국가교육위원회 관련 법률안의 비교 검토 및 시사점

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find the necessity and implications by comparing and analyzing the reasons for the proposals, provisions, and major tasks of 10 National Education Committee-related bills submitted to the 20th and 21st National Assembly. As a result of the analysis, in general, 10 bills require 3 to 4 chapters, 19 to 24 articles, and 3 to 6 standing members, and the total number of members is 20 to 25. When composing members, it is suggested that the members be formed in various ways with the recommendations of the National Assembly, the President, the Minister of Education (deputy) minister, and educational organizations, but the direction of the National Assembly is to be influenced by majority party. In particular, the 21st ruling party bill favors the establishment of the National Education Committee, which has weaker authority than before, but the opposition bill proposes an advisory committee that professionally adjusts educational promises and remarks under the presidential system. Furthermore, by comparatively examining 10 bills and the passed Act on the Establishment and Operation of the National Education Committee (21.7.20), the nature of the National Education Committee differs only in that it belongs to the president, and the purpose of establishment, qualifications of members, and recommendation of members The newly enacted laws, such as standards of members and major managed duties, were almost in agreement with the suggestive contents that could be obtained based on the 10 bills. Unlike the current educational administration institutions or national research institutes, the item that best reveals the need for the establishment of a national education committee is the establishment of a 10-year national long-term education development plan beyond the 5-year single-term government. However, if elementary and secondary education can be largely transferred to provincial and provincial offices of education and university policies can be resolved by guaranteeing the expansion of university autonomy, other tasks will inevitably overlap with existing educational administration and research institutions. Although it is said to be non-partisan and ultra-government, there is an aspect of suppressing the realization of the new government's education policy following the change of government. Although the establishment of the National Education Committee can ensure that educational policies are stably implemented, there is a possibility of overlapping and conflicting tasks with the Blue House, the Ministry of Education, and the Superintendent's Council at the central level, and the autonomy, professionalism, and stability of the school may be shaken.