본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

唐代의 胡服과 服妖

A Study on Hufu(胡服) and Fuyao(服妖) in Tang(唐) Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The wearing of the ‘Hufu(胡服)’ is expressed as a sign or symbol of political and social disturbance and destruction of the country in the discussion papers that run through the first chapters of 『Jiutangshu(舊唐書)』, ‘Yufuzhi(輿服志)’ and 『Xintangshu(新唐書)』 ‘Chefuzhi(車服志)’. For this reason, in previous studies, the wearing of hufu was usually identified as the cause of political and social chaos and the collapse of Tang Dynasty. However, in 『Jiutangshu』 and 『Xintangshu』 ‘Wuxingzhi(五行志)’, the ‘Fuyao(服妖)’, that is, the disorder of clothes, does not only refer to the wearing of hufu. Nevertheless, hufu was recorded as the cause of the disturbance of the political and social order and the ruin of the country, and that view has continued. In this paper, by analyzing the contents of ‘Yufuzhi’, ‘Chefuzhi’ and ‘Wuxingzhi’ in 『Jiutangshu』 and 『Xintangshu』, ‘Fuyao’ refers to various phenomena as well as wearing hufu, wanted to clarify. It was confirmed that ‘Fuyao’ is actually a violation of the system or laws rather than wearing a hufu, to change the existing clothing system, to wear men's and women's clothing without distinction, and to enjoy splendid and luxurious clothing. Wearing of hufu was recorded as a sign or cause of the exile of the Tang Dynasty, and the reason why they were criticized was that the cause of a coup such as the Anshi(安史) Rebellion was found in the influx of hufu, and the cause of the decline of the national government at the end of the Tang Dynasty was found in the fashion of hufeng. This can be seen from the fact that the number of records on fuyao increased significantly in the 『Xintangshu』 compared to that of the 『Jiutangshu』, and also in the fact that the number of cases related to hufu also increased. Rather, it seems that 『Jiutangshu』, ‘Yufuzhi’ and 『Xintangshu』 and ‘Chefuzhi’ criticized the hufu, but praised its convenience in the details, and ‘Wuxingzhi’, talking about fuyao, rather than hufu, it was a disorder of the dress system. Luxury and men's clothing were mentioned more. In the end, in fuyao in ‘Wuxingzhi’, the problem was not the suit itself, but the disorder, luxury, and men’s clothing as the problem. Therefore, hufu could still flow in, use, and become popular even after time passed. Although there are aspects of clothing that reflect ideology and ideology, it is probably because practicality and convenience were prioritized above all else.

