본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Searching for an East Asian Security Theory: Threat Transition and Two-Level Security Dilemma

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

Presupposing the significance of the regional-level theories of international relations, this essay explores an East Asian regional theory in comparison with the universal theories, and argues that the two kinds of theory can be mutually complementary. This essay is divided into three parts. While the first part addresses the significance of the attempt to find an East Asian theory, the second begins with an explanation of the conventional and universal security theories, including the theories of balance of power, power transition, balance of threat, and security dilemma, and it surveys how the theory of international society reviews the universal theories. The second part then suggests the theories of threat transition and two-level security dilemma, and analyzes the threat perception in East Asia through the two frameworks with a purpose of criticizing and modifying the universal theories. The third part discusses actual East Asian experiences―the Korean War, Korea–Japan relations, and South–North Korea relations ―to which the theories of threat transition and two-level security dilemma may apply.

Abstract

Presupposing the significance of the regional-level theories of international relations, this essay explores an East Asian regional theory in comparison with the universal theories, and argues that the two kinds of theory can be mutually complementary. This essay is divided into three parts. While the first part addresses the significance of the attempt to find an East Asian theory, the second begins with an explanation of the conventional and universal security theories, including the theories of balance of power, power transition, balance of threat, and security dilemma, and it surveys how the theory of international society reviews the universal theories. The second part then suggests the theories of threat transition and two-level security dilemma, and analyzes the threat perception in East Asia through the two frameworks with a purpose of criticizing and modifying the universal theories. The third part discusses actual East Asian experiences―the Korean War, Korea–Japan relations, and South–North Korea relations ―to which the theories of threat transition and two-level security dilemma may apply.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Balzacq, T., "Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve" (2011), Routledge
  2. Booth, K., "The security dilemma: Fear, cooperation and trust in world politics" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  3. Boudon, R., "Review: What middle-range theories are", Contemporary Sociology, 20(4), pp.519~522 (1991)
  4. Bueno de Mesquita, B., "of international politics: War, peace, and world order" (2015), Chaos Book
  5. Buzan, B., "The evolution of international security studies" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  6. Cerny, P., "Rethinking world politics : A theory of transnational neopluralism" (2010), Oxford University Press
  7. Cha, D. H., "The US-China rivalry over naval hegemony in East Asia" (2012), Book Korea
  8. Cumings, B., "Japan as number one: The American preference for Japan in the East Asian order, 1894-2014", Paper presented at East Asia and Future Korea in the Gabo Year: 1894 and 2014 (2014), Seoul National University
  9. Cumings, B., "Inventing the Axis of Evil: The truth about North Korea, Iran, and Syria" (2004), Jishigeui Punggyeong
  10. Dawisha, A., "Nation and nationalism: Historical antecedents to contemporary debates", International Studies Review, 4(1), pp.3~22 (2002)
  11. Gallicchio, M., "Pacific passage: The study of American-East Asian relations on the eve of the twentyfirst century", pp.247~275 (1996), Columbia University Press
  12. Gills, B., "Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations", pp.186~212 (1993), Cambridge University Press
  13. Herz, J., "Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma", World Politics, 2(2), pp.157~180 (1950)
  14. Hudson, V., "Foreign policy analysis : Classic and contemporary theory" (2007), Rowman &Littlefield
  15. 황지환, "전망이론의 현실주의적 이해: 현상유지경향과 상대적 손실의 국제정치이론", 국제정치논총, 47(3), pp.7~25 (2007), 한국국제정치학회
  16. Jervis, R., "The impact of the Korean War on the Cold War", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(4), pp.563~592 (1980)
  17. Kang, J., "Beyond Western-centeredness" (2004), Acanet
  18. Kim, G., "Global knowledge forum and the violence of symbols: Critical reflections on social sciences in Korea" (2015), Munhakdongne
  19. Kim, T., "Contemporary theories of international relations and Korea", pp.81~117 (2004), Sahoepyeongnon
  20. Kim, W., "Contemporary theories of international relations and Korea", pp.118~152 (2004), Sahoepyeongnon
  21. Klotz, A., "Strategies for research in constructivist international relations" (2007), M. E. Sharpe
  22. Lee, J., "Maintenance and variation of the San Francisco System", Proceedings from Seoul National University Asia Center Conference: The Chinese Revolution, the Korean War, and regional order in East Asia (2013)
  23. Lee, S., "Burying the hatchet? The sources and limits of Japan-South Korea security cooperation", Asian Security, 9(2), pp.93~110 (2013)
  24. Little, R., "The balance of power in international relations: Metaphors, myths and models" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  25. Lobell, S., "Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy", pp.42~74 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  26. 민병원, "신(新)안보딜레마와 네트워크 국제정치 - 이론적 분석", 평화연구, 20(1), pp.31~69 (2012), 평화와 민주주의연구소[DOI]
  27. Oren, I., "Our enemies and US: America’s rivalries and the making of political science" (2003), Cornell University Press
  28. Putnam, R., "Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games", International Organization, 42(3), pp.427~460 (1988)
  29. Ross, R., "Chinese security policy: Structure, power and politics" (2009), Routledge
  30. Rousseau, D., "Identifying threats and threatening identities: The social construction of realism and liberalism" (2006), Stanford University Press
  31. 서정경, "동아시아지역을 둘러싼 미중관계: 중국의 해양대국화를 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 50(2), pp.87~114 (2010), 한국국제정치학회
  32. Jae-Jung Suh, "Assessing the Military Balance in Korea", Asian Perspective, 28(4), pp.63~88 (2004), 극동문제연구소
  33. Taureck, R., "Securitisation theory and securitisation studies", Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(1), pp.53~61 (2006)
  34. Walt, S., "Origins of alliances" (1987), Cornell University Press
  35. Weaver, O., "On security", pp.46~86 (1995), Columbia University Press
  36. Weber, M., "The methodology of the social sciences", pp.49~112 (1949), Free Press
  37. Wight, C., "They shoot dead horses don’t they? Locating agency in the agent-structure problematique", European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), pp.109~142 (1999)
  38. Yan, X., "Zhongguo Xianqin Guojiajian Zhengzhi Sixiang Xuandu" (2008), Fudan University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)