Paul and the Gospel of Luke
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are currently two major streams of thought regarding the question of the relationship of Paul to the Gospel of Luke. One is that there is a clear affinity between the writings of Luke and those of Paul, and the opposite. Such a situation requires that we examine a number of different dimensions of Luke’s Gospel and Paul’s letters in order to examine and perhaps even to establish their relationship. This research examines these topics from a number of different angles. It begins with discussion of the issue of authorship of Luke’s Gospel, as a means of establishing a foundation for their mutual interaction and analysis. Then it discusses a number of the major issues that have been raised above and elsewhere to try to establish the possible relationship between the two. Such issues are raised regarding the authorship, time of writing and theological perspectives. Although Luke and Paul use various Old Testament Scriptures in various ways and with varying frequencies,they have the common interpretive practice of establishing the major theme or idea of a written text by means of an exemplary quotation. In Christology one cannot say that Luke is responding to Paul in this instance, the evidence based upon more nuanced reading of Luke’s Gospel is worth considering. However, when the limited evidence of the eucharistic words are examined in more detail and when Luke’s conglomerate view of salvation and the resurrection are brought into the discussion, Luke is seen to have a more complex view of the salvific significance of Jesus’ death and resurrection. The eucharistic words found in Luke and Paul probably originated with a common source, but it is possible that Paul had a direct influence upon Luke at this point. These issues offer some insights into the possible theological relationship, as demonstrated through their writings, of Luke’s Gospel and Paul. The results allow us to appreciate the individual view of each, recognizing a number of points of theological convergence around major issues in the early Church while maintaining their distinctive voices. In many ways, this is the kind of profile one might expect from missionary companions of the likes of Luke and Paul.
Abstract
There are currently two major streams of thought regarding the question of the relationship of Paul to the Gospel of Luke. One is that there is a clear affinity between the writings of Luke and those of Paul, and the opposite. Such a situation requires that we examine a number of different dimensions of Luke’s Gospel and Paul’s letters in order to examine and perhaps even to establish their relationship. This research examines these topics from a number of different angles. It begins with discussion of the issue of authorship of Luke’s Gospel, as a means of establishing a foundation for their mutual interaction and analysis. Then it discusses a number of the major issues that have been raised above and elsewhere to try to establish the possible relationship between the two. Such issues are raised regarding the authorship, time of writing and theological perspectives. Although Luke and Paul use various Old Testament Scriptures in various ways and with varying frequencies,they have the common interpretive practice of establishing the major theme or idea of a written text by means of an exemplary quotation. In Christology one cannot say that Luke is responding to Paul in this instance, the evidence based upon more nuanced reading of Luke’s Gospel is worth considering. However, when the limited evidence of the eucharistic words are examined in more detail and when Luke’s conglomerate view of salvation and the resurrection are brought into the discussion, Luke is seen to have a more complex view of the salvific significance of Jesus’ death and resurrection. The eucharistic words found in Luke and Paul probably originated with a common source, but it is possible that Paul had a direct influence upon Luke at this point. These issues offer some insights into the possible theological relationship, as demonstrated through their writings, of Luke’s Gospel and Paul. The results allow us to appreciate the individual view of each, recognizing a number of points of theological convergence around major issues in the early Church while maintaining their distinctive voices. In many ways, this is the kind of profile one might expect from missionary companions of the likes of Luke and Paul.
