32, pp.1099~1132 (2008)
  10. Klopfer, E., "Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world", Paper presented at International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (2002)
  11. Maloney, J. F., "Mapping children’s discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation", International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), pp.1817~1841 (2006)
  12. Ministry of Child and Youth Services(MCYS), "Stepping stones: A resource on youth development" (2012), Queen’s Printer for Ontario
  13. 남혜인, "과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 토론 수업에서 스마트 기기의 활용 방식과 수업의 특징", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(5), pp.787~797 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  14. Oliveira, A. W., "Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), pp.634~658 (2008)
  15. 박수경, "스마트러닝 기반 과학수업에 대한 중학생들의 인식과 학습만족도 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 34(7), pp.727~737 (2013), 한국지구과학회
  16. Remillard, J. T., "Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula", Review of Educational Research, 75(2), pp.211~246 (2005)
  17. Richmond, G., "Making meaning in classrooms : Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), pp.839~858 (1996)
  18. Schön, D. A., "The reflective practitioner" (1983), Basic Books
  19. Song, Y., "Affordances and constraint of BYOD(Bring Your Own Device)for learning and teaching in higher education : Teachers’ perspectives", Internet and Higher Education, 32, pp.39~46 (2017)
  20. Wu, W-H., "Review of trends from mobile learning studies : A meta-analysis", Computers &Education, 59(2), pp.817~827 (2012)
  21. 양찬호, "스마트기기를 활용한 과학 교사의 교수 실행과 과학교육에서 스마트교육 적용 방안에 대한 의견 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(5), pp.829~840 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  22. Yun, S., "Understanding the establishment of small group norms in productive scientific argumentation", Doctoral, pp.2016
  23. Zydney, J. M., "Mobile apps for science learning : Review of research", Computers & Education, 94, pp.1~17 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)