불심검문에서의 ‘신원확인’에 관한 법적 고찰
A study on the legal issues of ‘stop and Identify’statute in police stop and question
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Police stop and question is the important authority for police officers to prevent crimes and arrest suspects. Police duties performance Act in korea states that a police officer can stop and question someone if the officer have probable cause to believe that a person has committed the crime or is intending to commit crime under surrounding circumstances. In recently, some people are likely to refuse to police officer’s request to stop and question. So, Police National Agency and some scholars have suggested that “stop and identify statutes” should be amended in Police duties performance Act in korea. “Stop and identify statutes” is law that authorize for police officers to request and obtain the identification of someone whom they reasonably suspect has committed a crime. However, it has been criticized to pose a potential danger to invade the individual rights such as privacy and the right to remain silent guaranteed Korean Constitutional Law. This study examined foreign countries’laws related to“stop and identify. Most major countries have enacted “stop and identify” statutes. For example, some states of United States have "Stop and identify" laws that allow police to detain persons and request such persons to identify themselves, and arrest them if they refuse to identify themselves. Especially, Germany, France and Twain have the law permitting for police officers to request one’s identification card in case of emergency situations regardless of committing crime. In conclusion, Korean Police should try to recover people’s trust by obeying the due process of stop and question. Also, it is necessary to introduce new systems to prevent people’s individual rights.
Abstract
Police stop and question is the important authority for police officers to prevent crimes and arrest suspects. Police duties performance Act in korea states that a police officer can stop and question someone if the officer have probable cause to believe that a person has committed the crime or is intending to commit crime under surrounding circumstances. In recently, some people are likely to refuse to police officer’s request to stop and question. So, Police National Agency and some scholars have suggested that “stop and identify statutes” should be amended in Police duties performance Act in korea. “Stop and identify statutes” is law that authorize for police officers to request and obtain the identification of someone whom they reasonably suspect has committed a crime. However, it has been criticized to pose a potential danger to invade the individual rights such as privacy and the right to remain silent guaranteed Korean Constitutional Law. This study examined foreign countries’laws related to“stop and identify. Most major countries have enacted “stop and identify” statutes. For example, some states of United States have "Stop and identify" laws that allow police to detain persons and request such persons to identify themselves, and arrest them if they refuse to identify themselves. Especially, Germany, France and Twain have the law permitting for police officers to request one’s identification card in case of emergency situations regardless of committing crime. In conclusion, Korean Police should try to recover people’s trust by obeying the due process of stop and question. Also, it is necessary to introduce new systems to prevent people’s individual rights.
참고문헌 (21)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 법문사
- 구형근, "경찰관직무집행법의 개정방안에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 19(3), pp.161~185 (2012), 법학연구원
- 김성수, "대만의 경찰관직무집행법에 대한 연구", 치안정책연구 (2006), 치안정책연구소
- 김택수, "불심검문의 실효성 확보와 인권보호의 조화방안", 경찰법연구, 6(2), pp.160~190 (2008), 한국경찰법학회
- 김형준, "不審檢問의 許容範圍", 중앙법학, 6(4), pp.139~155 (2004), 중앙법학회
- 김형훈, "경찰관직무집행법" (2014), 경찰대학
- 김호기, "신원확인제도와 행위책임의 원칙", 경찰법연구, 6(2), pp.218~238 (2008), 한국경찰법학회
- 박병욱, "위험방지영역의 불심검문과 실효성 확보방안", 형사정책연구, 24(4), pp.79~110 (2013), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박창호, "프랑스경찰의 불심검문", 경찰학연구, (4) (2003), 경찰대학
- 배종대, "신형사소송법" (2013), 홍문사
- 서태경, "刑事訴訟法上 身體內部에 대한 强制搜査의 節次와 限界", 한양법학, (24), pp.385~413 (2008), 한양법학회
- 성홍재, "불심검문시 불심자의 답변의무에 대한 법적 검토", 경찰법연구, 6(2), pp.191~217 (2008), 한국경찰법학회
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2014), 법문사
- 이성용, "불심검문 개정논의에 관한 소고", 경찰학연구, 10(3), pp.3~30 (2010), 경찰대학
- 이운주, "한국 경찰작용법의 형성과정과 그 의미에 관한 연구 -경찰관직무집행법을 중심으로-", 경찰학연구, (3), pp.3~29 (2002), 경찰대학
- 이호중, "경찰관직무집행법상 불심검문제도의 개정논의에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사법연구, 21(3), pp.105~134 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 조길형, "영국경찰의 신원확인권한에 대한 이해", 법학논총, 26, pp.183~208 (2011), 법학연구소
- 하태훈, "불심검문 강화, “인권후진국으로의 퇴행”", 고시계 (2010)
- David Keenan, "AN OFFENSE-SEVERITY MODEL FOR STOP-AND-FRISKS", Yale Law Journal (2014)
- Paul Ozin, "PACE A Practical Guide to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Rolando v. Carmen, "Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice" (2010), Wadsworth Cengage Learning
