조선시대 복식 풍속과 ‘복요(服妖)’ 논란
A Study on the ‘Bok-yo(服妖)’ of the Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘Bok-yo(服妖)’ literally means that the clothes are unusual and odd. According as the manners and customs became luxurious and degraded, the clothes also became unusual and odd. This research observes 'Bok-yo(服妖)' as historical concept that is implying a feeling of danger about social downfall together as manners is been extravagant and degrades, it is happened puffer for Joseon Dynasty and would try to examine point issues of manners and customs of the clothes in Joseon Dynasty through this controversy. The following is conclusion of those. Because Joseon Dynasty corresponds to the tree[木] among five elements, 'Bok-yo(服妖)' with 'Mok-yo(木妖)‘ that is criticism about luxurious trends of house embellishment gave rise to a feeling of danger that Joseon Dynasty would perish. Even though establishing law about the disorder of woman dress and its ornaments manners, that's not possible to easily solve that problem. On Division of high and low collapsing because of luxurious trends of Early Joseon, the dread that this collapse of man and woman dress and its ornaments division was going forward by to pull down man and woman's division resulted in that 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy. Yangseongji(梁誠之) in Sejo(世祖)'s reign(1455-1468) insisted to the King that this tendency must be 'Bok-yo(服妖)' which this collapse of man and woman dress and its ornaments division was going forward by to pull down man and woman's division. He said that If there were man and woman's division first with dress and its ornaments system, then there must be division of high and low, but division of high and low was collapsing because of luxurious trends, a man and woman's division was collapsing by virilism of woman dress and its ornaments manners. He also insisted that as that women in the all country was enjoying wearing Jang-ui(長衣) like men, it is this 'Bok-yo(服妖)', that the clothes are unusual and odd as signs that bring a calamity in the country in word. Yangseongji(梁誠之) raised that woman's dress and its ornaments tendency was disordered once again on dimension of 'bok-yo(服妖)' in Seongjong(成宗) 9 year. He said that wearing yellow dress(黃衣) freely without distinction of high and low status, Yangban(兩班)'s women warehousing clothes and calling Wonsam(圓衫), attaching Hyungbae(胸背) on it did not think to be strange as going to city very middle on daylight in the least. Women's setup who go attaching Hyungbae(胸背) on this Wonsam(圓衫) similar to men's gwanbok(官服), because familiar attire of women of a skirt and jacket form was not, as man- Confucianist- bureaucracy's eye such as Yangseongji(梁誠之) it is that 'Bok-yo(服妖)' repeatedly warning in historical records that manners and customs of the clothes of women's warehousing clothes and calling Wonsam(圓衫), attaching Hyungbae(胸背) on it and striding broad way very middle on daylight. Development of Commerce and the Money Economy in the latter half of Joseon Dynasty supported luxurious customs. By the way, it is usual practice that these luxury begins in dress and its ornaments as for populace phenomenon. Because man can parade his own luxury through dress and its ornaments the most easily, the most notedly and most fast, the manners and customs that the luxury was demonstrated in woman's dress and its ornaments in the latter half of Joseon Dynasty were a kind of tendency of jeogory(저고리)‘s short-cut and Gache(毠髢). And A man-confucianist's resistance about this new sexual pursuit of woman dress and its ornaments manners brought about what is called 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy. In short, it was public order establishment through recovery of man and woman's traditional moral principle of Seongrihak(性理學) that Sadaebu(士大夫) losed control of his own society and presented by the alternative as running into crisis situation. Through a prohibition of Gache(毠髢) by law Yeongjo(英祖) and Jeongjo(正祖) established, we can see this effort to reform woman's sexual pursuit tendency at that time. As Seongho(星湖) Yiik(李瀷) also tried to recover the woman's traditional moral principle of Seongrihak(性理學) at that time, It was common to Silhakja(實學者) who would try to transcend limit of such legal action and reform manners well. 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy about this new sexual pursuit of woman dress and its ornaments manners such as tendency of jeogory(저고리)‘s short-cut and Gache(毠髢) happened actively in Yeongjo(英祖) and Jeongjo(正祖)'s ages is reflecting such an atmosphere. As for the man's dress and its ornaments manners in the latter half of Joseon Dynasty, we can see the 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy about Simui(深衣) and Bokgeon(幅巾). There were differences in composition of simui(深衣) according to dangpasaek(黨派色), also wearing Bokgeon(幅巾) was influenced by that. And They criticized each other's Simui(深衣) and bokgeon(幅巾) as 'Bok-yo(服妖)'. Through this 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy of men's Simui(深衣) and Bokgeon(幅巾), we came to know that this controversy on men's clothes were not that was relating to pattern of dress and its ornaments such as woman, but that was relating to interpretation on Jujahak(朱子學) mainly.
