핀란드와 한국의 보건교과 관련 법률 및 운영체제 비교 연구
A Comparative Study of the Act related to health subject and Curriculum Operating System in Korea and Finland
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was designed to compare and analyze the Act related to health subject and curriculum operating system in Korea and Finland. Based on the research that Finland student had a limited amount of time to interact with parents and there was a potential danger to their mental health and life style behavior, the laws amending the Comprehensive School and Upper Secondary School education Act introduced health (education) as a compulsory subject. The National Core Curriculum for Basic Education was adopted health subject in 2004 and the one for Upper Secondary Schools was adopted it in 2003. They came into forced in 2005. Health learning and literacy are considered as basic rights of children and young people. Health teacher training program have developed. Various health education development studies have been done and the result of the studies have a positive influence on health education improvement. Korean School Health Act was mandated that all students should learn health education, but health subject was not specified in the law. Considering traditional subject and dynamics between subject groups, The Ministry of Education made an official announcement of health (education) as a selective school subject or school discretion time, that is non- compulsory curriculum. It is not the purpose of the law. The Ministry of Education did not place as many teachers as required, and did not take follow-up measures. Health education is making slow progress. Due to education centered on the college entrance exam and conflicts between subject groups, health education just has been taught as a selective subject or school autonomic activity. In curricular operating system, while Finland had an open and flexible system to social needs, Korea had such a closed and rigid system against social needs. This study would make a comparison between two countries the Act related health subject and curricular systems and would suggest ways to change Korean's closed and rigid systems such as changing of legal status, dividing compulsory subject into course based on level/area and securing student's right of choice.
Abstract
This study was designed to compare and analyze the Act related to health subject and curriculum operating system in Korea and Finland. Based on the research that Finland student had a limited amount of time to interact with parents and there was a potential danger to their mental health and life style behavior, the laws amending the Comprehensive School and Upper Secondary School education Act introduced health (education) as a compulsory subject. The National Core Curriculum for Basic Education was adopted health subject in 2004 and the one for Upper Secondary Schools was adopted it in 2003. They came into forced in 2005. Health learning and literacy are considered as basic rights of children and young people. Health teacher training program have developed. Various health education development studies have been done and the result of the studies have a positive influence on health education improvement. Korean School Health Act was mandated that all students should learn health education, but health subject was not specified in the law. Considering traditional subject and dynamics between subject groups, The Ministry of Education made an official announcement of health (education) as a selective school subject or school discretion time, that is non- compulsory curriculum. It is not the purpose of the law. The Ministry of Education did not place as many teachers as