Second image reconsidered: quest for unit complexity in Northeast Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
International politics after the Cold War called our attention to the shifting paradigms in the discipline of international relations. The shift included meta-theoretical attempts for transformations beyond the problem-solving theories searching for systemic stability. Democratic peace theory set itself apart from other system theories by seeking changes at the unit level, and it was closely related to actual policy objectives. The relevance of this theory, however, seemed not to be universal to all the regions, and the reality of Northeast Asia required considerations of the region’s particularities as well as general tendencies of the post-Cold War world. Although the liberal peace approach led by the United States has come to form a new global standard in the post-Cold War period and it bears implications for positive changes in the long run, it has its limits in initiating a new virtuous cycle in Northeast Asia. The limitations come from the aspects of realpolitik in American liberalism on the one hand, and from particular characteristics of Northeast Asian states on the other. That is why we need to think about alternative second images for the host of problems besetting the region, including the cross-straits tensions, the Japan question, and the North Korean problem. It means a consideration of the new political order which can solve the dilemma between status quo and transformation in Northeast Asia.
Abstract
International politics after the Cold War called our attention to the shifting paradigms in the discipline of international relations. The shift included meta-theoretical attempts for transformations beyond the problem-solving theories searching for systemic stability. Democratic peace theory set itself apart from other system theories by seeking changes at the unit level, and it was closely related to actual policy objectives. The relevance of this theory, however, seemed not to be universal to all the regions, and the reality of Northeast Asia required considerations of the region’s particularities as well as general tendencies of the post-Cold War world. Although the liberal peace approach led by the United States has come to form a new global standard in the post-Cold War period and it bears implications for positive changes in the long run, it has its limits in initiating a new virtuous cycle in Northeast Asia. The limitations come from the aspects of realpolitik in American liberalism on the one hand, and from particular characteristics of Northeast Asian states on the other. That is why we need to think about alternative second images for the host of problems besetting the region, including the cross-straits tensions, the Japan question, and the North Korean problem. It means a consideration of the new political order which can solve the dilemma between status quo and transformation in Northeast Asia.
참고문헌 (39)
- Acharya, A., "Asian security order", pp.210~240 (2003), Stanford University Press
- Acharya, A., "Democracy or death?: Will democratization bring greater regional instability to East Asia?", The Pacific Review, 23(3), pp.335~358 (2010)
- Ahn, B., "The empire theory of negri and hardt", Segyejeongchi, 26(1), pp.25~44 (2005)
- Badie, B., "The imported state: The westernization of the political order" (2000), Stanford University
- Bush, G. W., "First inaugural address", ~ (2001)
- Buzan, B., "The new thinking about strategy and international security", pp.31~56 (1991), Unwin Hyman
- Chang, P., "The dynamics of Taiwan’s democratization and crisis in the Taiwan Strait", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 18(1), pp.1~16 (1996)
- Choi, J., "The future of American political thought", Migukhak, 22, pp.111~161 (1999)
- Choi, W., "A study on acceptability of the north and south plans for national unification: commonwealth and a low-level of confederal agreement", Bukhanyeonguhakhoebo, 6(1), pp.5~26 (2002)
- 최관장, "중국 통일 이데올로기와 兩岸 통일방안에 관한 연구", 중국학연구, 24, pp.293~308 (2003), 중국학연구회
- Deudney, D., "State sovereignty as social construct", pp.190~239 (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Friedberg, A., "Ripe for rivalry: Prospects in a multipolar Asia", International Security, 18(3), pp.5~33 (1993)
- Fukuyama, F., "The end of history and the last man" (1992), Free Press
- Goh, B., "East Asia: problems and perspectives" (1995), Munhakgwajiseongsa
- Gong, G., "Memory and history in east and southeast asia", pp.26~45 (2001), The CSIS Press
- Hardt, M., "Empire. Cambridge" (2001), Harvard University Press
- Hechter, M., "Containing nationalism" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Ikenberry, J., "America’s liberal hegemony", Current History, 98, pp.23~28 (1999)
- Inoguchi, T., "Peering into the future by looking back : the westphalian, Philadelphian, and antiutopian paradigms", International Studies Review, 1(2), pp.173~191 (1999)
- Itoh, M., "Japanese constitutional revision : A neo-liberal proposal for article 9 in comparative perspective", Asian Survey, 41(2), pp.310~327 (2001)
- Jackson, R., "Sovereignty" (2007), Polity Press
- Kant, I., "Perpetual peace and other essays" (1983), Hackett Publishing Company
- 김범석, "대만민주화와 양안관계의 변화:민주 평화론을 적용하여", 국제정치논총, 45(2), pp.57~80 (2005), 한국국제정치학회
- Kitaoka, S., "Toward a normal state" (2000), Chuokoron-Shinsha
- Krasner, S., "Problematic sovereignty: Contested rules and political possibilities" (2001), Columbia University Press
- Lind, J., "Democratization and stability in east Asia", International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), pp.409~436 (2011)
- Mearsheimer, J., "Back to the future : Instability after the cold war", International Security, 15(1), pp.5~56 (1990)
- Nau, H., "At home abroad" (2002), Cornell University Press
- Ross, R., "The geography of peace : East Asia in the twenty-first century", International Security, 23(4), pp.81~118 (1999)
- Ruoff, K., "The people’s emperor: democracy and the Japanese Monarchy, 1945–1995" (2001), Harvard University Press
- Russett, B., "Triangulating peace" (2001), W. W. Norton
- Snyder, J., "From voting to violence" (2000), W. W. Norton
- Solingen, E., "Regional orders at century’s dawn" (1998), Princeton University Press
- Talbot, S., "The age of terror: The United States and the world after september 11" (2001), Basic Books
- Tanaka, A., "The new medieval age: The world system in the 21st century" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- The White House, "A national security strategy for a new century", ~ (1999)
- Van Evera, S., "Primed for peace: Europe after the Cold War", International Security, 15(3), pp.7~57 (1990)
- Waltz, K., "Man, the state and war" (1959), Columbia University Press
- Wendt, A., "Why a world state is inevitable", European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), pp.491~542 (2003)