서남해 해상풍력 실증단지에서 조류의 분포, 비행고도 그리고 서식지 이용
Distribution, flight altitude, and habitat use of birds at the Demonstration Offshore Wind Farm in the Southern Part of the West Sea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We observed five species and 163 individuals of birds in the Demonstration Offshore Wind Farm in the southern part of the West Sea in Korea, and 33 species and 4,023 individuals from Gusipo to Dongho Beach. The most dominant bird in both areas was the black-tailed gull, Larus crassirostris. The flight height of birds for collision risk (wind turbine and bird) was divided into two groups. First, the safe height was from sea level to 20 m (< 20 m), with no effect from the action of revolving blades. Second, the danger height was more than 20 m from sea level (> 20 m), with a collision risk from the action of revolving blades. Birds flying a safe height (< 20 m) were 83.9% (271 individuals) and danger height (> 20 m) were 16.1% (52 individuals). Also, 11.7% of birds (35 individuals) used the inside of the Demonstration Offshore Wind Farm as a habitat for foraging and resting, and 88.3% birds used the outside. We suggest that the risk of collision with the wind farm was low due to the relatively low flight height of birds and distance between wind turbines (> 800 m).
Abstract
We observed five species and 163 individuals of birds in the Demonstration Offshore Wind Farm in the southern part of the West Sea in Korea, and 33 species and 4,023 individuals from Gusipo to Dongho Beach. The most dominant bird in both areas was the black-tailed gull, Larus crassirostris. The flight height of birds for collision risk (wind turbine and bird) was divided into two groups. First, the safe height was from sea level to 20 m (< 20 m), with no effect from the action of revolving blades. Second, the danger height was more than 20 m from sea level (> 20 m), with a collision risk from the action of revolving blades. Birds flying a safe height (< 20 m) were 83.9% (271 individuals) and danger height (> 20 m) were 16.1% (52 individuals). Also, 11.7% of birds (35 individuals) used the inside of the Demonstration Offshore Wind Farm as a habitat for foraging and resting, and 88.3% birds used the outside. We suggest that the risk of collision with the wind farm was low due to the relatively low flight height of birds and distance between wind turbines (> 800 m).
참고문헌 (39)
- 8th Electricity Supply and Demand Plan (2017-2031), "Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy", ~ (2017)
- Relevant Ministries, "Reinforcement of Renewable Energy Industry", ~ (2019)
- 홍미진, "해상풍력이 조류에 미치는 영향 평가를 위한 모니터링 필요성", 풍력에너지저널, 10(3), pp.31~41 (2019), 한국풍력에너지학회[DOI]
- Bevanger, K., "Bird interactions with utility structures: collision and electrocution, causes and mitigating measures", IBIS, 136, pp.412~425 (1994)
- Shamoun-Baranes, J., "A comparative analysis of the influence of weather on the flight altitudes of birds", Bulletin of the American Meteoꠓrological Society, 87, pp.47~61 (2006)
- Garthe, S., "Scaling possible adverse effects of marine wind farms on seabirds: developing and applying a vulnerability index", Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, pp.724~734 (2004)
- Desholm, M., "Avian collision risk at an off-shore wind farm", Biology Letters, 1, pp.296~298 (2005)
- Johnston, A., "Modelling flight heights of marine birds to more accurately assess collision risk with offshore wind turbines", Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, pp.31~41 (2014)[DOI]
- Furness, R. W., "Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms", Journal of Environmental Management, 119, pp.56~66 (2013)
- 김소리나, "제주도 구좌지역 해상풍력단지 예정지역의 물새류현황조사", 한국조류학회지, 14(2), pp.67~75 (2007), 한국조류학회II
- 김정수, "풍력발전단지 개발이 조류분포에 미치는 영향", 풍력에너지저널, 12(2), pp.21~29 (2021), 한국풍력에너지학회[DOI]
- Wunderle, Jr. JM., "Census Methods for Caribbean Land Birds", United States Department of Agriculture, ~ (1994)
