본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

이성애 결혼/가족 규범을 해체/(재)구성하는 동성애 친밀성; 사회적 배제와 ‘독립적’ 삶의 모델 사이에서

Same-sex Intimacies: ‘Non-normative’ Life Experiences that Challenge and (Re)form Heteronormative Marriage/Family Norms in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류여성학

초록

Through analyzing how same-sex intimacies are constructed within different social environments and social constraints, in comparison with compulsory heterosexual intimacy, I found that the normative version of heterosexuality regulates and excludes same-sex intimacies as abnormal practices. So, in order to offer how same-sex intimacies could create different life experiments in comparison with heteronormative versions of life journey and gender scripts, we need a detailed analysis to search for diverse life values outside institutionalized forms of love, the family. The social exclusion and being detached from institutionalized intimacy and norms of proper life are not just negative; there is also the potential to create alternative and equal relationships because there are no determined and preconceived life models which homosexuals can follow. In order to highlight the role of individual agency and collective endeavour to create non-normative meaning of same-sex intimacy, the main body of the research was based on qualitative interviews with 18 individuals, divided between 8 gays and 11 lesbians across diverse social status and cultural and material resources.

Abstract

Through analyzing how same-sex intimacies are constructed within different social environments and social constraints, in comparison with compulsory heterosexual intimacy, I found that the normative version of heterosexuality regulates and excludes same-sex intimacies as abnormal practices. So, in order to offer how same-sex intimacies could create different life experiments in comparison with heteronormative versions of life journey and gender scripts, we need a detailed analysis to search for diverse life values outside institutionalized forms of love, the family. The social exclusion and being detached from institutionalized intimacy and norms of proper life are not just negative; there is also the potential to create alternative and equal relationships because there are no determined and preconceived life models which homosexuals can follow. In order to highlight the role of individual agency and collective endeavour to create non-normative meaning of same-sex intimacy, the main body of the research was based on qualitative interviews with 18 individuals, divided between 8 gays and 11 lesbians across diverse social status and cultural and material resources.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. 김순남, "남녀의 이혼 서사를 통해 본 친밀성과 젠더", 여성학논집, 27(2), pp.155~192 (2010), 한국여성연구원
  2. 김지영, "동거를 통해 본 성별 관계의 지속과 변형 : 20~30대 여성의 경험을 중심으로", 석사, 여성학, pp.2005
  3. 김현미, "국제결혼의 전 지구적 젠더 정치학: 한국 남성과 베트남 여성의 사례를 중심으로", 경제와 사회, (70), pp.10~37 (2006), 비판사회학회
  4. 김혜영, "개인화된 사회의 친밀성과 가족, In 현대사회와 섹슈얼리티", pp.50~71 (2009), 고려대학교 출판부
  5. 게이컬처 홀릭 편집위원회, "게이컬처 홀릭(Gay Culture Holic)- 친절한 게이문화 안내서" (2011), 씨네21 북스
  6. 나영정, "한국의 성소수자 인권 현황-법과 제도의 측면에서", 2012년한국 성 소수자 인권의 현주소 학술포럼 자료집 발표문 (2012)
  7. 다양한 가족형태에 따른 차별 해소와 가족구성권 보장을 위한 연구모임, "대안적 가족제도 마련을 위한 기초자료집: 담론", 제도, pp.2008, ~
  8. 문소정, "한국가족 다양화담론의 다양성에 대한 비판적 고찰", 아시아여성연구, 47(2), pp.73~107 (2008), 아시아여성연구소
  9. 문현아, "사회로 열리는 새로운 가족정책의 가능성을 상상하며", 여, 2007, pp.(16), 38~56
  10. 이박혜경, "가족대안의 모색", 경제와 사회, 50(여름), pp.106~129 (2001)
  11. 양현아, "성적 소수자: 법사회학적 쟁점과 전망, In 성적소수자의 인권", pp.11~42 (2002), 사람생각
  12. 언니네트워크 액션+공감팀, "언니네트워크 비혼자료집", ~ (2010)
  13. 언니네네트워크+가족구성권연구모임, "비정상가족들의 비범한 미래기획", ~ (2012)
  14. 우주현, "Sexual Stories Go To Westminster", 박사, pp.2008
  15. 우주현, "‘사람’의 행복할 권리와 ‘좀비-동성애자’의 해피엔딩 스토리: <인생은 아름다워> 시청자 게시판 분석을 중심으로", 한국여성학, 28(1), pp.71~112 (2012), 한국여성학회
  16. 이우찬, "동성애에 대한 기독교 윤리적 접근", 대학과 복음, 4, pp.150~169 (2000)
  17. 이재경, "한국 가족은 '위기'인가?: '건강가정' 담론에 대한 비판", 한국여성학, 20(1), pp.229~244 (2004), 한국여성학회
  18. 이재경, "사랑과 경제의 관계를 통해 본 이주결혼", 여성학논집, 26(1), pp.183~206 (2009), 한국여성연구원
  19. 전귀연, "동성애 가족에 대한 연구고찰", 가족과문화, 10(2), pp.165~188 (1998)
  20. 조은, "신자유주의 세계화와 가족 정치의 지형: 계급과 젠더의 경합", 한국여성학, 24(2), pp.5~37 (2008), 한국여성학회
  21. 차선자, "새로운 가족문화를 위한 가족정책 - 대안가족 구성을 중심으로 -", 아시아여성연구, 47(2), pp.39~72 (2008), 아시아여성연구소