Abstract

The wearing of the ‘Hufu(胡服)’ is expressed as a sign or symbol of political and social disturbance and destruction of the country in the discussion papers that run through the first chapters of 『Jiutangshu(舊唐書)』, ‘Yufuzhi(輿服志)’ and 『Xintangshu(新唐書)』 ‘Chefuzhi(車服志)’. For this reason, in previous studies, the wearing of hufu was usually identified as the cause of political and social chaos and the collapse of Tang Dynasty. However, in 『Jiutangshu』 and 『Xintangshu』 ‘Wuxingzhi(五行志)’, the ‘Fuyao(服妖)’, that is, the disorder of clothes, does not only refer to the wearing of hufu. Nevertheless, hufu was recorded as the cause of the disturbance of the political and social order and the ruin of the country, and that view has continued. In this paper, by analyzing the contents of ‘Yufuzhi’, ‘Chefuzhi’ and ‘Wuxingzhi’ in 『Jiutangshu』 and 『Xintangshu』, ‘Fuyao’ refers to various phenomena as well as wearing hufu, wanted to clarify. It was confirmed that ‘Fuyao’ is actually a violation of the system or laws rather than wearing a hufu, to change the existing clothing system, to wear men's and women's clothing without distinction, and to enjoy splendid and luxurious clothing. Wearing of hufu was recorded as a sign or cause of the exile of the Tang Dynasty, and the reason why they were criticized was that the cause of a coup such as the Anshi(安史) Rebellion was found in the influx of hufu, and the cause of the decline of the national government at the end of the Tang Dynasty was found in the fashion of hufeng. This can be seen from the fact that the number of records on fuyao increased significantly in the 『Xintangshu』 compared to that of the 『Jiutangshu』, and also in the fact that the number of cases related to hufu also increased. Rather, it seems that 『Jiutangshu』, ‘Yufuzhi’ and 『Xintangshu』 and ‘Chefuzhi’ criticized the hufu, but praised its convenience in the details, and ‘Wuxingzhi’, talking about fuyao, rather than hufu, it was a disorder of the dress system. Luxury and men's clothing were mentioned more. In the end, in fuyao in ‘Wuxingzhi’, the problem was not the suit itself, but the disorder, luxury, and men’s clothing as the problem. Therefore, hufu could still flow in, use, and become popular even after time passed. Although there are aspects of clothing that reflect ideology and ideology, it is probably because practicality and convenience were prioritized above all else.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 권현주, "접섭대(帶)에 관한 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.211~230 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
  2. 김성규, "중국 服飾史에서 ‘胡服’의 수용과 영향", 전북사학, (63), pp.261~292 (2021), 전북사학회
  3. 김소현, "실크로드의 복식 호복" (2003), 민속원
  4. 김한신, "唐・宋代 災異論의 변화 ― 『舊唐書』 「五行志」 및 『新唐書』 「五行志」에 대한 분석을 중심으로 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (60), pp.85~107 (2021), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  5. 순샤오동, "영화 ‘요묘전(妖猫传)’에 나타난 당(唐)대 성당(盛唐) 여성 복식 연구", 한국패션디자인학회지, 20(1), pp.161~171 (2020), 한국패션디자인학회[DOI]
  6. 안현주, "唐代 <王會圖>의 使臣服飾 硏究", 박사, pp.2019
  7. 柳惠英, "敦煌石窟壁畵에 보이는 一般服飾의 연구", 박사, 의류직물학, pp.1992
  8. 윤지원, "당대 여자 복식에 나타난 도교와 불교의 영향", 중앙아시아 연구, (11) (2006)
  9. 윤지원, "당대 무용복의 호풍(胡風)에 관한 연구", 복식, 49 (1999)
  10. 윤지원, "中國 舞踊 服飾을 통해 본 異國的 취향의 移入 현상에 관한 연구 -漢代부터 隋唐代 長袖衣와 羽衣를 중심으로-", 복식, 55(4), pp.124~137 (2005), 한국복식학회
  11. 조현진, "당대 둔황석굴 벽화에 묘사된 여자복식을 통해 본 글로컬 복합 문화", 한국과학예술융합학회, 39(1), pp.437~450 (2021), 한국전시산업융합연구원[DOI]
  12. 조현진, "북조시대 둔황석굴벽화에 묘사된 동서 융합적 종교복식문화에 관한 연구", 한국과학예술융합학회, 39(4), pp.489~503 (2021), 한국전시산업융합연구원[DOI]
  13. 姜愛萍, "唐代“服妖”硏究", 碩士, pp.2016
  14. 寧稼雨, "<世說新語>與<晉書>中“服妖”現象解析", 山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版, (5) (2008)
  15. 譚重言, "胡服盛行與女着男裝-論唐代前期服飾風尙與女性社會地位關係", 文博, (4) (2019)
  16. 杜嫻婷, "性別角色認同視覺下的女着男裝現象-以唐朝女性服飾爲例", 碩士, pp.2011
  17. 劉復生, "宋代“衣服變古”及其時代特徵-兼論“服妖”現象的社會意義", 中國史硏究, (2) (1998)
  18. 蕭利國, "胡風東漸與文化認同-論唐前期文化共同體建構的特殊歷史意義", 北京化工大學學報, 1 (2020)
  19. 潘曉明, "中國古代"服妖"芻議", 浙江工藝美術, (1) (1998)
  20. 沈曉燕, "“胡風”與唐前期宮廷婦女的政治參與", 碩士, pp.2009
  21. 吳江, "胡服風尙影響下的盛唐宮廷女性服飾硏究", 碩士, pp.2017
  22. 吳明懌, "論安史之亂后古漢語文學作品中對“胡風”的反思", 討論與爭鳴, (11) (2020)
  23. 張琳琳, "從感性到理性: 胡文化在唐宋內地傳播的不同境遇-以胡服爲視國", 碩士, pp.2010
  24. 左敏, "論唐代本土與異域服飾文化的融合", 碩士, pp.2010
  25. 周怡, "胡族服飾與唐代宮廷服飾", 碩士, pp.2013
  26. 陳寶良, "服飾與時世裝: 古代中國的服飾世界和倫理世界", 藝術設計硏究, (4) (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)