본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교통약자를 위한 특별교통수단의 운영효율성 평가

Evaluation of Operations Efficiency in Special Transportation Services for the Transportation Vulnerable

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

교통약자의 이동편의 증진법이 2005년에 제정된 이후, 정부는 교통약자를 위한 특별 차량의 수를 적극적으로 증가시켰고, 2016년 말에는 전국 평균으로 법정 차량 수의 100% 이상을 달성하였다. 그동안 정부의 정책이 각 지방자치단체에 적용된 법정 차량 수를 충족시키기 위한 양적 성장에 주로 집중되었다면, 이제는 서비스의 효율적인 운영에 좀 더 집중할 필요가 있다. 더욱이 특별교통수단의 운영 비용이 대부분 지방 예산에 의해 충당되고 있어 서비스의 지속가능성을 위한 통합적인 운영 효율성 평가가 중요하게 되었고, 각 지역의 특별교통수단이 독점적 형태로 운영되고 있기 때문에 지역 별로 운행되고 있는 특별교통수단의 상대적 평가의 필요성 또한 증가하였다. 따라서, 본 연구는 자료포락분석(Data Envelopment Analysis)을 사용하여 특별교통수단의 운영에 관한 통합적이고, 상대적인 효율성 평가를 국내 최초로 실시하였다. 또한, 특별교통수단의 효율성에 영향을 미치는 변수를 새롭게 제안하여 이들의 유의성을 통계적으로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는, 향후 특별교통수단에 대한 정책 수립 및 관리자의 운영에 도움을 제공하고, 운영 효율성의 향상에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Abstract

