본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

경제침체기의 일본형 복지체제 변화에 관한 연구: 자본주의 다양성 관점의 적용

A study on the Changing Welfare Regime in Japan during the Economic Recession: Applying the Perspective of Varieties of Capitalism

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

1990년대부터 최근까지 일본 복지국가의 변화는 고령화에 대한 대응의 결과라고 설명된다. 이러한 일반적 설명에 더하여 이 논문에서는 ‘자본주의 다양성’ 관점에 기초하여 1990년대 초반 이후 장기적 경기침체가 가져온 일본 생산레짐의 변화가 국가복지 확대를 수반한 복지체제 변화에 영향을 미쳤음을 주장한다. 1990년대 초반까지 일본은 평생고용이 보장되는 안정된 노사관계, 주거래은행과 기업 간 금융거래를 통해 장기자본(patient capital)을 제공하는 금융제도, 이해당사자 중심의 기업 거버넌스 제도, 그룹(keiretsu)내 기업 간 협력관계 등이 결합되어 독특한 경제체제를 유지해 왔다. 버블 붕괴 이후 지난 20여 년 동안 일본 기업의 소유구조에서 안정주주 역할을 하는 금융기관과 비금융기관의 주식 소유비율이 감소하였고, 외국인 투자자와 개인투자자의 주식소유 비율이 증가하였다. 또한, 기업들은 노동비용 절감과 고용 유연화를 위해 비정규직 고용을 늘리고 있으며, 성과주의 인사관리를 도입함에 따라 기업별 집단적 노사관계가 약화되고 있다. 이에 따라 버블붕괴 이전 시기에 일본 기업들에게 비교제도우위를 제공해 왔던 생산레짐과 복지체제의 제도적 보완성 - 종신고용에 바탕을 둔 완전고용과 관대한 기업복지가 저발달된 국가복지와 보완관계를 형성 - 이 균열을 보이고 있다. 생산레짐의 변화에 맞추어 기업들은 자발적 기업복지를 위한 지출을 줄이고 있으며, 정규직 내부자 보호를 강화하는 반면에 비정규직 외부자에 대해서는 임금, 기업복지, 사회보장에서 차별적 대우를 취한다. 사회보험료 부담이 증가하면서 기업들은 노동비용 상승을 우려하여 사회보장 재원에서 기업이 부담하는 비중을 줄이고 국가의 부담을 늘리는 것을 선호한다. 1990년대 초반 이후에 일본 복지체제에서 나타나는 자발적 기업복지의 약화와 국가복지 확대 등은 생산레짐의 변화에 따른 사회복지에 대한 기업의 변화된 선호를 반영한 것이라고 하겠다.