Abstract
‘Bok-yo(服妖)’ literally means that the clothes are unusual and odd. According as the manners and customs became luxurious and degraded, the clothes also became unusual and odd. This research observes 'Bok-yo(服妖)' as historical concept that is implying a feeling of danger about social downfall together as manners is been extravagant and degrades, it is happened puffer for Joseon Dynasty and would try to examine point issues of manners and customs of the clothes in Joseon Dynasty through this controversy. The following is conclusion of those. Because Joseon Dynasty corresponds to the tree[木] among five elements, 'Bok-yo(服妖)' with 'Mok-yo(木妖)‘ that is criticism about luxurious trends of house embellishment gave rise to a feeling of danger that Joseon Dynasty would perish. Even though establishing law about the disorder of woman dress and its ornaments manners, that's not possible to easily solve that problem. On Division of high and low collapsing because of luxurious trends of Early Joseon, the dread that this collapse of man and woman dress and its ornaments division was going forward by to pull down man and woman's division resulted in that 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy. Yangseongji(梁誠之) in Sejo(世祖)'s reign(1455-1468) insisted to the King that this tendency must be 'Bok-yo(服妖)' which this collapse of man and woman dress and its ornaments division was going forward by to pull down man and woman's division. He said that If there were man and woman's division first with dress and its ornaments system, then there must be division of high and low, but division of high and low was collapsing because of luxurious trends, a man and woman's division was collapsing by virilism of woman dress and its ornaments manners. He also insisted that as that women in the all country was enjoying wearing Jang-ui(長衣) like men, it is this 'Bok-yo(服妖)', that the clothes are unusual and odd as signs that bring a calamity in the country in word. Yangseongji(梁誠之) raised that woman's dress and its ornaments tendency was disordered once again on dimension of 'bok-yo(服妖)' in Seongjong(成宗) 9 year. He said that wearing yellow dress(黃衣) freely without distinction of high and low status, Yangban(兩班)'s women warehousing clothes and calling Wonsam(圓衫), attaching Hyungbae(胸背) on it did not think to be strange as going to city very middle on daylight in the least. Women's setup who go attaching Hyungbae(胸背) on this Wonsam(圓衫) similar to men's gwanbok(官服), because familiar attire of women of a skirt and jacket form was not, as man- Confucianist- bureaucracy's eye such as Yangseongji(梁誠之) it is that 'Bok-yo(服妖)' repeatedly warning in historical records that manners and customs of the clothes of women's warehousing clothes and calling Wonsam(圓衫), attaching Hyungbae(胸背) on it and striding broad way very middle on daylight. Development of Commerce and the Money Economy in the latter half of Joseon Dynasty supported luxurious customs. By the way, it is usual practice that these luxury begins in dress and its ornaments as for populace phenomenon. Because man can parade his own luxury through dress and its ornaments the most easily, the most notedly and most fast, the manners and customs that the luxury was demonstrated in woman's dress and its ornaments in the latter half of Joseon Dynasty were a kind of tendency of jeogory(저고리)‘s short-cut and Gache(毠髢). And A man-confucianist's resistance about this new sexual pursuit of woman dress and its ornaments manners brought about what is called 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy. In short, it was public order establishment through recovery of man and woman's traditional moral principle of Seongrihak(性理學) that Sadaebu(士大夫) losed control of his own society and presented by the alternative as running into crisis situation. Through a prohibition of Gache(毠髢) by law Yeongjo(英祖) and Jeongjo(正祖) established, we can see this effort to reform woman's sexual pursuit tendency at that time. As Seongho(星湖) Yiik(李瀷) also tried to recover the woman's traditional moral principle of Seongrihak(性理學) at that time, It was common to Silhakja(實學者) who would try to transcend limit of such legal action and reform manners well. 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy about this new sexual pursuit of woman dress and its ornaments manners such as tendency of jeogory(저고리)‘s short-cut and Gache(毠髢) happened actively in Yeongjo(英祖) and Jeongjo(正祖)'s ages is reflecting such an atmosphere. As for the man's dress and its ornaments manners in the latter half of Joseon Dynasty, we can see the 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy about Simui(深衣) and Bokgeon(幅巾). There were differences in composition of simui(深衣) according to dangpasaek(黨派色), also wearing Bokgeon(幅巾) was influenced by that. And They criticized each other's Simui(深衣) and bokgeon(幅巾) as 'Bok-yo(服妖)'. Through this 'Bok-yo(服妖)' controversy of men's Simui(深衣) and Bokgeon(幅巾), we came to know that this controversy on men's clothes were not that was relating to pattern of dress and its ornaments such as woman, but that was relating to interpretation on Jujahak(朱子學) mainly.