참고문헌 (51)
- Adams, Sean A, "Luke’ Preface and its Relationship to Greek Historiography:A Response to Loveday Alexander", JGRChJ, 3 (2006)
- Aland, Kurt, "Synopsis Quattuor Evangeliorum" (1964), WürttembergischeBibelanstalt
- Anderson, Kevin L, "But God Raised Him from the Dead in The Theology ofJesus’Resurrection in Luke-Acts" (2006), Paternoster
- Barr, James, "Semantics of Biblical Language" (1961), Oxford University Press
- Bock, Darrell L, "Luke" (1994), Baker
- Cadbury, Henry J, "he Tradition in The Beginnings of Christianity Part I" (1922), Macmillan
- Carroll, John T, "Response to the End of History: Eschatology and Situationin Luke-Acts. SBLDS, 92" (1988), Scholars Press
- Comfort, Philip W, "The Text of the Earliest NewTestament Greek Manuscripts" (2001), Tyndale House
- Conzelmann, Hans, "The Theology of St Luke" (1961), Faber and Faber
- Conzelmann, Hans, "Grundriss der Theologie des Neuen Testaments" (1968), Kaiser
- Cullmann, Oscar, "Salvation in History" (1967), SCMPress
- Dahl, Nils A, "Studia Paulina in honorem Joahnnis de Zwaan septuagenarii" (1953), Bohn
- Doble, Peter, "Paradox of Salvation: Luke’ Theology of the CrossCambridge" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Dunn, James D.G, "Christology in the Making: A New Testament Inquiry intothe Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation" (1980), Westminster
- Ellis, E. Earle, "Paul’ Use of the Old Testament" (1957), Baker
- Ellis, E. Earle, "Luke" (1974), Eerdmans
- Evans, Craig A, "Luke 16:1‐18 and the Deuteronomy Hypothesis in Luke andScripture: The Function of Sacred Tradition in Luke-Acts" (1993), Fortress
- Evans, C.F, "Studies in the Gospels" (1955), Blackwell
- Fitzmyer, Joseph A, "The Gospel According to Luke" (1974), Doubleday
- Fitzmyer, Joseph A, "The Use of the Old Testament in Luke–ﾉActs in To Advance theGospel: New Testament Studies" (1998), Eerdmans
- Green, Joel B, "The Problem of a Beginning:Israel’ Scriptures in Luke 1–2", BBR, 4 (1994)
- Guthrie, Donald, "New Testament Introduction" (1970), InterVarsity
- Harnack, Adolf, "Luke the Physician" (1907), Williams & Norgate
- Hays, Richard B, "Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul" (1989), Yale University Press
- Hengel, Martin, "The Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus Christ" (2000), Trinity Press
- Jeremias, Joachim, "Die Abendmahlsworte Jesu" (1960), Vandenhoeck &Ruprecht
- Johnson, Luke Timothy, "The Gospel of Luke" (1991), Liturgical
- Käsemann, E, "New Testament Questions of Today" (1969), SCM Press
- Kümmel, Werner Georg, "Introduction to the New Testament" (1975), Abingdon
- Litwak, Kenneth Duncan, "Echoes of Scripture in Luke-Acts: Telling theHistory of God’ People Intertextually" (2005), Continuum
- Longenecker, Richard N, "Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period" (1975), Paternoster
- Longenecker, Richard N, "Studies in Paul, Exegetical and Theological" (2004), SheffieldPhoenix Press
- Marshall, Howard, "Luke: Historian and Theologian" (1970), Zondervan
- Marshall, Howard, "Ancient Literary Setting, in The Book of Acts in its First CenturySetting 1" (1993), Eerdmans
- Moore, A. L, "The Parousia in the New Testament" (1966), Brill
- Mozley, J.K, "The Doctrine of the Atonement" (1915), Duckworth
- Novenson, Matthew V, "Can the Messiahship of Jesus Be Read off Paul’Grammar? Nils Dahl’ Criteria 50 Years Later", NTS, 56, pp.396~412 (2010)
- Parsons, Mikeal C, "Rethinking the Unity of Luke andActs" (1993), Fortress
- Plevnik, Joseph, "Paul and the Parousia: An Exegetical and TheologicalInvestigation" (1997), Hendrickson
- Plummer, Alfred, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the GospelAccording to S", T&T Clark
- Porter, Stanley E, "The Use of the Old Testament in the New Testament: ABrief Comment on Method and Terminology, in Early ChristianInterpretation of the Scriptures of Israel: Investigations and Proposals", pp.79~96 (1997), Sheffield Academic Press
- Porter, Stanley E, "The Paul of Acts: Essays in Literary Criticism, Rhetoric, andTheology" (1999), Mohr Siebeck
- Porter, Stanley E, "The Intertextuality of the Epistles: Explorations of Theory andPractice" (2006), Sheffield Phoenix Press
- Porter, Stanley E, "Hearing the Old Testament in the New Testament" (2006), Eerdmans
- Rowe, C. Kavin, "Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel ofLuke" (2006), Baker
- Silva, Moisés, "Explorations in Exegetical Method: Galatians as a Test Case" (1996), Baker
- Stanley, Christopher D, "Paul and the Language of Scripture: CitationTechnique in the Pauline Epistles and Contemporary Literature" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Streeter, B. H, "The Four Gospels" (1924), Macmillan
- Tannehill, Robert, "The Mission of Jesus according to Luke in Jesus inNazareth" (1972), de Gruyter
- Vielhauer, Philip, "On the ‘aulinism’in Acts,”in Studies in Luke-Acts" (1980)
- Watson, Francis, "Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith" (2004), Continuum