兩漢時期 月令類 저작의 편찬과 성격
Compilation of Books related to Monthly Ordinances in Han Dynasty and their Characteristic
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to prove that the demands of the times and the interests of the rulers in the books related to Monthly Ordinances existed continuously throughout the Han Dynasty (Former Han and Later Han), and also seeks to discover what kinds of needs of those times were reflected in the content of the books. The general belief is that, when Lushichunqiu(呂氏春秋) 'Shieryueji(十二月紀)' were compiled, the "Monthly Ordinances" had become complete, and from then on the ordinances began to settle. However, the analysis of four kinds of books related to Monthly Ordinances brought the conclusion that the monthly ordinances did not come after the 'Shieryueji', but as the necessity of rules relying on monthly ordinances had consistently come up, the books such as Liji(禮記) 'Yueling(月令)', Lushichunqiu 'Shieryueji' were compiled all about the same time at the end of the Former Han Dynasty. As the ancient Chinese society was based on agriculture, there often appeared timely agricultural guidelines in the books about emperors' rulings. But the guidelines mostly corresponded to general customs. Then when the Five Elements theory was becoming popular, there are records of governing rules controlled by those elements in the books related to Monthly Ordinances. However, until the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the Monthly Ordinances were not regarded as something that had to be followed as the norms of an emperor. But the changes show during the reign of Emperor Xuan(宣帝) of the Former Han Dynasty. Weixiang(魏相), who was one of the ministers at the time, insisted that the emperor had to follow the Four Seasons. As a result, relief measures for the poor during drought seasons and awarding good deeds of officials were all carried out in March according to the guidelines of Monthly Ordinances. Subsequently, by the time of the Emperor Yuan(元帝) and Emperor Cheng(成帝), "Following the Four Seasons" became the role of an emperor. This trend of thinking continued in Later Han and by the time of Emperor Zhang(章帝) and Emperor An(安帝), the virtues of looking after the elderly and helping the poor, quoted in the 'Yueling', were practiced. Meanwhile, when we look at Houhanshu(後漢書) 'Liyizhi(禮儀志)', there is a clearly different point from the previous books related to Monthly Ordinances; We cannot find a farming calendar any more in those books, but only the systems for the emperors and officials in charge are emphasized, concentrating mostly on rites. This resulted from the expansion of autonomy in local governments. By that time, the central government could not control the whole vast area of the country with unified ruling guidelines, and it is believed that the central government hoped to secure power through rites and ceremonies. Then the local governors must have felt strongly the needs of regional Monthly Ordinances, and this was expressed in the Simiyueling(四民月令), a guideline for rulings based on Monthly Ordinances, specially written for regional governors.
Abstract
This study aims to prove that the demands of the times and the interests of the rulers in the books related to Monthly Ordinances existed continuously throughout the Han Dynasty (Former Han and Later Han), and also seeks to discover what kinds of needs of those times were reflected in the content of the books. The general belief is that, when Lushichunqiu(呂氏春秋) 'Shieryueji(十二月紀)' were compiled, the "Monthly Ordinances" had become complete, and from then on the ordinances began to settle. However, the analysis of four kinds of books related to Monthly Ordinances brought the conclusion that the monthly ordinances did not come after the 'Shieryueji', but as the necessity of rules relying on monthly ordinances had consistently come up, the books such as Liji(禮記) 'Yueling(月令)', Lushichunqiu 'Shieryueji' were compiled all about the same time at the end of the Former Han Dynasty. As the ancient Chinese society was based on agriculture, there often appeared timely agricultural guidelines in the books about emperors' rulings. But the guidelines mostly corresponded to general customs. Then when the Five Elements theory was becoming popular, there are records of governing rules controlled by those elements in the books related to Monthly Ordinances. However, until the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the Monthly Ordinances were not regarded as something that had to be followed as the norms of an emperor. But the changes show during the reign of Emperor Xuan(宣帝) of the Former Han Dynasty. Weixiang(魏相), who was one of the ministers at the time, insisted that the emperor had to follow the Four Seasons. As a result, relief measures for the poor during drought seasons and awarding good deeds of officials were all carried out in March according to the guidelines of Monthly Ordinances. Subsequently, by the time of the Emperor Yuan(元帝) and Emperor Cheng(成帝), "Following the Four Seasons" became the role of an emperor. This trend of thinking continued in Later Han and by the time of Emperor Zhang(章帝) and Emperor An(安帝), the virtues of looking after the elderly and helping the poor, quoted in the 'Yueling', were practiced. Meanwhile, when we look at Houhanshu(後漢書) 'Liyizhi(禮儀志)', there is a clearly different point from the previous books related to Monthly Ordinances; We cannot find a farming calendar any more in those books, but only the systems for the emperors and officials in charge are emphasized, concentrating mostly on rites. This resulted from the expansion of autonomy in local governments. By that time, the central government could not control the whole vast area of the country with unified ruling guidelines, and it is believed that the central government hoped to secure power through rites and ceremonies. Then the local governors must have felt strongly the needs of regional Monthly Ordinances, and this was expressed in the Simiyueling(四民月令), a guideline for rulings based on Monthly Ordinances, specially written for regional governors.
