본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『석명』 해석에 보이는 음양 오행론적 인식 고찰

A Study on the Perceptions Based on Yin-Yang and Five Elements Theory(陰陽五行論) in Interpretations of 『Shi-Ming(釋名)』

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Han dynasty is a country that succeeded Qin dynasty, which unified the chaotic Warring States period and perished in less than two decades. Along with a sober assessment on the causes of the collapse of Qin dynasty, Han Wudi(漢武帝) tried to highlight Han’s legitimacy and solidify the political order through stronger centralization. Therefore, a large number of intellectuals were recruited to suppress local hojok(豪族, powerful families) forces and seek new governance ideologies through them. At the center of this work was a man named Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒, B.C.179-B.C.106), whose representative book is 『春秋繁露(Chunqiufanlu)』. He studied the "Chunchu Gongyangjeon" and proposed several key ideas, including 陰陽五行(theory of Yinyang-Wuxing), 天人感應(theory of sensation between heaven and man), 災異說(theory of natural calamity) and 性三品論(theory of the three grades of human nature), which presented theoretical grounds for the political cause and the establishment of royal order of Han dynasty. From this perspective, this study looked into LiuXi(劉熙)’s interpretations of characters(字釋), compared with those of 『春秋繁露(Chunqiufanlu)』 by the three distinctive aspects among theories of Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒) in 『Seok-myeong』 : Yinyang-Wuxing(陰陽五行說), qi(氣) and natural calamity(災異), revered Yang despised Yin(陽尊陰卑). After all, LiuXi(劉熙) accepts and stays in such system of reasons of Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒)’s theories of Yinyang-Wuxing(陰陽五行說), qi(氣) and natural calamity(災異) and revered Yang despised Yin(陽尊陰卑). However, when it comes to the interpretation of each letter itself, he rather uses the 'realism(唯實論)' method of Guwenjingxue(古文經學) to adopt the 'a general definition(通釋語義)' method. This indicates that Yu-hee had a convergent perception of the languages of both 古文經學 and 今文經學 of the late Han period. LiuXi's such reasoning system is also considered as a valuable material in Confucian history that can be compared to that of the Confucian scholars of Song dynasty.

Abstract

Han dynasty is a country that succeeded Qin dynasty, which unified the chaotic Warring States period and perished in less than two decades. Along with a sober assessment on the causes of the collapse of Qin dynasty, Han Wudi(漢武帝) tried to highlight Han’s legitimacy and solidify the political order through stronger centralization. Therefore, a large number of intellectuals were recruited to suppress local hojok(豪族, powerful families) forces and seek new governance ideologies through them. At the center of this work was a man named Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒, B.C.179-B.C.106), whose representative book is 『春秋繁露(Chunqiufanlu)』. He studied the "Chunchu Gongyangjeon" and proposed several key ideas, including 陰陽五行(theory of Yinyang-Wuxing), 天人感應(theory of sensation between heaven and man), 災異說(theory of natural calamity) and 性三品論(theory of the three grades of human nature), which presented theoretical grounds for the political cause and the establishment of royal order of Han dynasty. From this perspective, this study looked into LiuXi(劉熙)’s interpretations of characters(字釋), compared with those of 『春秋繁露(Chunqiufanlu)』 by the three distinctive aspects among theories of Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒) in 『Seok-myeong』 : Yinyang-Wuxing(陰陽五行說), qi(氣) and natural calamity(災異), revered Yang despised Yin(陽尊陰卑). After all, LiuXi(劉熙) accepts and stays in such system of reasons of Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒)’s theories of Yinyang-Wuxing(陰陽五行說), qi(氣) and natural calamity(災異) and revered Yang despised Yin(陽尊陰卑). However, when it comes to the interpretation of each letter itself, he rather uses the 'realism(唯實論)' method of Guwenjingxue(古文經學) to adopt the 'a general definition(通釋語義)' method. This indicates that Yu-hee had a convergent perception of the languages of both 古文經學 and 今文經學 of the late Han period. LiuXi's such reasoning system is also considered as a valuable material in Confucian history that can be compared to that of the Confucian scholars of Song dynasty.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 劉熙, "釋名", 呂柟本
  2. 王先謙, "釋名疏證補" (1895), 淸代
  3. 畢沅, "釋名疏證", 淸代
  4. 董仲舒, "春秋繁露", ~
  5. 허호구, "역주 춘추번로의증" (2016), 소명출판
  6. 조원일, "서한의 유학사상" (2017), 전남대학교 출판부
  7. 劉澤華, "중국 고대 정치사상" (1994), 예문서원
  8. 가와가미 세이사꾸, "인지언어학의 기초" (1997), 한국문화사
  9. 벤자민 슈월츠, "중국고대사상의 세계" (1996), 살림
  10. 홍원식, "동중서 철학의 중국 유학사적 위치", 동아인문학, (39), pp.179~196 (2017), 동아인문학회
  11. 문종하, "신유학의 생생(生生)의 인(仁)에 관한 연구", 유학연구, 44, pp.335~357 (2018), 유학연구소[DOI]
  12. 박동인, "董仲舒의 禮論", 퇴계학보, (127), pp.43~90 (2010), 퇴계학연구원
  13. 박동인, "漢代 讖緯說의 형성과 그 사회·정치적 함의", 유교사상문화연구, (74), pp.193~230 (2018), 한국유교학회[DOI]
  14. 유병헌, "중국의 ‘氣’사상 연구-고대와 중세를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
  15. 서보근, "중국 동중서 사상과 유교통치의 부활", 동아시아문화학회 국제학술대회발표집 (2013)
  16. 김성지, "董仲舒의 陽 중심 사상에 대한 고찰 -『黃帝內經』과의 比較를 통하여-", 대한한의학원전학회지, 22(3), pp.145~160 (2009), 대한한의학원전학회
  17. 정해왕, "董仲舒의 天人感應說과 그 政治性", 동양문화연구, 16, pp.185~220 (2013), 동양문화연구원[DOI]
  18. 정해왕, "漢朝 통치이념의 형성과 董仲舒 사상의 의미 - 사상사적 상호연관성과 종교성에 주목하여 -", 철학연구, 142, pp.265~294 (2017), 대한철학회[DOI]
  19. 오청식, "동중서의 천인감응설과 음양오행에 관한 연구: 위정지도(爲政之道)를 중심으로", 원불교사상과 종교문화, (66), pp.247~279 (2015), 원불교사상연구원
  20. 이연승, "동중서의 천인상관설에 관하여", 종교문화연구, (2) (2000)
  21. 김주창, "物學의 起點, 동중서 철학의 변증적 사유: 一氣、感應、民主 개념을 중심으로", 유학연구, 34, pp.245~264 (2016), 유학연구소[DOI]
  22. 정무, "동중서 유학의 음양설 수용에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2018

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)