法令의 改正과 信賴保護原則 ― 信賴保護原則의 積極的 活用에 대한 管見 ―
The Amendment of Act and Subordinate Statute and the Principle of Legitimate Expectations ― A Perspective on the Positive Application of the Principle of Legitimate Expectations ―
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the main function of administration in modern nations has expanded to a beneficial function, people's reliance on administration has also increased. Yet increased trust in administrative action also leads to higher chances of suffering damage. The principle of legitimate expectations (hereinafter "the principle"), which protects an individual's trust in the actions of the administrative organs, is based on these shifts. And if, especially, the object of trust is an act and subordinate statute, whether to apply the principle becomes an issue with respect to retroactive legislation or an amendment of the act and subordinate statute. In this regard, judicial precedent categorizes retroactive laws into genuine retroactive law and quasi-genuine retroactive law, and exceptionally acknowledges application of the principle according to the conflicting public - private interests, giving priority to legislative discretion in the case of quasi-genuine retroactive law. However, this exceptional application is an unavoidable result that regards application and effect of the principle as substantive protection, and should determine the alternative under the current structure of revocation litigation. Nevertheless, as can be seen in this case, there is a need to protect private interests at least partially, especially in connection with the amendment of act and subordinate statute. And it is necessary to apply the principle flexibly and proportionately. In this light, a method should be devised that allows for more flexible protection of trust by strengthening compensatory protection. This paper concludes that Courts should actively cooperate and involve themselves in the application of the Administrative Litigation Act of Article 10.
Abstract
As the main function of administration in modern nations has expanded to a beneficial function, people's reliance on administration has also increased. Yet increased trust in administrative action also leads to higher chances of suffering damage. The principle of legitimate expectations (hereinafter "the principle"), which protects an individual's trust in the actions of the administrative organs, is based on these shifts. And if, especially, the object of trust is an act and subordinate statute, whether to apply the principle becomes an issue with respect to retroactive legislation or an amendment of the act and subordinate statute. In this regard, judicial precedent categorizes retroactive laws into genuine retroactive law and quasi-genuine retroactive law, and exceptionally acknowledges application of the principle according to the conflicting public - private interests, giving priority to legislative discretion in the case of quasi-genuine retroactive law. However, this exceptional application is an unavoidable result that regards application and effect of the principle as substantive protection, and should determine the alternative under the current structure of revocation litigation. Nevertheless, as can be seen in this case, there is a need to protect private interests at least partially, especially in connection with the amendment of act and subordinate statute. And it is necessary to apply the principle flexibly and proportionately. In this light, a method should be devised that allows for more flexible protection of trust by strengthening compensatory protection. This paper concludes that Courts should actively cooperate and involve themselves in the application of the Administrative Litigation Act of Article 10.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ(제17판)" (2011), 박영사
- 길준규, "행정법입문" (2011), 박영사
- 박균성, "행정법론(상)(제10판)" (2011), 박영사
- 김철용, "주석 행정소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 김경란, "구 약사법 시행령 제3조의2의 개정과 헌법상 신뢰보호의 원칙 및 평등의 원칙", 대법원판례해설, (72) (2007), 법원도서관
- 김광수, "토지형질변경허가와 신뢰보호원칙, In 행정판례연구Ⅵ" (2001), 서울대학교 출판부
- 김덕진, "행정청이 신뢰의 대상이 되는 공적인 견해표명을 한 경우에 있어서의 신뢰보호의 원칙 적용에 관한 고찰", 재판실무연구 (2000), 광주지방법원
- 김병기, "법령개정과 신뢰보호원칙, In 행정판례연구ⅩⅣ" (2009), 박영사
- 명재진, "신뢰보호와 헌법", 연세법학연구, 10(1) (2003), 연세법학회
- 박경철, "신뢰보호원칙에 대한 헌법재판소의 태도", 헌법실무연구, 7 (2006), 헌법실무연구회
- 박영만, "법령의 개정과 신뢰보호의 원칙, In 행정판례연구ⅩⅢ" (2008), 박영사
- 박정훈, "행정법의 체계와 방법론" (2005), 박영사
- 안동인, "영국법상 신뢰보호원칙에 관한 연구: 다원적 법비교를 통한 우리나라 판례의 비판적 검토", 석사, pp.2004
- 이동흡, "최근 행정소송판결의 주요동향, In 행정판례연구Ⅸ" (2004), 박영사
- 이부하, "헌법상 신뢰보호원칙에 대한 고찰-신뢰보호원칙의 성립요건과 다른 원칙과의 관계를 중심으로-", 한양법학, 21(32), pp.147~170 (2010), 한양법학회
- 장철조, "조례상 면세규정의 불이익 개정과 납세의무자에 대한 신뢰보호의 한계", 대법원판례해설 (1999), 법원도서관
- 정종섭, "법률의 변경에 있어서 신뢰의 보호, In 헌법연구(제3권)" (2001), 박영사
- 한수웅, "법률개정과 신뢰보호: 부진정소급효에 관한 헌법재판소 판례 평석을 겸하여", 인권과 정의, (250) (1997), 대한변호사협회
- "건강보험급여 약제 등재방식 전환에 대한 규제영향분석서" (2006), 보건복지부
- 건강보험 약제비 적정화 방안, , 보건복지부, ~ (2006)
- Iliopoulos-Strangas, Julia, "Rückwirkung und Sofortwirkung von Gesetzen" (1986), Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
