본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중소제조업체의 기술집약도별 산업기술인력 수급불균형 원인에 대한 연구

A Study on Supply-Demand Imbalance of Industrial Technology Labor-force by Technology Intensity in Korean Small Manufacturing

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구에서는 국내 중소제조업체를 대상으로 기술집약도별 산업기술인력의 수급 불균형 현황을 살펴보고, 그 원인에 대해 분석하고 있다. 중소제조업체들을 해당 산업의 연구개발집약도에 따라 4개의 그룹-고기술, 중-고기술, 중-저기술, 저기술-으로 나누고 각 기술수준별로 기술인력 수급 불균형의 현황과 원인에 차이가 있는지 파악해 본 것이다. 분석결과 첫째, 중소제조업체의 경우 산업기술인력 노동시장이 중-고기술산업군에 크게 집중되어 있으며, 해당 산업군내 규모가 커질수록 부족률은 낮아지고 있다. 둘째, 제조기업 전체를 대상으로 한 분석과는 달리 중소제조업체의 경우 연구개발부서 존재 여부나 산업기술인력 비중 등 수요측면 요인의 중요성이 좀 더 부각되는 경향이 나타나고 있다. 셋째, 제조기업 전체에 비해 중소기업의 경우 기술집약도별 기술인력 수급현황에 있어서의 차이는 심하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로 다음과 같은 정책적 제언을 할 수 있다. 첫째, 중-고기술산업군에서는 규모가 커질수록 부족률이 낮아지는 특징이 나타나고 있으므로, 기업의 성장을 지원하는 정책이 기술인력 수급원활화에도 크게 기여할 수 있을 것이다. 둘째, 장기적으로 고기술산업군이 산업기술인력 노동시장에 있어 핵심적인 역할을 하도록 성장해 가야 하므로 상대적으로 이 분야에서 수요가 많은 석사 등 고학력 인력을 양성하거나 훈련시키는 정책이 고기술산업군에 해당하는 분야를 중심으로 시행되어야 할 것이다. 셋째, 비록 연구개발활동에 참여하는 중소기업의 비중이 아직 적은 수준이라도 산업기술인력 수급불균형에 있어서는 수요측면 요인이 중요한 역할을 하고 있으므로 이들을 정책 목표로 잡고 기술인력 수급난을 우선적으로 해소해주는 지원 정책이 마련되어야 할 필요가 있다.