  22. 한국 성소수자 사회의식 조사보고서, "한국 성소수자 사회의식 조사기획단", 한국 성소수자 사회의식 조사기획단, ~ (2007)
  23. 한채윤, "성적소수자 차별의 본질과 실제 그리고 해소방안, In 성적소수자의 인권", pp.43~68 (2002), 사람생각
  24. 한채윤, "한국 레즈비언 커뮤니티의 역사", 진보평론, 49(가을), pp.100~128 (2011)
  25. Ahmed, S., "The Cultural Politics of Emotion" (2004), Routledge
  26. Berlant, L., "Sex in Public", Critical Inquiry, 24(2), pp.547~566 (1998)
  27. Budgeon, S., "Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond ‘the Family’: Friendship and Sexual", Love Relationships in the Twenty-First Century, In International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, 2002, 8~13
  28. Budgeon, S., "Editor’s Introduction: Beyond the conventional Family", Current Sociology, 52(2), pp.127~134 (2004)
  29. Clarke, D., "Commodity Lesbianism", Camera Obscura, 9(1), pp.181~201 (1991)
  30. Gabb, J., "Researching Intimacy in Families" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  31. Galupo, M. P., "Friendship Patterns of Sexual Minority Individuals in Adulthood", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), pp.139~151 (2007)
  32. Giddens, A., "The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies" (1992), Polity Press
  33. Family and Intimate Relationships: Review of the Sociological Research, "Gillies, V.", Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group, 2~23, pp.Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group Working paper, 2 (2003)
  34. Heaphy, B., "Gay Identities and the Culture of Class", Sexualities, 14(1), pp.42~62 (2011)
  35. Holland, J., "Families, Intimacy and Social Capital", Social policy and Society, 2(4), pp.339~348 (2003)
  36. Hubbard, P., "Sex Zones: Intimacy, Citizenship and Public Space", Sexualities, 4(1), pp.51~71 (2001)
  37. Jackson, S., "Heterosexual Hierarchies: A Commentary on Class and Sexuality", Sexualities, 14(1), pp.12~20 (2011)
  38. Jeppesen, S., "Queer Anarchist Autonomous Zones and Public : Direct Action Vomiting Against Homonormative consumerism", Sexualities, 13(4), pp.463~478 (2010)
  39. Johnson, P., "Love, Heterosexuality and Society" (2005), Routledge
  40. Johnson, P., "Coming home to Love and Class", Sociological Research Online, 10(3), pp.1.1~7.2 (2005)
  41. Love. H., "Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History" (2007), Harvard University Press
  42. Nardi, P. M., "That’s What Friends are for: Friends as Family in the Gay and Lesbian Community, In Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience", pp.108~120 (1992), Routledge
  43. Nixon, C. A., "Working-Class Lesbian Parents’ Emotional Engagement with Their Children’s Education : Intersections of Class and Sexuality", Sexualities, 14(1), pp.79~99 (2011)
  44. McDermott, E., "The World We Have Won : Sexuality, Class and Inquality", Sexualities, 14(1), pp.63~78 (2011)
  45. Morgan, D. H. J., "Risk and Family Practices: Accounting for Change and Fluidity in Family Life, In The new Family?", pp.13~30 (1999), Sage
  46. Plummer, K., "Intimate Citizenship: Personal Decisions and Public Dialogues" (2003), University of Washington Press
  47. Roseneil, S., "Why We Should Care About Friends: An Argument for Queering the Care Imaginary in Social Policy", Social Policy and Society, 3(4), pp.409~419 (2004)
  48. Roseneil, S., "Cultures of Intimacy and Care beyond the Family: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early Twenty-First Century", Current Sociology, 52(2), pp.135~159 (2004)
  49. Stacey, J., "Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America" (1990), Basic Books
  50. Stacey, J., "In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age" (1996), Beacon Press
  51. Treas, J., "Sex and Family: Changes and Challenges, In The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families", pp.397~415 (2007), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  52. Weston, K., "Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship" (1991), Columbia University Press
  53. Weeks, J., "Same Sex Intimacy" (2001), Routledge
  54. Williams, R., "Marxism and Literature" (1977), Oxford University Press
  55. Wilson, A. R., "With Friends Like These: The Liberalization of Queer Family Policy", Critical Social Policy, 27(1), pp.50~76 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)