Since “The Mobility Enhancement for the Mobility Impaired Act” was enacted in 2005, the government has actively increased the number of special vehicles for the transportation vulnerable, and the nationwide average reached more than 100% of the statutory number of special vehicles by the end of 2016. While the government's policy has focused primarily on quantitative growth, it is now necessary to concentrate more on efficient operations in services. Furthermore, since most of the operating costs of special transportation services (STS) are covered by municipal budgets, a comprehensive evaluation of operations efficiency becomes imperative for the sustainability of the services. In addition, the necessity for relative evaluation has also increased because the STS in each region are monopolistically operated. This study used DEA to evaluate the comprehensive and relative efficiency of the operations of the STS in Korea for the first time. This research also proposed a new variable affecting the efficiency of the STS, and statistically analyzed its significance. The results of this study are expected to help policy makers and the management of STS and contribute to the improvement in operations efficiency.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. 건설교통부, "교통약자이동편의증진계획(’07~’11)", ~ (2007)
  2. "국가법령정보센터"[URL]
  3. 국토교통부, "3차 교통약자 이동편의 증진계획(2017~2021)", ~ (2016)
  4. 국토해양부, "제2차 교통약자 이동편의 증진계획(2012~2016)", ~ (2011)
  5. 수요대응형 교통체계 평가모형 구축, "박상우", 한국교통연구원, ~ (2008)
  6. 박준태, "설문기법을 활용한 교통약자이동시설 개선방안연구", 교통 기술과 정책, 9(1), pp.57~66 (2012)
  7. 경기도 특별교통수단과 이동지원센터 도입⋅운영에 관한 연구, "빈미영", 경기개발연구원, ~ (2009)
  8. 인천광역시 장애인콜택시 운영 개선 방안, "석종수", 인천발전연구원, ~ (2012)
  9. 송기욱, "특별교통수단 효율성 제고를 위한 준특별교통수단적정비율 산정 연구 - 동남권(부산·울산·경남)사례를 중심으로 -", 국토계획, 50(2), pp.143~155 (2015), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  10. 안성관, "신제품 설계 및 품질 개선 측면에서 본 무상보증기간 중 항만시설장비 고장 분석", 한국생산관리학회지, 29(2), pp.225~243 (2018), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  11. 장애인 이동수단 지원방안 연구 - 교통수단을 중심으로, "오혜경", 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원, 1~86 (1993)
  12. 이규진, "특별교통서비스의 이용실태 및 활성화 방안 연구:수원시를 중심으로", 한국ITS학회 논문지, 15(5), pp.1~11 (2016), 한국ITS학회[DOI]
  13. 이수현, "DEA모형을 활용한 국내 해운항공기업의 정태적․동태적 효율성 분석", 한국생산관리학회지, 29(4), pp.397~417 (2018), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  14. 이평수, "저가항공사의 운영효율성과 판매효율성 분석", 한국생산관리학회지, 28(2), pp.201~220 (2017), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  15. 정헌영, "순서형 로짓 모델을 이용한 두리발 이용자의 일반택시로의 수단전환에 관한 연구", 대한교통학회지, 31(5), pp.79~88 (2013), 대한교통학회
  16. 지우석, "교통약자정책, 교통복지의 시작", 이슈&진단, (173) (2015)
  17. Banker, R. D., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 30(9), pp.1078~1092 (1984)
  18. Barnum, D. T., "Using Panel Data Analysis to Estimate DEA Confidence Intervals Adjusted for the Environment", J. Transp. Eng., 134, pp.215~223 (2008)
  19. Barnum, D. T., "Using Panel Data Analysis to Estimate Confidence Intervals for the DEA Efficiency of Individual Decision Making Units", Applied Eco, 41, pp.3319~3326 (2009)
  20. Benjamin, J. M., "A Study of the Impact of APTS on Service Quality Perceptions of Elderly and Disabled Riders", Journal of Public Transportation, 9(1), pp.1~18 (2006)
  21. Bower, D. J., "Automated Paratransit Routing and Scheduling Using a Highway Network Model", Transportation Research Record, 1292, pp.15~23 (1991)
  22. Brockett, P. L., "Using Rank Statistics for Determining Programmatic Efficiency Differences in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 42(3), pp.466~472 (1996)
  23. Chang, Y. T., "Efficiency Analysis of Major Cruise Lines", Tourism Management, 58, pp.78~88 (2017)
  24. Charnes, A., "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp.429~444 (1978)
  25. Chira-Chavara, T., "Cost and Productivity Impacts of a ”Smart“ Paratransit System", Transportation Research Record, 1571, pp.81~87 (1997)
  26. Cook, W. D., "Data envelopment analysis: balanced benchmarking" (2013), Create Space Independent Publishing Platform
  27. Cook, W. D., "Data Envelopment Analysis: Prior to Choosing a Model", Omega, 44, pp.1~4 (2014)
  28. Cooper, W. W., "Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software" (2007), Springer Science & Business Media
  29. Cowie, J., "Organisation Form, Scale Effects and Efficiency in the British Bus Industry", Transportation, 26, pp.231~248 (1999)
  30. Daraio, C., "Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Urban Public Transport Sector: A Critical Review with Directions for Future Research", European Journal of Operations Research, 248, pp.1~20 (2016)
  31. Dyson, R. G., "Pitfalls and protocols in DEA", European Journal of Operational Research, 132, pp.245~259 (2001)
  32. Fasone, V., "Measuring Business Performance in the Airport Context: A Critical Review of Literature", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(8), pp.1137~1158 (2016)
  33. Fragoudaki, A., "Airport Performance in a Tourism Receiving Country: Evidence from Greece", Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, pp.80~89 (2016)
  34. Fu, L., "Quantifying Technical Efficiency of Paratransit Systems by Data Envelopment Analysis Method", Transportation Research Record, 2034, pp.115~122 (2007)
  35. Fuentes, R., "Smoothed Bootstrap Malmquist Index Based on DEA Model to Compute Productivity of Tax Offices", Expert Systems with Applications, 42, pp.2442~2450 (2015)
  36. Gupta, D., "Improving the Efficiency of Demand-Responsive Paratransit Services", Transportation Research Part A, 44, pp.201~217 (2010)
  37. Husain, N., "Evaluating Public Sector Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): A Case Study in Road Transport Department, Selangor, Malaysia", Total Quality Management, 11(4, pp.5&6) (2000), S830~S836
  38. Kuosmanen, T., "Theory of Integer-valued Data Envelopment Analysis", European Journal of Operational Research, 192, pp.658~667 (2009)
  39. Lee, B. L., "Technical Efficiency of Mainstream Airlines and Lowcost Carriers: New Evidence Using Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis Truncated Regression", Journal of Air Transport Management, 38, pp.15~20 (2014)
  40. Matin, R. K., "Theory of Integer-valued Data Envelopment Analysis under Alternative Returns to Scale Axioms", Omega, 37, pp.988~995 (2009)
  41. Min, H., "Benchmarking and Evaluating the Comparative Efficiency of Urban Paratransit Systems in the United States: AData Envelopment Analysis Approach", Journal of Transportation Management, 21(2A), pp.48~62 (2010)
  42. Min, H., "Dynamic Benchmarking of Mass Transit Systems in the United States Using Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Productivity Index", Journal of Business Logistics, 38(1), pp.55~73 (2017)
  43. Mishra, S., "Performance Indicators for Public Transit Connectivity in Multi-Modal Transportation Networks", Transportation Research Part A, 46, pp.1066~1085 (2012)
  44. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "Guidebook for measuring, Assessing, and Improving Performance of Demand-Responsive Transportation" (2008), The National Academies Press
  45. Nguyen-Hoang, P., "What Is Paratransit Worth?", Transportation Research Part A, 44, pp.841~853 (2010)
  46. Odeck, J., "The Performance of Subsidized Urban and Rural Public Bus Operators: Empirical Evidence from Norway", Ann Reg Sci, 38, pp.413~431 (2004)
  47. Padgett, L. V., "Practical statistical methods" (2011), CRS Press
  48. Pagano, A. M., "Effect of Computer-Assisted Scheduling and Dispatching Systems on Paratransit Service Quality", Transportation Research Record, 1791(1), pp.51~58
  49. Palmer, K., "Impacts of Management Practices and Advanced Technologies on Demand Responsive Transit Systems", Transportation Research Part A, 38, pp.495~509 (2004)
  50. Palmer, K., "Factors Influencing Productivity and Operating Cost of Demand Responsive Transit", Transportation Research Part A, 42, pp.503~523 (2008)
  51. Raab, R., "Identifying Subareas That Comprise a Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency", Journal of Regional Science, 42(3), pp.579~594 (2002)
  52. Tone, K., "Advances in DEA Theory and Applications: With Extensions to Forecasting Models" (2017), John Wiley & Sons Ltd
  53. Yu, M. M., "Measuring physical efficiency of domestic airports in Taiwan with undesirable outputs and environmental factors", Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, pp.295~303 (2004)
  54. Yuen, A. C., "Foreign Participation and Competition: A way to Improve the Container Port Efficiency in China?", Transportation Research Part A, 49, pp.220~231 (2013)
  55. Zhang, C., "Performance Evaluation of Public Transit Systems Using a Combined Evaluation Method", Transport Policy, 45, pp.156~167 (2016)
  56. Zhang, Y. J., "Evaluating the Dynamic Performance of Energy Portfolios: Empirical Evidence from the DEA Directional Distance Function", European Journal of Operational Research, 269, pp.64~78 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)