Abstract

This paper studies the supply and demand of Industrial Technology Labor-force(ITL) and analyzes the determinants of ITL shortage in Korean small manufacturing enterprises. We classified the industry into four categories based on their R&D intensity like OECD; 'high technology industry', 'medium-high technology industry', 'medium-low technology industry' and 'low technology industry'. In spite of OECD's earlier data than ours, our small enterprises' R&D intensity is lower than that of OECD. But the classified industry groups are very similar to the OECD's. For the empirical analysis we used a survey data conducted by Korea Technology Foundation. It includes 5,204 small enterprises engaged in the manufacturing industry and shows each enterprise’s current number of employees, vacancies and employees to be hired. The phenomena of ITL distribution by technology intensity are as fellows; The largest proportion of ITL(46.6%) are employed in medium-high technology industry, followed by the high technology industry(22.7%). It means that majority of ITL are engaged in relatively high technology areas. The medium-high technology industry records the highest proportion(49.2%) from the ITL vacancy as well. On the other hand, the proportions of current employees and vacancies are relatively low in both of medium-low technology industry and low technology industry. Therefore, it could be expected that relatively high technology industry plays an important role in ITL market. In order to look for the working condition and imbalance of ITL in small enterprise, we measure the mobility index and vacancy rate. The mobility index indicates the movement of labor-force whatever the movement - in or out the job - is. In our small enterprises, the mobility index is highest in high technology group. The rate of vacancy is the representative index for measurement of labor-force imbalance. The rate of vacancy by technology intensity in high technology industry is higher than any other industry group. Most of our small enterprises’ ITL are placed in high technology industry, and their mobility is the highest. Therefore, it is presumed that the labor market of ITL is the most active in high technology industry. We employ the Tobit model to identify the key determinants of labor shortage problem because the dependent variable - rate of vacancy is censored in 0(zero) which means always positive, then the OLS estimation will be biased and inconsistent. The dependent variable, rate of vacancy is defined a situation when there is not enough manpower that are needed and calculated by the ratio of vacancy of total employee(current and vacancy). There are three kinds of independent variables expected to impact on supply and demand imbalance of ITL. One is the firm specific factor, another is the inside labor-force demand factor, and the third is the supply factor. It can be expected that supply and demand inequality of labor-force is mainly caused by difference between the labor-force quantity of supply and demand. And the firm specific factor has an impact on the both sides of supply and demand of ITL. First, the firm specific factor includes the size of firm, geographic location and industrial location. Other things being equal, a firm which is bigger, closer to the capital region, and locates inside the industrial complex is better for demanding ITL. Second, the inside labor-force demand factor contains per capita(employee) sales, R&D intensity, the firm satisfaction measurement with ITL, existence of research department, and the ratio of ITL to total employees. It is expected that per capita sales - the proxy variable of productivity is inversely proportional to vacancies of ITL. And if there are enough labor-force and the firms are satisfied with current employee, the demand of ITL will decrease. If the firm has a R&D department, high R&D intensity and high ratio of ITL to total employee, then the demand of ITL will be expected to increase. Third, the supply factor includes the average wage and turnover rate which is calculated by the ratio of retiring or leaving from current employment. They can be an indicator to show the working condition. The lower average wage is and the higher turnover rate is , the more difficult it is to employ labor-force. The key findings are as follows: Firstly, the majority of ITL in small manufacturing enterprises are engaged in medium-high technology industry. And it shows clearly that in the industry, the bigger the enterprise is, the less serious labor-force shortage problem is. So it is suggested to support their growth to solve the labor-force shortage in small enterprises. Secondly, in the long run, the high technology industry should play an important role in ITL market. So the policies to supply a well-educated ITL such as Master's Degree are especially effective in the high technology industry. Thirdly, the ITL shortage problems of small business are mainly due to demand side factors such as existence of R&D department, proportion of ITL to total employment, etc. This result is interesting because at the whole manufacturing industry case which includes large firms, the main cause of ITL shortage problem was found out as the supply side factors. Lastly, the causes of imbalance between supply and demand of ITL in small enterprises are not so different by technology categories as in the whole manufacturing. It means Korean small manufacturing enterprise is not specialized enough to divide based on their R&D intensity yet. Thus, it is necessary to support the policy to bring on the technical specialization, diversity and knowledge spillover of small enterprises. In the long run, it is important to make policies to link education and research with small enterprises' participation. Based on the findings, we discover some political meanings as follows: Most of all, it is important to encourage their growth to reduce ITL shortage problem in medium-small enterprises. Also, the policies to supply the relatively well-educated ITL are especially effective in the high technology industry. Finally, although only a few small enterprises are active in R&D, they have to be the most important targets for the policies to relieve the shortage of ITL. That is the reason why it is the demand side factors which causes shortage problems of ITL in small business. The aim of this paper is to identify the major characteristics and feature of ITL market of Korean small manufacturing enterprises. But it could not include the dynamic change of ITL market and clarify the difference between larger and smaller enterprise because of data shortage. Therefore, the political implication is limited to basic matters. The criterion that we used is the R&D intensity as OECD, but especially the borders in a certain industry are very ambiguous to be divided. Thus, future studies are needed to include above matters and also need further studies about the criterion of industry classification based on their technological level.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 강한규, "패널회귀분석을 이용한 경남지역 중소기업 인력난의 원인과 대응책", 중소기업연구, 27(2), pp.89~108 (2005), 한국중소기업학회
  2. 과학기술정책연구원, "연구개발투자의 경제성장기여도 국제비교 연구결과" (2006), 과학기술부
  3. 김갑수, "한국의 산업기술 통계 2008", 기술정책자료집, (03) (2008), 한국산업기술재단
  4. 산업기술인력 부족인력의 특성과 유형 분석. in: 2005년 기준 산업기술인력 수급동향실태조사보고서, "김승택", 산업자원부․한국산업기술재단, ~ (2006)
  5. 박명수, "연구개발투자가 제조업 과학기술인력 고용에 미치는 영향" (2007), 과학기술정책연구원
  6. 백필규, "중소기업 기술인력 수급원활화를 위한 정책지원방안-혁신형중소기업의 기술인력을 중심으로-", 중소기업연구, 29(4), pp.171~189 (2007), 한국중소기업학회
  7. 산업기술인력 부족과 혁신활동과의관계분석. in: 2005년 기준 산업기술인력 수급동향실태조사보고서, "엄미정", 산업자원부․한국산업기술재단, ~ (2006)
  8. 엄미정, "산업기술인력 부족의 결정요인 분석", 기술혁신연구, 15(2), pp.25~40 (2007), 기술경영경제학회
  9. 이병희, "한국 고용시스템의 변화와 미래전망: 노동시장 20년의 평가와 과제" (2007), 한국노동연구원
  10. 조병선, "중소기업 맞춤형 기술인력 수급 원활화 방안", 중소기업학회 08춘계발표대회 (2008)
  11. 중소기업청, "중소기업이 살아야 한국경제가살아납니다", 중소기업청 연두업무보고, ~ (2008)
  12. 한국산업기술재단, "산업기술인력 수급동향 통계시스템 구축" (2007), 산업자원부
  13. 홍성민, "산업기술인력 노동시장의 특성에 대한 연구 - 이공계 기피 원인파악을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2007
  14. 홍성민, "기술집약도별 산업기술인력 수급구조의 특징과 정책적 시사점", 기술혁신연구, 16(2), pp.201~223 (2008), 기술경영경제학회
  15. 통계청, "산업총조사(광공업) DB", ~
  16. 교육과학기술부, "국가과학기술종합정보서비스(NTIS) DB", ~
  17. Cain, Glen, "Labor Market Analysis for Engineers and Technical Workers", ~ (1973)
  18. Freeman,Richard, "The Market for College Trained Manpower" (1971), Harvard University Press
  19. Greene,W.H, "Econometric Analysis" (1993), Macmillan Pub
  20. Haskel,J., "Technology, Wages and Skills Shortage: Evidence from UK micro data", Oxford Economic Papers, 53, pp.642~658 (2001)
  21. Marchante,A.J., "Determinats of skills shortages and hard-to-fill vacancies in the hospitality sector", Tourism Managment, 27, pp.791~802 (2006)
  22. OECD, "Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2006", ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)