- Towards standardised seabirds at sea census techniques in connection with environmental impact assessments for offshore wind farms in the UK: a comparison of ship and aerial sampling methods for marine birds and their applicability to offshore wind farm assessments, "Camphuysen, C. J.", ~, pp.COWRIE-BAM-02-2002 (2004)
- Dierschke, V., "Offshore wind energy:Research on environmental impacts", pp.121~143 (2006), Springer
- Johansen, K. L., "Manual for seabird and marine mammal survey on seismic vessels in Greenland", Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, ~ (2012)
- Shannon, C. E., "The mathematical theory of communication", pp.1~117 (1949), University of Illionis Press
- Pielou EC, "Ecological Diversity", pp.1~165 (1975), Wiley
- Larsen, J. K., "Effect of wind turbines on flight behaviour of wintering common eiders: implications for habitat use and collision risk", Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, pp.516~522 (2007)
- Krüger, T., "Flight altitudes of coastal birds in relation to wind direction and speed", Atlantic Seabirds, 3, pp.203~216 (2001)
- A review of flight heights and avoidance rates of birds in relation to offshore windfarms, "Cook, A.", British Trust for Ornithology, ~ (2012)
- Desholm, M., "Avian collision risk at an offshore wind farm", Biology Letters, 1, pp.296~298 (2005)
- Buckland, S. T., "Aerial surveys of seabirds: the advent of digital methods", Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, pp.960~967 (2012)
- Bouten, W., "A flexible GPS tracking system for studying bird behaviour at multiple scales", Journal of Ornithology, 154, pp.571~580 (2013)
- Liechti, F., "Birds: blowin’ by the wind?", Journal of Ornithology, 147, pp.202~211 (2006)
- Cooper, B. A., "The altitude of bird migration in eastꠓcentral Alaska: a radar and visual study", Journal of Field Ornithology, 66, pp.590~608 (1995)
- Kahlert, J. A., "Factors affecting the flight altitude of migrating waterbirds in Western Estonia", Ornis Fennica, 89, pp.241~253 (2012)
- Day, R. H., "Environmental effects on the fall migration of eiders at Barrow", Alaska. Marine Ornithology, 32, pp.13~24 (2004)
- Corman, A., "What flight heights tell us about foraging and potential conflicts with wind farms: A case study in Lesser Black-backed Gulls (Larus fuscus)", Journal of Ornithology, 155, pp.1037~1043 (2004)
- Mendel, B., "Ecological Research at the Offshore Wind Farm Alpha Ventus—Challenges, Results and Perspectives", pp.95~110 (2014), Springer Fachmedien
- Ross-Smith, V. H., "Modelling flight heights of lesser black-backed gulls and great skuas from GPS: a Bayesian approach", Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, pp.1676~1685 (2016)
- Withers, P. C., "The significance of ground effect to the aerodynamic cost of flight and energetics of the black skimmer(Rhyncops nigra)", Journal of Experimental Biology, 70, pp.13~26 (1977)
- Brown, M., "Causes of mortality among wild swans in Britain", Wildfowl, 43, pp.70~79 (1992)
- Rees, E. C., "Bewick’s Swan" (2006), T. & A.D. Poyser
- Fijn R. C., "Habitat use, disturbance and collision risks for Bewick’s Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii wintering near a wind farm in the Netherlands", Wildfowl, 62, pp.97~116 (2012)
- Stenberg, C., "Long-term effects of an ofshore wind farm in the North Sea on fsh communities", Marine Ecology Progress Series, 528, pp.257~265 (2015)
- Vandendriessche, S., "Equivocal effects of offshore wind farms in Belgium on soft substrate epibenthos and fsh assemblages", Hydrobiologia, 756, pp.19~35 (2015)
- Vanermen, N., "Seabird avoidance and attraction at an ofshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea", Hydrobiologia, 756, pp.51~61 (2015)
- Masden, E.A., "Barriers to movement: impacts of wind farms on migratꠓing birds", ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66, pp.746~753 (2009)
- Peschko, V., "Telemetry reveals strong effects of offshore wind farms on behaviour and habitat use of common guillemots (Uria aalge) during the breeding season", Marine Biology, 167, pp.118~131 (2020)