주체중심 승부조작 담론의 가능성과 한계 : 니클라스 루만의 사회적 체계이론을 중심으로

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to clarify that the match-fixing manipulation that is being modernized in sports is not a real reality but a reality composed by an observer, and to discuss the possibility and limitation of the subject-centered match-fixing discourse with the theory and methodology of Luhmann’s social system theory. This discussion starts with the questions of traditional ontology represented by the representative mainstream theory of academia. First, starting with the premise of the question, ‘What is a match-fixing manipulation?’, second, based on the identification of the cause of ‘Who causes match-fixing manipulation?’ and ontological perception and thinking about the proposition, third, the ontological solution methods, which say, ‘to whom and what should we do to eradicate the match-fixing manipulation?’ can be said to be a representative example. As such, the discussion of match-fixing manipulation based on the traditional ontology has been suggested as one of the methodologies to solve the problem of match-fixing manipulation, and it has a limit opening the possibility of one of various alternatives to eradicate the match-fixing manipulation and not solving the fundamental problem of the match-fixing manipulation at the same time. The results of subject-centered match-fixing manipulation discourse, which is shown from the results of traditional ontological questions, can be up to members who make up the sports and cause match-fixing manipulation and solve it. As such, the subject-centered match-fixing manipulation discourse based on traditional ontology focuses on the morality and ethics of the sports players in both the cause and solution stakes of match- fixing manipulation.