본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다자간 안보레짐의 한계: 탈냉전기 유럽 안보협력에 대한 신자유제도주의적 접근

Limits of the Multilateral Security Regime: Neoliberal Institutional Approach to the European Security Cooperation in the Post-cold war Era.

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper investigates the neoliberal institutionalism with theoretical and empirical approach. The neoliberal institutionalist has insisted that states in the anarchy can cooperate each other through international institutions. The detente and the arms control talks in Europe supported this position. However, the CSCE/OSCE that the neoliberal institutionalist suggested as the representative multilateral security regime revealed the limits of their position on the international cooperation. At first, the multilateral security regime made an critical role in cooperation during the establishment of the CSCE. After the OSCE organized, however, it could not make roles as the security cooperative organization. This research explore the reactions of the OSCE in two conflicts in the Balkan peninsula and analyze its effectiveness through the framework drawn from the neo-neo debate: institutional effectiveness, cheating and relative gains.

Abstract

This paper investigates the neoliberal institutionalism with theoretical and empirical approach. The neoliberal institutionalist has insisted that states in the anarchy can cooperate each other through international institutions. The detente and the arms control talks in Europe supported this position. However, the CSCE/OSCE that the neoliberal institutionalist suggested as the representative multilateral security regime revealed the limits of their position on the international cooperation. At first, the multilateral security regime made an critical role in cooperation during the establishment of the CSCE. After the OSCE organized, however, it could not make roles as the security cooperative organization. This research explore the reactions of the OSCE in two conflicts in the Balkan peninsula and analyze its effectiveness through the framework drawn from the neo-neo debate: institutional effectiveness, cheating and relative gains.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 구춘권, "냉전체제의 극복과 집단안보의 잃어버린 10년: 평화연구의 시각에서의 비판적 재구성", 국제정치논총, 43(2), pp.29~51 (2003), 한국국제정치학회
  2. 홍기준, "안보레짐의 형성: CSCE", OSCE 사례연구, 1998, pp.38(1), ~
  3. 홍기준, "CSCE 레짐동학 (1972-1994) 분석: 권력, 이익, 지식을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 46(3), pp.55~76 (2006), 한국국제정치학회
  4. 황진환, "한국의 안보와 군비통제" (2006), 봉명
  5. Axelrod, Robert, "The evolution of cooperation" (1984), Basic Books
  6. Baldwin, D, "Neorealism and Neoliberalism : TheContemporary Debate" (1993), Columbia University Press
  7. Banks, Michael, "TheInter-Paradigm Debate, In International Relations" (1985), A Handbook of Current Theory
  8. Coase, Ronald, "The nature of thefirm", Economica, 4(16) (1937)
  9. Goldstein, Judith, "Ideas and foreign policy" (1993), Cornell University Press
  10. Grieco, Joseph., "Anarchy and the limits of cooperation : arealist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism", International Organization, 2(3) (1988)
  11. Keohane, Robert, "Transnational Relations and World Politics" (1971), Harvard University Press
  12. Keohane, Robert, "After Hegemony : Cooperation and Discord in World Political Economy. Princeton. N. J. : Princeton University Press, In After Hegemony : Cooperation and Discord in World Political Economy" (1984), Princeton University Press
  13. Keohane, Robert, "Power and Interdependence" (1977), Little, Brown
  14. Keohane, Robert, "Neorealism and its critics" (1983), Columbia University Press
  15. Keohane, Robert, "International Institutions and State Powers : Essays in International Relations Theory" (1989), Westview Press
  16. Kindleberger, Charles, "The world indepression, 1929-1939" (1939), AllenLane
  17. Krasner, Stephen D, "Regimes and the Limits of Realism : Regimesas Autonomous Variables", International Oganization, 36(2) (1982)
  18. Krasner, Stephen D., "International Regimes" (1983), Cornell University Press
  19. Mastanduno, Michael, "Do Relative Gains Matter Amreica's Response to Japanese Industrial Policy", International Security, 16 (1991)
  20. Mearsheimer, John, "The False Promise ofI nternational Institutions", International Security, 19(3) (1994)
  21. Otte, Marc, "ESDP and Multilateral Security Organizations: Workingwith NATO, the UN and OSCE, In The EU's Search for a StrategicRole : ESDP and Its Implications for Transatlantic Relations" (2002), Center for Transatlantic Relations
  22. Powell, Robert, "Absolute and Relative Gains inn International Relations Theory", American Political Science Review, 85 (1991)
  23. Powell, Robert, "Anarchy in international relationst heory : theneorealist-neoliberaldebate", International Organization, 48(2) (1994)
  24. Rotfeld, Adam-Daniel, "CSBMsinEurope: A Future-Oriented Concept, In Conventional Arms Control and East-West Security" (1989), Duke University Press
  25. Ruggie, John G, "International Response to Technology: Concepts and Trends", Internationa lOrganization, 29(3.) (1975)
  26. Snidal, Duncan, "The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory", International Organization, 39(4) (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)