北魏 墓誌를 어떻게 읽을 것인가 ― 讀法과 傾向性 探索 ―
How to Read the Bei Wei(北魏) tomb Inscriptions — Exploration of Their Reading and Tendency —
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is no doubt that the Bei Wei(北魏) tomb Inscriptions provide an attractive topic among stone carving materials related to the mourning culture, considering the number and composition of tomb Inscriptions and the periodic divergence of their content. They are even more attractive in that the changing characteristics of their stone carving itself became prominent after the transfer of the capital. The analysis of tomb Inscriptions in terms of appearance and content engraved in stone will help to check the changing aspects of tomb Inscriptions themselves and explore their possibilities as historical materials. It is, however, difficult to affirm the standardization or tendency of Bei Wei tomb Inscriptions at the current moment. There were words engraved in stone since the "tomb Inscriptions of Fengxi(馮熙墓誌)" engraved in the 19th year of King Taihe(太和)'s reign(495), but it is not much difficult to discover tomb Inscriptions missing some of their components including words engraved in stone even 30 years after the year. There were some tomb Inscriptions whose methods of paying tribute to the cemetery hosts were not much different from words engraved in stone before them. It is true that the clues of tomb Inscriptions standardization were confirmed in Bei Wei tomb Inscriptions, but there are no clear answers about the criteria of standardization yet. It is no exaggeration to say that this series of process was to explore the possibilities of converting stone carving materials into historical ones. The conclusion is that stone carving materials have full potential as texts. At the same time, a task emerged which was to overcome the limitation that the depictions of the tomb Inscriptions host's life and also his merit and virtue could be subjective. It might have been already predicted in the process of tomb Inscriptions being converted into records to demonstrate individuals' merit and value from the means of marking.
Abstract
There is no doubt that the Bei Wei(北魏) tomb Inscriptions provide an attractive topic among stone carving materials related to the mourning culture, considering the number and composition of tomb Inscriptions and the periodic divergence of their content. They are even more attractive in that the changing characteristics of their stone carving itself became prominent after the transfer of the capital. The analysis of tomb Inscriptions in terms of appearance and content engraved in stone will help to check the changing aspects of tomb Inscriptions themselves and explore their possibilities as historical materials. It is, however, difficult to affirm the standardization or tendency of Bei Wei tomb Inscriptions at the current moment. There were words engraved in stone since the "tomb Inscriptions of Fengxi(馮熙墓誌)" engraved in the 19th year of King Taihe(太和)'s reign(495), but it is not much difficult to discover tomb Inscriptions missing some of their components including words engraved in stone even 30 years after the year. There were some tomb Inscriptions whose methods of paying tribute to the cemetery hosts were not much different from words engraved in stone before them. It is true that the clues of tomb Inscriptions standardization were confirmed in Bei Wei tomb Inscriptions, but there are no clear answers about the criteria of standardization yet. It is no exaggeration to say that this series of process was to explore the possibilities of converting stone carving materials into historical ones. The conclusion is that stone carving materials have full potential as texts. At the same time, a task emerged which was to overcome the limitation that the depictions of the tomb Inscriptions host's life and also his merit and virtue could be subjective. It might have been already predicted in the process of tomb Inscriptions being converted into records to demonstrate individuals' merit and value from the means of marking.
참고문헌 (36)
- 范曄, "後漢書" (1997), 中華書局
- 沈約, "宋書" (1997), 中華書局
- 魏收, "魏書" (1997), 中華書局
- 房玄齡等, "晉書" (1997), 中華書局
- 司馬光, "資治通鑑" (1976), 中華書局
- 鄭玄, "禮記正義" (1999), 北京大
- 王壯弘, "六朝墓誌檢要" (1985), 上海書畫
- 羅新, "新出魏晉南北朝墓誌疏証" (2005), 中華書局
- 毛遠明, "漢魏六朝碑刻校注 3冊" (2008), 線裝書局
- 趙萬里, "魏晉南北朝墓誌輯釋(石刻史料新編 3輯 3冊 所收)" (1986), 新文豐
- 趙超, "漢魏南北朝墓誌彙編" (1992), 天津古籍
- 韓理洲, "全北魏東魏西魏文補遺" (2010), 三秦
- 北京圖書館金石組, "北京圖書館藏中國歷代石刻拓本匯編 第3冊~8冊 北朝" (1997), 中州古籍
- 毛遠明, "漢魏六朝碑刻異體字典" (2014), 中華書局
- 梶山智史, "北朝隋代墓誌所在總合目錄" (2013), 汲古書院
- 정재윤, "돌의 문화사-돌에 새긴 동아시아 고대의 풍경" (2018), 신서원
- 林登順, "北朝墓誌文研究" (2009), 麗文文化事業
- 김성희, "동아시아 古中世 石刻資料 解題 및 譯註 Ⅳ", 중국사연구, (107), pp.169~209 (2017), 중국사학회[DOI]
- 박한제, "魏晋南北朝時代 石刻資料와 ‘胡’의 서술- 특히 『魏書』의 敍述과 比較하여 -", 중국학보, (70), pp.281~319 (2014), 한국중국학회
- 양진성, "梁代 奉勅撰墓誌를 통해 본 墓誌銘의 定型化 - 墓誌에 등장하는 王言文書 運營方式의 分析을 兼하여 -", 중국사연구, (105), pp.13~51 (2016), 중국사학회
- 홍승현, "北魏時期 墓誌의 定型化와 流行", 동양사학연구, (142), pp.25~69 (2018), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 苗霖霖, "北魏後宮墓誌等級制度試探", 史林, 2010(5) (2010)
- 謝寶富, "北朝墓葬的地下形制硏究", 湖北大學學報, 1997(6) (1997)
- 山西省 考古硏究所, "大同市北魏宋紹祖墓發掘簡報", 文物, 2001(7) (2001)
- 山西省大同市博物館, "山西大同石家寨北魏司馬金龍墓", 文物, 1972(3) (1972)
- 梁建波, "關于北魏司馬金龍墓志的幾个問題", 河北北方學院學報, 31 (2015)
- 王銀田, "元淑墓誌考釋-附北魏高琨墓誌小考", 文物, 1989(8) (1989)
- 殷憲, "北魏早期平城墓銘析", 北朝硏究, 1 (1999)
- 殷憲, "蓋天保墓磚銘考", 北朝硏究, 6 (2008)
- 李凭, "第一屆中日學者中國古代史論壇文集" (2010), 中國社會科學
- 張慶捷, "北魏宋紹祖墓兩處銘記析", 文物, 2001(7) (2001)
- 張志忠, "北朝史硏究-中國魏晉南北朝史國際學術硏討會論文集" (2005), 商務印書館
- 張學鋒, "墓志所見北朝的民族融合-以司馬金龍家族墓志爲線索", 許昌學院學報, 33(3) (2014)
- 趙超, "試談北魏墓誌的等級制度", 中原文物, 2002(1) (2002)
- 久田麻實子, "墓誌銘の成立過程について-北魏墓誌銘の意義", 中國學志, 14 (1999)
- 梶山智史, "北魏墓誌銘の出現", 駿台史學, 157 (2016)
