중재반응(RTI) 연구의 읽기 중재 요소 고찰

키워드

참고문헌 (36)

1. 김동일, "학습장애 학생의 교육적 지원을 위한 진단ㆍ판별 모형 개발", 한국학습장애학회 추계 심포지엄 (2009), 한국학습장애학회
2. 김윤옥, "학습장애 판별을 위한 중재반응모형(RTI)의 이상과 함정", 특수교육학연구, 41(3), pp.141~161 (2006), 한국특수교육학회
3. 김용욱, "수학 영역에 있어 중재반응모델의 중재 요소에 대한 고찰", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 9(1), pp.279~302 (2008), 한국특수교육문제연구소
4. 정동영, "특수교육요구아동 출현율 조사 연구" (2001), 국립특수교육원
5. 이태수, "교육과정중심측정 원리에 기초한 학습장애아동의 중재반응 특성 분석", 특수아동교육연구, 8(4), pp.169~188 (2006), 한국특수아동학회
6. 이태수, "문장제 문제에 대한 일반아동과 저성취아동 및 수학학습장애아동의 중재반응 특성 비교 분석", 정서·행동장애연구, 23(1), pp.187~210 (2007), 한국정서·행동장애아교육학회
7. Al Otaiba, S., "Characteristics of who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention", Remedial And Special Education, 23(5), pp.300~316 (2002)
8. Al Otaiba, S., "Who are the young children for whom best practices reading are ineffective?", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), pp.414~431 (2006)
9. Burns, M. K., "Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention", Journal of School Psychology, 43, pp.393~406 (2005)
10. Calhoon, M. B., "Improving Reading skills in Predominantly Hispanic Title 1 First-Grade Classroom: The Promise of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies", Learning Disabilities Research & practice, 21(4), pp.261~271 (2006)
11. Case, L. P., "The Validity of a response to instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors", School Psychology Review, 32(4), pp.557~582 (2003)
12. Deno, S. L., "Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative", Exceptional Children, 52, pp.219~232 (1985)
13. Denton, C. A., "An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties", Journal of learning disabilities, 39(5), pp.447~466 (2006)
14. Fletcher, J. M., "Intelligent testing and the dual discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities", Learning Disabilities Research & practice, 13, pp.186~203 (1998)
15. Fuchs, D., "Exploring the importance of reading programs for kindergartners with disabilities in mainstream classrooms", Exceptional Children, 68(3), pp.295~311 (2002)
16. Fuchs, L. S., "Assessing intervention responsiveness: conceptual and technical issues", Learning Disabilities Research & practice, 18(3), pp.172~186 (2003)
17. Fuchs, D., "Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria", Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, pp.216~227 (2004)
18. Fuchs, L. S., "A model for Implementing Responsiveness to Intervention", Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, pp.14~20 (2007)
19. Fuchs, D., "Making“secondary intervention”work in a three-tier responsiveness-to- intervention model: finding from the first grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities" (2008)
20. Jenkins, J. R., "Screening for At-Risk readers in a Response to Intervention Framework", School Psychology Review, 36(4), pp.582~600 (2007)
21. Lerner, J., "Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching srategies" (2003), Houghton Mifflin Company
22. Mellard, D. F., "Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to-intervention sites", Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, pp.243~256 (2004)
23. Marchand-Martella, N. E., "Effects of a three-tier strstegic model of intensifying instruction using a research-based core reading program in grades K-3", Journal of Direct Instruction, 6(1), pp.49~72 (2006)
24. Mcmaster, K. L., "Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods", Council fot Exceptional Children, 71(4), pp.445~463 (2005)
25. O’Conner, R. E., "Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), pp.532~538 (2005)
26. Reschly, D. J., "State SLD identification policies and practices", Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, pp.197~213 (2004)
27. Reynolds, C. R., "Critical measurement issues in learning Disabilities", Journal of Special Education, 18, pp.451~476 (1984)
28. Shinn, M. R., "Identifying student at risk monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within RTI; Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention", School Psychology Review, 36, pp.601~617 (2007)
29. Speece, D. L., "Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening first grade children for secondary interventions", Responsiveness to Intervention Symposium (2003)
30. Speece, D. L., "Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification", Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(3), pp.147~156 (2003)
31. Torgesen, J. K., "Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two constructional approaches", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, pp.33~88 (2001)
32. U. S. Department of Education, "Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act" (2000), U. S. Government Printing Office
33. Vaughn, S., "Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading", learning disabilities, 2003, pp.69(4), 391~409
34. Vellutino, F. R., "Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability", Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, pp.601~638 (1996)
35. Vellutino, F. R., "Response to intervention s a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities:", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), pp.157~169 (2006)
36. Wanzek, J., "Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), pp.126~142 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천