패션디자인 CAD의 온라인 교육 방법 연구- 포토샵, 일러스트레이터, 텍스프로 프로그램을 중심으로 -
Online pedagogical strategies of a fashion design CAD course- Focused on Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, and Texpro programs -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to suggest effective online pedagogical strategies for a fashion design CAD course to enhance student learning and satisfaction. The study investigated student experience of online learning and compared online learning with a face-to-face learning experience. Student concentration, participation, perceptions of effectiveness of teaching, utilization of learning materials, and satisfaction were analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale. Advantages and disadvantages of online learning as well as advantages of face-to-face learning were also analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Student concentration, participation, and perception of effectiveness of teaching were greater for face-to-face learning with significantly higher concentration on individual practice. Students utilized video recording of synchronous online lectures more actively than PDF lecture notes. The advantages of face-to-face learning were plentiful communication and feedback and easy questioning process as well as high levels of understanding and concentration. Meanwhile, major disadvantages of online learning were the speed of the lecture, lower levels of understanding and concentration, limited peer interaction, and technical problems. Major advantages of online learning were flexibility and convenience, repetitive learning through videos, and instant communication and feedback. Students preferred a blended learning approach for the fashion design CAD course. For effective online learning, it is suggested that instructors frequently question and check student practice through screen share in a private online meeting room and engage activities that are demanding of student interaction. The video recording of synchronous online lectures is also suggested as a supplemental learning material for repetitive learning.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to suggest effective online pedagogical strategies for a fashion design CAD course to enhance student learning and satisfaction. The study investigated student experience of online learning and compared online learning with a face-to-face learning experience. Student concentration, participation, perceptions of effectiveness of teaching, utilization of learning materials, and satisfaction were analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale. Advantages and disadvantages of online learning as well as advantages of face-to-face learning were also analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Student concentration, participation, and perception of effectiveness of teaching were greater for face-to-face learning with significantly higher concentration on individual practice. Students utilized video recording of synchronous online lectures more actively than PDF lecture notes. The advantages of face-to-face learning were plentiful communication and feedback and easy questioning process as well as high levels of understanding and concentration. Meanwhile, major disadvantages of online learning were the speed of the lecture, lower levels of understanding and concentration, limited peer interaction, and technical problems. Major advantages of online learning were flexibility and convenience, repetitive learning through videos, and instant communication and feedback. Students preferred a blended learning approach for the fashion design CAD course. For effective online learning, it is suggested that instructors frequently question and check student practice through screen share in a private online meeting room and engage activities that are demanding of student interaction. The video recording of synchronous online lectures is also suggested as a supplemental learning material for repetitive learning.
참고문헌 (26)
- 백수희, "디자인교육에서 혼합형 수업(Blended learning) 적용 가능성- 학습자 만족도 조사를 중심으로 -", 디자인학연구, 16(4), pp.43~452 (2003), 한국디자인학회
- Bender, D., "Using online education technologies to support studio instruction", Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), pp.114~122 (2006)
- Diane M. Bender, "Teaching Time: Distance Education Versus Classroom Instruction", American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), pp.103~114 (2004), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Lynn M. Boorady, "Using Animated Graphics as a Teaching Tool in Patternmaking", International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 7(4), pp.11~23 (2011), IGI Global[DOI]
- Broadfoot, O., "Design studios:Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios", Proceeding of Apple University Consortium Academic and Developers Conference, pp.9~21 (2003)
- Ji Young Cho, "Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), pp.473~491 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Coyne, R. D., "Re-visiting the flipped classroom in a design context", Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), pp.1~13 (2017)
- Neal Dreamson, "Online Collaboration in Design Education: an Experiment in Real-Time Manipulation of Prototypes and Communication", International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), pp.188~199 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
- Katja Fleischmann, "From studio practice to online design education: Can we teach design online? | De l’enseignement pratique en studio à l’enseignement en ligne : peut-on enseigner le design en ligne ?", Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 2019, pp.45(1), 1~19[DOI]
- Katja Fleischmann, "Online design education: Searching for a middle ground", Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19(1), pp.36~57 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Fleischmann, K., "The impact of COVID-19 on the international education system", pp.1~16 (2020), Proud Pen
- Katja Fleischmann, "Hands-on versus virtual: Reshaping the design classroom with blended learning", Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(1), pp.87~112 (2020), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- 황지현, "혼합형 학습(Blended Learning) 환경에서의 공간디자인 CAD 수업 사례연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 21(10), pp.115~126 (2021), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 김이영, "실기 중심 의상디자인 교과 원격교육 도입방안 연구 - 패션일러스트레이션 교육을 중심으로 -", 복식, 55(6), pp.150~163 (2005), 한국복식학회
- "K-MOOC users increased by 30% due to COVID-19, the Ministry of Education invests 25 billion and 8 million won in it" (2022)[URL]
- 권유진, "패션디자인 스튜디오 과목의 원격 교육 사례", 복식, 68(5), pp.107~127 (2018), 한국복식학회[DOI]
- 이정민, "Students’ Online Fashion Studio Class Experience and Factors Affecting Their Class Satisfaction", 패션 비즈니스, 24(6), pp.135~147 (2020), 한국패션비즈니스학회[DOI]
- 임현정, "패션 사이버 敎育을 위한 아바타 製作 및 活用- 體型에 따른 디자인要素의 錯視效果를 中心으로 -", 패션 비즈니스, 9(4), pp.1~15 (2005), 한국패션비즈니스학회
- Ji Yong Park, "Design Education Online: Learning Delivery and Evaluation", International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), pp.176~187 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
- Park, S. J., (2021), Kyoyookkwahaksa
- Sule Tasli Pektas, "Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students' experiences within the disciplinary differences framework", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), pp.31~44 (2014), Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education[DOI]
- Schenker, J., "The future after COVID: Futurist expectations for changes, challenges, and opportunities after the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), Mediasup
- 설현진, "네일미용 수업의 플립러닝 적용 사례 연구 - 학습자 인식실태 분석 중심으로 -", 복식문화연구, 30(4), pp.594~607 (2022), 복식문화학회[DOI]
- Shreeve, A., "The way we were? Signature pedagogies under threat", Proceeding of the 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers, pp.112~125 (2011)
- Kit-lun Yick, "Effectiveness of blended learning in the first year of fashion education", International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(2), pp.178~188 (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Zain, M. Z. M., "Distance education : The challenges and effects of the COVID-19 pandemic among fashion students in Malaysia", PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt, 2021, pp.18(6), 110~125