참고문헌 (51)
- "時令謂月令也, 四時各有令 後漢書, 明帝紀", pp.101~
- "禮記集解 「月令」", 中華書局, 503~ (1998)
- 膳智之, "中國古代の農事記", 專修史學, 46, pp.5~ (2009)
- 張京華, "月令 ─ 中國古代的 “時政” 思想", 長沙理工大學學報, 22, pp.96~ (2007)
- 津田左右吉, "時令とシナ思想", 津田左右吉全集 18 儒敎の硏究三, pp.578~ (1965), 岩波書店
- 蕭放, "《四民月令》與東漢貴族莊園生活", 文史知識, pp.48~ (2001)
- 町田三郞, "時令說について-管子幼官篇を中心にして", 東北大學敎養部文科紀要, 9, pp.54~ (1962)
- 李成九, "中國古代의 呪術的 思惟와 帝王統治", pp.148~295 (1997), 一潮閣
- 胡平生, "敦煌懸泉置出土≪四時月令詔條≫硏究", 敦煌懸泉月令詔條, pp.38~48 (2001), 中華書局
- 박례경, "禮記의 체제와 禮論 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 刑義田, "月令與西漢政治", 新史學 (1998)
- 藤田勝久, "中國古代國家と郡縣社會", 汲古書院, 499~ (2005)
- 文貞喜, "秦漢 祭禮와 國家支配", 박사, pp.2005
- 島邦男, "五行思想と禮記月令の硏究" (1971), 汲古書院
- 久保田剛, "時令說の基礎的研究", pp.94~ (2000), 溪水社
- 町田三郞, "管子幼官攷", 集刊東洋學, pp.20~ (1959)
- "詩經集傳", 傳統文化硏究會, 321~332 (1999)
- 谷口義介, "豳風七月詩の生活誌", 中國古代社會史硏究, pp.29~ (1988), 朋友書店
- 津田左右吉, "豳風七月の詩について", 津田左右吉全集16 儒敎の硏究, pp.481~ (1965), 岩波書店
- 金谷治, "管子中の時令思想", 集刊東洋學, 50, pp.6~ (1983)
- 王聘珍, "大戴禮記解詁", pp.24~47 (1998), 中華書局
- 黎翔鳳, "管子校注 「四時」", pp.854~ (2006), 中華書局
- "禮記正義 「月令」", 北京大, 546~ (1999)
- 張雙棣, "淮南子校釋 「時則訓」", 北京大, 515~ (1997)
- 陳奇黙, "呂氏春秋校釋 「孟春紀」", 學林, 2~ (1984)
- 于首奎, "春秋繁露校釋", pp.306~ (1994), 山東友誼
- "尙書正義 「舜典」", 北京大, 54~ (1999)
- 馬場理惠子, "主四時と月令-敦煌懸泉置出土四時月令詔條を手掛かりとして-", 日本秦漢史學會會報, 7, pp.130~ (2006)
- 김성한, "회남자 고대 집단지성의 향연", pp.64~ (2007), 살림
- 최덕경, "중국고대 산림보호와 환경생태사 연구", pp.394~ (2009), 신서원
- "國語 「周語中」", 上海古籍, 68~ (1998)
- "孟子注疏 「離婁下」", 北京大, 214~ (1999)
- 장승구, "관자 해제, 관자", pp.6~22 (2007), 소나무
- 김근, "한자는 중국을 어떻게 지배했는가-한대(漢代) 경학(經學)의 해부", pp.198~ (1999), 민음사
- 조셉 니덤, "중국의 과학과 문명:사상적 배경" (1998), 까치
- 四川省博物館靑川縣文化館, "靑川縣出土秦更修田律木牘", 文物, pp.11~ (1982)
- 楊英, "祈望和諧-周秦兩漢王朝祭禮的演進及其規律", pp.613~ (2009), 商務印書館
- 김석우, "자연재해와 유교국가", pp.87~ (2006), 일조각
- 홍승현, "사대부와 중국 고대 사회-사대부의 등장과 정치적 각성에 대한 연구", pp.82~ (2008), 혜안
- 町田三郞, "秦漢思想史の硏究", pp.234~235 (1985), 創文社
- 東晉次, "後漢時代の政治と社會", pp.45~ (1995), 名古屋大
- 保科季子, "前漢後半期における儒家禮制の受容-漢的傳統との對立と皇帝觀の變貌 In 歷史と方法 方法として丸山眞男", pp.229~ (1998), 靑木書店
- 李成九, "王莽의 禪讓革命과 正統性 In 古代中國의 理解3", pp.348~ (1997), 지식산업사
- 于振派, "從懸泉置壁書看《月令》對漢代法律的影響", 湖南大學學報, 16-5, pp.24~ (2002)
- 홍승현, "後漢末 ‘舊君’ 개념의 재등장과 魏晉時期 喪服禮 ―禮學의 효용성을 중심으로―", 동양사학연구, (94), pp.57~103 (2006), 동양사학회
- 「月令」と後漢社會-救恤をめぐって In 中國士大夫階級と地域社會との關係についての總合的硏究, 昭和57年度科學硏究費補助金總合硏究(A)硏究成果報告書, "上田早苗", 46~ (1983)
- 紙屋正和, "後漢時代における郡縣政治の展開", 呴沫集, 11, pp.264~266 (2004)
- 小島毅, "郊祀制度の變遷", 東洋文化硏究所紀要, 108, pp.129~ (1989)
- 渡部武, "四民月令に見える後漢時代の豪族の生活", 中國前近代史硏究, pp.91~ (1980), 早稻田大
- 石聲漢校注, "四民月令校注", 中華書局, 11~ (1965)
- 藤田勝久, "四民月令の性格について", 東方學, pp.67~ (1984)