Abstract

It is generally said that changes in the Japanese welfare state since the early 1990s have been made by the government's responses to an aging society, in particular the increase of public pensions and health care for the elderly. In addition to this explanation, the following article argues that the change of production regime brought about by the lasting economic recession since the early 1990s has had an effect on the welfare regime, contributing to the expansion of state welfare. Japan had drawn great praise due to the unique characteristics of its production regime, which has maintained an institutional setting composed of the following: stable industrial relations with the lifelong employment system, a financial system providing patient capital based on the relationship between the main bank and enterprises, the stakeholder's enterprise governance system, the cooperative relationship among enterprises in keiretse(large conglomerates). After the collapse of its bubble economy, however, Japan has experienced a gradual change of the production regime from a stakeholder market economy to a shareholder market economy. The ratio of financial institutions(mainly banks) and non financial institutions(mainly employees) in the ownership of shares has decreased, while the ratio of foreign investors and individual shareholders has increased. Enterprises have increased the employment of irregular workers in order to reduce labor costs and raise labour flexibility. The stable collective industrial relations have been weakened by the introduction of new personal management skills, in particular the transition from seniority based wage system to performance based wage system. The institutional changes in the Japanese production regime have led to a break of institutional complementarities between the production regime and the welfare regime that had provided comparative institutional advantages prior to the collapse of the bubble economy. Full employment based on lifelong employment as well as generous enterprise welfare, which complemented a relatively low level of state welfare, has become increasingly difficult to maintain. Japanese enterprises have significantly decreased the expenditure of voluntary enterprise welfare. They have tended to consolidate the protection of insiders-that is, regular workers- but outsiders, irregular workers, have been discriminated against in wage, enterprise welfare, and social security. Growing concerns about social security contributions paid by enterprises have made Japanese enterprises prefer to ease their social security burden and instead increase the state's burden. Thus, the expansion of state welfare accompanied by the reforms of the social security system since the early 1990s have been influenced by the changed preferences and interests of enterprises regarding social welfare. They have reformed the selective affinity between production regime and welfare regime and as a result, the welfare mix has shifted towards the reduction of voluntary enterprise welfare and the expansion of state welfare.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 김용열, "한국에서의 일본적 경영의 효용과 한계", 일본연구논총, 23(23), pp.233~260 (2006), 현대일본학회
  2. 김용열, "일본기업의 소유구조와 고이즈미 정권의 친기업정책", 일본연구논총, (28), pp.257~284 (2008), 현대일본학회
  3. 박경열, "일본기업의 성과주의 인사관리와 노사관계의 변화", 일본연구논총, (30), pp.163~186 (2009), 현대일본학회
  4. 박성빈, "일본적 고용시스템의 역사적 형성과정과 특징", 일본연구논총, (30), pp.135~161 (2009), 현대일본학회
  5. 일본형 복지사회의 위기와 도전. 이면우 엮음 일본형 복지사회 개혁, "신동면", 세종연구소, 15~41 (2007)
  6. 일본 생산레짐과 복지체제의 변화. 일본형 복지사회 개혁, "신동면", 세종연구소, 131~171 (2007)
  7. 신동면, "생산레짐과 복지체제의 선택적 친화성에 관한 이론적 검토. 정무권 편. 한국복지국가의 성격논쟁 Ⅱ", pp.113~166 (2010), 인간과 복지
  8. 안재흥, "생산레짐과 복지국가체제 상호연계의 정치: 이론적 논의와 스웨덴 노사관계 사례의 분석", 한국정치학회보, 38(5), pp.391~416 (2004), 한국정치학회
  9. 양재진, "한국의 산업화시기 숙련형성과 복지제도의 기원: 생산레짐 시각에서 본 1962-1986년의 재해석", 한국정치학회보, 38(5), pp.85~103 (2004), 한국정치학회
  10. 일본의 사회보장, "일본국립사회보장인구문제연구소(NIPSSR)", ~ (2007)
  11. "National Accounts of Japan"[URL]
  12. "Basic Survey on Labour Unions"[URL]
  13. "Employment Measures in Post-Financial Crisis Japan"[URL]
  14. 정무권, "복지국가연구의 최근 동향과 쟁점: 자본주의 다양성 이론과 복지국가 재편 논쟁, in 현대정 치학이론의 발전", pp.405~456 (2007)
  15. 정무권, "한국의 발전주의 생산레짐과 복지체제의 형성. 정무권 편. 한국복지국가의 성격논쟁 Ⅱ", pp.113~166 (2010), 인간과 복지
  16. 조영훈, "일본 복지국가의 어제와 오늘" (2006), 한울 아카데미
  17. 진창수, "고령화 사회와 연금개혁의 정치. , in 일본형 복지사회 개혁", pp.105~130 (2007), 세종연구소
  18. 최태욱, "세계화와 일본의 복지체제 변화: ‘이차매개변수’로서의 정치제도, in 일본형 복지사회 개혁" (2007), 세종연구소
  19. 최태욱, "일본복지국가 건설의 정치제도적 한계", 서남포럼 (2010), 한림국제대학원대학교. 정치경영연구소
  20. 確井敏正, "격차사회から성숙사회へ" (2007), 대월서점
  21. 伊藤元重, "격차お고える" (2008), 일본경제신문출판사
  22. Empirical Analysis of Relative Deprivation and Poverty in Japan, "Abe.A", National Institute of Population and Social Security Research., ~, pp.IPSS Discussion paper series (2005)
  23. Amable.B., "The Diversity of Modern Capitalism" (2003), Oxford University Press
  24. Aoki.M., "Information. Corporate Governance and Institutional Diversity" (2001), Oxford University Press
  25. Campbell.J.L., "Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton" (2004), Princeton University Press
  26. Crouch. G, "Political Economy of Modern Capitalism . Mapping Convergence and Diversity" (1997), Sage