참고문헌 (32)
- 국립중앙박물관, "조선시대 風俗畵" (2002)
- 국립공주박물관, "오백년만의 해후" (2006)
- 금기숙, "조선복식미술" (2005), 열화당
- 金東旭, "韓國服飾史硏究" (1973), 아세아문화사
- 김명자, "의상학총론" (1997), 학문사
- 김영숙, "한국복식문화사전" (1999), 도서출판 미술문화
- 단국대학교 석주선기념박물관, "衣" (1996)
- 단국대학교 석주선기념박물관, "名選 下" (2005)
- 단국대학교 석주선기념박물관, "다시 태어난 우리옷 환생" (2006)
- 박성실, "임진왜란 전후 출토단령의 실증적 고찰" (2005), 민속원
- 유송옥, "한국복식사" (1998), 수학사
- 유희경, "한국복식사연구" (2002), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 유희경, "한국복식문화사" (2000), 敎文社
- 정병모, "한국의 풍속화" (2000), 한길아트
- 충북대학교박물관, "한성부 판윤 김원택 묘역 출토복식" (2006)
- 한영우, "실학의 선구자 이수광" (2007), 경세원
- 에두아르트 푹스, "풍속의 역사 Ⅱ 르네상스" (1986), 까치
- 周錫保, "中國古代服飾史" (1986), 丹靑圖書有限公司
- 고부자, "조선시대 남자복식, In 다시 태어난 우리옷 환생" (2006), 석주선기념박물관
- 김동욱, "출토조선시대유의의 복식사적 연구", 복식, 2 (1978)
- 김정자, "深衣構成에 관한 硏究", 韓國服飾, 8 (1990)
- 박성실, "조선전기 출토 복식연구", 복식, 19 (1992)
- 박성실, "16세기 출토 여복(女服)의 복식사적 고찰", 坡平尹氏 母子 미라 종합연구논문집 (2003)
- 박성실, "출토복식을 통해보는 임진왜란 이전 남녀복식의 조형적 특징", 한국복식, 24 (2006)
- 송미경, "조선시대 여성 단령(<한문>)에 관한 연구 -출토복식을 중심으로-", 복식, 52(8), pp.151~160 (2002), 한국복식학회
- 송미경, "16세기 여성 복식에 관한 연구", 복식, 57(8), pp.125~136 (2007), 한국복식학회
- 유송옥, "조선시대 출토 복식을 통해 본 남자포연구", 대동문화연구, 18 (1982)
- 이은주, "長기 鄭氏1565~1614) 墓의 출토복식 -17세기 초 葬俗과 襲衣를 중심으로 -", 복식, 53(3), pp.73~87 (2003), 한국복식학회
- 이해영, "장옷에 관한 연구(1)", 한복문화, 8(2), pp.69~78 (2005), 한복문화학회
- 임영자, "조선후기 기녀의 머리형태가 일반여성의 머리형태에 미친 영향", 복식, 54(3), pp.1~11 (2004), 한국복식학회
- 정혜경, "조선시대 철릭과 남자 포류와의 상호관계", 한국의류학회지, 24(2) (2000)
- 조효순, "거가잡복고를 통해 본 조선시대의 복식 풍속", 복식, 15 (1990)