required, and did not take follow-up measures. Health education is making slow progress. Due to education centered on the college entrance exam and conflicts between subject groups, health education just has been taught as a selective subject or school autonomic activity. In curricular operating system, while Finland had an open and flexible system to social needs, Korea had such a closed and rigid system against social needs. This study would make a comparison between two countries the Act related health subject and curricular systems and would suggest ways to change Korean's closed and rigid systems such as changing of legal status, dividing compulsory subject into course based on level/area and securing student's right of choice.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강인수, "교육과정 질 개선을 위한 법체계 정비 방안 연구" (2003), 서울:교육인적자원부
- 고전, "한국교원과 교원정책" (2003), 서울: 도서출판 하우
- 교육과학기술부, "초·중·고 교육과정 고시" (2009), 서울: 교육과학기술부
- 국회교육위원회, "보건교과 도입을 위한 학교보건법 일부개정법률안 관련 법안심사소위원회 회의록", 서울: 국회 (2007)
- 김대유, "학생 징계절차 확립과 학생 참여방안", 교육법학연구, 22(2), pp.23~49 (2010), 대한교육법학회
- 김미경, "스웨덴- 핀란드 교육과 보건교육" (2010), 서울: (사)보건교육포럼
- 김상욱, "학교보건교육제도 및 운영상의 문제점", 한국학교보건학회지, 1 (1988), 서울: 한국학교보건학회
- 김영주, "제7차 초등학교 교육과정의 보건교육 관련내용 분석", 한국학교보건학회지, 16(2) (2003), 서울: 한국학교보건학회
- 김지학, "학교보건법 보건과목 고시에 따른 학교보건교육활성화 방안" (2009), 서울: 조경태 국회의원ㆍ(사)보건교육포럼
- 김재춘, "보건교육과정 총론 및 교과교육과정 시안 개발을 위한 정책연구" (2008), 서울: 교육과학기술부
- 전국 보건교사 업무 실태조사 자료, "김희숙", 서울: 전교조보건위원회, ~ (2001)
- 김화중, "초·중·고 보건교과 모형과 이의 운영방안 연구", 서울: 학교보건학회지 (1993)
- 구논회ㆍ건강사회를 위한 보건교육연구회, 보건교육내실화를 위한 모색, "국회의원 구논회", 서울: 구논회 국회의원, ~ (2004)
- 박부권, "특수목적고등학교 제도개선 연구" (2009), 서울: 교육과학기술부
- 안규철, "교육법제 연구" (1999), 서울: 도서출판 대한문화
- 에르끼 아호, "핀란드 교육개혁 보고서" (2010), 서울: 한울림
- 우옥영, "교육과정결정구조연구-보건교과 의제화ㆍ학교보건법 입법과정을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2008
- 우옥영, "학교보건교육 발전 방안" (2009), 서울: 국회의원 정두언ㆍ(사)보건교육포럼
- 이혜영, "한국 근대 학교교육 100년사 연구" (1998), 서울: 한국교육개발원
- 이기우, "보건교과 설치에 대한 토론", 건강하고 안전한 학교를 위한 보건교육 대토론회 (2005), 한나라당 정책위원회ㆍ건강사회를 위한 보건교육연구회
- 이민표, "보건교과 신설에 대해 생각한다", 건강하고 안전한 학교를 위한 보건교육 대토론회 (2005), 한나라당 정책위원회ㆍ건강사회를 위한 보건교육연구회
- 이주호, "서울: 국회의원 이주호ㆍ건강사회를 위한 보건교육 연구회" (2007)
- 후쿠다 세이지, "핀란드 교육의 성공" (2008), 서울: 북스힐
- 청소년 건강행태조사, "질병관리본부", 서울: 질병관리본부, ~ (2009)
- 교육과정평가원, "핀란드의 교육-성공요인과 시사점", 핀란드 교육정책 세미나 (2010), 핀란드 교육정책 세미나
- George Z, "Comparative Method in Education, NewYork Chicago, Sanfrancisco, Toronto,London: Holt" (1966), Rinehart and Winston, INC
- City of Helsinki Health Centre School and Student Health Care, "Health Check Programme", HBSC, ~ (2007)
- Julia Dilley, "Academic achievement and Health: Finding from Recent Research" (2008), Washington Health Foundation
- Lasse Kannas, "Heidi Peltonen and Tuula Aira" (2007), Health education development study
- Lasse Kannas, "Health education as a compulsory and independent subject in the school curriculum: A success story from Finland, Helsinki, Finland:Health Education Research Center for Health Promotion University of Jyväaskyläa" (2004), The Finnish National Board of Education
- Heidi Peltonen Raili Valimaa, Finland: innovative health education curriculum and other investments for promoting mental health and social cohesion among children and young people, "Raili Valimaa", WHO: HBSC artikkeli Via Reggio konferenssi, ~ (2007)
- National Core Curriculum for Upper Secondary Schools, "The National Board of Education", The National Board of Education, ~ (2003)
- Basic Education Act, "The National Board of Education", The National Board of Education, ~ (2003)
- National Core Curriculum for Basic Schools, "The National Board of Education", The National Board of Education, ~ (2003)
- General Upper Secondary Schools Act, "The National Board of Education", The National Board of Education, ~ (2003)