  27. Ebbinghaus. B., "When labour and capital collude: the poltical economy of early retirement in Europe. Japan and the USA ln Varieties of Welfare Capitalism" (2001), Routledge
  28. Ebbinghaus. B, "Comparing Welfare Capitalism: Social policy and political economy in Europe. Japan and the USA" (2001), Routledge
  29. Esping-Andersen. G., "Power and Distributional Regmes", Politics and Society, 14 (1985)
  30. Esping-Andersen. G., "Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism" (1990), Princeton University Press
  31. Estevez-Abe. M., "Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state ln Varieties of Capitalism" (2001), Ozford University Press
  32. Hall. P. A, "An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism ln Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage", pp.1~68 (2001), Oxford University Press
  33. Hall. P. A, "Institutional change in varieties of capitalism", Socio-Economic Review, 7, pp.7~34 (2009)
  34. Hancke. B., "Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism ln Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict. Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy", pp.3~38 (2007), Oxford University Press
  35. Hollingsworth. J. R, "Coordination of economic actors and social systems of production ln Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddendness of Institutions.", pp.1~47 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  36. Iversen. T, "Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others", American Political Science Review, 100, pp.165~181 (2006)
  37. Iversen.T., "Capitalism. Democracy. and Welfare" (2005), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  38. Jackson. G., "Stakeholders under Pressure: corporate governance and labour management in Germany and Japan", Corporate Governance, 13(3), pp.419~428 (2005)
  39. JILPT(The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training), "Labour Situation in Japan and Analysis: General Overview 2009", 2010, 2010
  40. Mannow.P., "Business coordination. wage bargaining and the welfare state. Germany and Japan in comparative historical perspective ln Varieties of Welfare Capitalism" (2001), Routledge
  41. Martin. C, "Employers and the welfare state: the political economic organization of firms and social policy in contemporary capitalist democracies", Comparative Political Studies, 34, pp.889~923 (2001)
  42. Nippon Keidanren, "Results of the FY2007 Survey of Company Benefit Costs", The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training, ~ (2010)
  43. Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance and Firm-Specific Human Capital: Wage Analysis of employer-employee matched data. Research Institute of Economy, "Odaki", Trade & Industry, ~, pp.RIETI Discussion Paper Series10-E-014. (2010)
  44. Ogura, "Transition of Diversification of Employment between 1994 and 2003", JILPT Research Report, 68 (2006)
  45. The Impact of social security on income. poverty. and health of the elderly in Japan, "Oshio", National Institute of Population and Social Security Research., ~, pp.IPSS Discussion Paper Series. (2005)
  46. Scharpf F. W., "Economic integration. democracy and the welfare state", Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), pp.18~36 (1997)
  47. Schröder.M., "Integrating Welfare and Production Typologies: How Refinements of the Varieties of Capitalism Approach call for a Combination of Welfare Typologies", Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), pp.19~43 (2008)
  48. Atypical Employment in Japan and Germany. the Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training, "Seifert.H.", ~, pp.JILPT Research Paper (2010)
  49. Shalev.M., "The Politics of elective affinities. in Ebbinhaus. B. and Manow. P. (eds.). Comparing welfare capitalism", pp.287~303 (2001), Routledge
  50. Stock ownership and corporate performance in Japan: Corporate governance by institutional investors . Research Institute of Economy, "Shinada", Trade and Industry, ~, pp.RIETI Discussion paper Series 10-E-005. (2009)
  51. Soskice. D., "Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in Contemporary Capitalism. ln Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism." (1999), Cambridge University Press
  52. Soskice. D, "A asset theory of social policy preference", American Political Science Review, 95, pp.875~893 (2001)
  53. Swank.D., "Global Capital . Political Institutions. and Policy Change in Developed Welfare State" (2002), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  54. Swenson.P., "Capitalist Against Markets: The Making of Labour Markets and Welfare State in the United States and Sweden" (2002), Oxford University Press
  55. Thelen.K., "Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies", British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47, pp.471~498 (2009)
  56. Thelen.K., "Economic Regulation and social solidarity: conceptual and analytic innovations in the study of advanced capitalism", Socio-Economic Review, pp.187~207 (2010)
  57. Vogel.S.K., "Routine Adjustment and Bounded Innovation: The Changing Political Economy of japan. in Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies", pp.145~168 (2005), Oxford: Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)