고령친화도시 평가지표의 중요도 분석에 관한 탐색적 연구
Exploratory Study of Priorities on Age Friendly Evaluation Index
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Developing environments responsive to the aspiration and needs of older people has become a major concern for social and public policy. The objective of study are to develope indicators and setting its priorities for evaluation age-friendliness of urban setting. Indicators can be instrumental in establishing a common understanding among stakeholders about the key dimensions of age-friendliness that are valued in the way, and set goals and objectives in relation to them. The indicators were developed through literature review and expert consultation. Research findings are as follows. First, indicators of social environments are more valued than that of physical ones. Second, assisting health management and economic security were assessed for important factors in age-friendliness for old persons. Third, encouraging environment living more aging in place are another important aspect of age-friendliness.
Abstract
Developing environments responsive to the aspiration and needs of older people has become a major concern for social and public policy. The objective of study are to develope indicators and setting its priorities for evaluation age-friendliness of urban setting. Indicators can be instrumental in establishing a common understanding among stakeholders about the key dimensions of age-friendliness that are valued in the way, and set goals and objectives in relation to them. The indicators were developed through literature review and expert consultation. Research findings are as follows. First, indicators of social environments are more valued than that of physical ones. Second, assisting health management and economic security were assessed for important factors in age-friendliness for old persons. Third, encouraging environment living more aging in place are another important aspect of age-friendliness.
참고문헌 (16)
- 나건, "사례분석을 통한 고령친화도시 디자인 개발방향연구", 디지털융복합연구, 15(6), pp.61~69 (2017), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 박경순, "고령친화도시 점검 단축형 척도의 개발과 타당화 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 16(9), pp.580~589 (2016), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 대구 고령친화도시 평가지표 개발, "박은희", 대구경북개발연구원, 83~98 (2017)
- 고령친화도시 조성지원을 위한 초고령사회 전북 노인복지모델 개발, "박진경", 한국지방행정연구원, ~ (2020)
- 오경상, "AHP 기법을 이용한 블록체인 기술 특성 기반 상대적 중요도 우선순위 분석", 디지털융복합연구, 19(6), pp.239~250 (2021), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 이광현, "7개 특･광역시의 고령친화도와 고령친화정책 비교에 관한 연구", 국토연구, 102, pp.83~98 (2019), 국토연구원[DOI]
- 한상천, "국내 고령친화도시 체크리스트의 개발 및 적용: 서울특별시 동남권 4개 자치구를 대상으로", 도시부동산연구, 9(1), pp.49~65 (2018), 한국도시부동산학회[DOI]
- Davern, M., "How Can the LIved Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Frame work for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communites", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, pp.1~20 (2020)
- Kano, M., "A Global Pilot Study Age-Friendly City Indicators", Social Indicators Research, 138, pp.1205~1227 (2018)
- Kyeongmo, K., "Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings from the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey", The Gerontologist, 20(20), pp.1~11 (2021)
- Luciano, A., "Measuring Age-Friendly Housing: A Framework", Sustainablity, 12, pp.1~35 (2020)
- Lui, C.-W., "What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature", Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), pp.116~121 (2009)
- Menec, V. H., "Conceptualizing Age-Friendly Communities", Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), pp.479~493 (2011)
- Orpana, H., "Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: Process and results", Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can, 36(10), pp.214~223 (2016)
- Stern, A. A., "Prioritizing Age-Friendly Domains for Transforming a Mid-Sized American City", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, pp.1~30 (2020)[DOI]
- "세계보건기구"[URL]